CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion

CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/)
-   C6 Corvette General Discussion (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/c6-corvette-general-discussion-74/)
-   -   Post your BONE STOCK LS3 dyno numbers... (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/c6-corvette-general-discussion/1870236-post-your-bone-stock-ls3-dyno-numbers.html)

03 Z-oh-6 11-21-2007 10:24 PM

Post your BONE STOCK LS3 dyno numbers...
 
Please list: mileage, transmission, octane, if NPP or z51, type of dyno, A/F ratio if possible.

:cheers:

CorvetteMike68 11-21-2007 10:28 PM

Did mine this past Sunday at West Coast Corvettes....08,5200 Miles, MN6 ,91 octane, NPP and Z51...380 RWHP..378 RWTQ :thumbs:


Mike:cheers:

Gramps 11-21-2007 10:35 PM

LS3-MN6-Non-NPP 366HP, 360TQ Running verrrry fat. AFR 10.5-11.5. 2200 mi., DynoJet 11/15/07

03 Z-oh-6 11-21-2007 10:40 PM


Originally Posted by CorvetteMike68 (Post 1562856996)
Did mine this past Sunday at West Coast Corvettes....08,5200 Miles, MN6 ,91 octane, NPP and Z51...380 RWHP..378 RWTQ :thumbs:


Mike:cheers:

nice numbers! Do you happen to know your A/F ratio?

C6 DVL 11-21-2007 10:46 PM

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1001/...056488e1_o.jpg

BONE STOCK LS3 MN6 Z51 NPP W/1,200



http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1241/...e7009111_o.jpg
DYNO SHEET OF ALL 4 PULLS

CorvetteMike68 11-21-2007 10:50 PM


Originally Posted by DitchTehFish (Post 1562857141)
nice numbers! Do you happen to know your A/F ratio?



i have no idea:rolleyes: sorry....it was my first time dynoing any car...to be honest i was alittle nervous..lol



Mike:cheers:

03 Z-oh-6 11-21-2007 11:13 PM

The lowest so far 366 while the highest is 392!!! I realize the NPP may add a few horses. I know there's a lot of factors involved, but 28rwhp is a big variance!!!:ack:

C6 DVL 11-21-2007 11:15 PM


Originally Posted by DitchTehFish (Post 1562857578)
The lowest so far 366 while the highest is 392!!! I realize the NPP may add a few horses. I know there's a lot of factors involved, but 28rwhp is a big variance!!!:ack:

NPP is good for 2 or 3 rwhp
lowest may contribute to Auto trans and the Mustang Dyno

03 Z-oh-6 11-21-2007 11:16 PM


Originally Posted by C6 DVL (Post 1562857595)
NPP is good for 2 or 3 rwhp

So we'll go with 25rwhp difference between the highest and lowest so far. That's disturbing if you ask me.:(

Cjunkie 11-22-2007 10:56 AM


Originally Posted by DitchTehFish (Post 1562857615)
So we'll go with 25rwhp difference between the highest and lowest so far. That's disturbing if you ask me.:(

doesnt shock me at all-different transmissions,sea levels,octane used,mileage variables,DYNO's,engine tolerances,weather,engine temps when dynoed (oil and water). you havent drag raced much or built many engines have you? :toetap:

03 Z-oh-6 11-22-2007 11:12 AM


Originally Posted by Cjunkie (Post 1562861636)
doesnt shock me at all-different transmissions,sea levels,octane used,mileage variables,DYNO's,engine tolerances,weather,engine temps when dynoed (oil and water). you havent drag raced much or built many engines have you? :toetap:

SAE formula should make up for most that.

talon90 11-22-2007 11:19 AM


Originally Posted by DitchTehFish (Post 1562861832)
SAE formula should make up for most that.

SAE net horsepower is still power at the flywheel. Contrary to popular misconception it does nothing for rear wheel horsepower. It will not, does not, compensate for individual dyno operators, Environmental conditions, nor for the wildly mistaken beliefs regarding the parasitic loss of the drivetrain.

Rear wheel dyno numbers are good for the exact car at the exact time in the exact location under the exact conditions and are virtually useless for comparing one to another amidst a sea of variables that exist between the two. Even then it is virtually useless to measure gain unless you know what the flywheel horsepower of the car was. You still have no idea what your individual parasitic loss was through the driveline.

Modshack 11-22-2007 11:23 AM

Heh heh......:rofl:

http://images111.fotki.com/v733/phot...yno0001-vi.jpg

talon90 11-22-2007 11:25 AM


Originally Posted by Modshack (Post 1562861975)

I call :bs

No way you got that kind of number out of thing 2 bone stock. :toetap:

:D

entwood 11-22-2007 11:25 AM

I love this kind of talk. Interesting info. Happy Thanksgiving.
:flag: :flag: :flag:

03 Z-oh-6 11-22-2007 11:35 AM


Originally Posted by talon90 (Post 1562861922)
SAE net horsepower is still power at the flywheel. Contrary to popular misconception it does nothing for rear wheel horsepower.

.

So you're saying that everyone who has their car dyno'ed in SAE format walks away with worthless, completely inaccurate numbers?

need-for-speed 11-22-2007 11:38 AM


Originally Posted by DitchTehFish (Post 1562857615)
So we'll go with 25rwhp difference between the highest and lowest so far. That's disturbing if you ask me.:(

If you've taken many lab courses that involve data collection, instrumentation and the effects of ambient conditions and calibration, you'll learn that there's little value in comparing results from different equipment, operated by different people, on different days, on different sides of the country.


p.s. if my car dynos at 390 rwhp, you can bet I'll still talk it up here !! :D

talon90 11-22-2007 11:44 AM


Originally Posted by DitchTehFish (Post 1562862127)
So you're saying that everyone who has their car dyno'ed in SAE format walks away with worthless, completely inaccurate numbers?

Which SAE format are you discussing? Are you talking about SAE net power or J1349 correction forumula or similar?

What I'm talking about is comparing different cars on different equipment on different days under different conditions by different operators. The only controlled variable you have is they will be different.

While most dyno software possess the ability to apply SAE correction, if the operator does not input the variables data correctly for temperature, humidity and absolute barometric pressure at the time of the test, then yes I'm saying the owner is walking away with a misguided sense of his actual horsepower or worthless numbers on a page. They will always have however as Modshack demonstrated, a pretty picture to present to the forum or for bench racing with their buddies.

It is also worth mentioning that to acurately apply SAE correction there are maximums that can be adjusted for variables, what are the odd that a particular operator on a particular day will know and apply this mandate?

03 Z-oh-6 11-22-2007 11:48 AM


Originally Posted by talon90 (Post 1562862264)
Which SAE format are you discussing? Are you talking about SAE net power or J1349 correction forumula or similar?

What I'm talking about is comparing different cars on different equipment on different days under different conditions by different operators. The only controlled variable you have is they will be different.

While most dyno software possess the ability to apply SAE correction, if the operator does not input the variables data correctly for temperature, humidity and absolute barometric pressure at the time of the test, then yes I'm saying the owner is walking away with a misguided sense of his actual horsepower or worthless numbers on a page. They will always have however as Modshack demonstrated, a pretty picture to present to the forum or for bench racing with their buddies.

I was referring to the correction formula, sorry that I wasn't clear. I do understand what you're saying.

jschindler 11-22-2007 11:59 AM

1340 miles, Z51 MN6 with NPP, 93 octane - 390.5 hp.

I can't find my dyno sheet right now, but it's the dyno at MTI in Houston. If nobody else posts what their's is, I'll look it up later. Gotta go to the in-laws now for turkey!:leaving:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:50 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands