CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion

CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/)
-   C7 General Discussion (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/c7-general-discussion-142/)
-   -   GM response on tail-lights (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/c7-general-discussion/3205222-gm-response-on-tail-lights.html)

Achmed 01-22-2013 09:08 PM

GM response on tail-lights
 
Some guy left a comment on the Corvette FB page

"What made chevy decide not to go with the traditional round tailights on the c7?"

There had been many other comments showing anger at the non-round tail-lights, cormaro, etc. which "Corvette" never responded to. This time (whoever runs the official FB page) answered, probably because it wasn't written in an immature negative manner, anyway here is his answer:

"We wanted to make sure we included a new, innovative LED system that creates an even glow using reverse reflectors and three-dimensional sculpted lens housing. This new design also incorporates the shape of the rear and the integration of the functional aircraft-style outlets in the rear."

texvette2 01-22-2013 09:16 PM

Well maybe now they can ask about the radio knob and screen. It finally dawned on me
what it looks like. An ETCH A SKETCH. That part does not look upscale.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etch_A_Sketch

arkus 01-22-2013 09:20 PM

There is an ETCH A SKETCH option screen for da kids ..

rcallen484 01-22-2013 09:23 PM


Originally Posted by texvette2 (Post 1582917366)
Well maybe now they can ask about the radio knob and screen. It finally dawned on me
what it looks like. An ETCH A SKETCH. That part does not look upscale.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etch_A_Sketch

Your time could be better spent. Just sayin...

Big Lebowski 01-22-2013 09:24 PM

Interesting, but as someone who actually likes the new tail lights, that was the longest non-answer I've heard in a long time. Why can't someone from GM just say, "we thought it looked cool"

rcallen484 01-22-2013 09:28 PM


Originally Posted by Dlinderman (Post 1582917442)
Interesting, but as someone who actually likes the new tail lights, that was the longest non-answer I've heard in a long time. Why can't someone from GM just say, "we thought it looked cool"

Actually their answer is WAY more refreshing than that and they know that everyone already knows that they (GM) think they look cool or they wouldn't be on the car.

ByByBMW 01-22-2013 09:41 PM


Originally Posted by rcallen484 (Post 1582917483)
Actually their answer is WAY more refreshing than that and they know that everyone already knows that they (GM) think they look cool or they wouldn't be on the car.

:iagree:

Chicago1 01-22-2013 10:12 PM


Originally Posted by Dlinderman (Post 1582917442)
Interesting, but as someone who actually likes the new tail lights, that was the longest non-answer I've heard in a long time. Why can't someone from GM just say, "we thought it looked cool"

I agree they danced around it talk about not coming close to a answer. We may never know

peter pan 01-22-2013 10:16 PM

I am also a fan of the new tail lights, time to more forward and the new design is a breath of fresh air:rock:

catbert 01-22-2013 10:18 PM

Indirect LED lighting, with a functional vent. I think it's pretty cool.

alanhang 01-22-2013 10:18 PM


Originally Posted by rcallen484 (Post 1582917428)
Your time could be better spent. Just sayin...

whatever, like, and just saying, the most annoying words for 2012.

alanhang 01-22-2013 10:18 PM


Originally Posted by peter pan (Post 1582917942)
I am also a fan of the new tail lights, time to more forward and the new design is a breath of fresh air:rock:

yes

rcallen484 01-22-2013 10:19 PM


Originally Posted by Chicago1 (Post 1582917921)
I agree they danced around it talk about not coming close to a answer. We may never know

Can you give us an example of what would have been an appropriate response or at least tell us what elements should be included in an appropriate response?

JerriVette 01-22-2013 10:26 PM


Originally Posted by peter pan (Post 1582917942)
I am also a fan of the new tail lights, time to more forward and the new design is a breath of fresh air:rock:

I agree...

SOF Vette 01-22-2013 10:33 PM

UGLY AS HELL...:ack:
http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c3...psceeb4d18.jpg
I'll stick to my '07 ZO6-
That is all.

Snorman 01-22-2013 10:40 PM


Originally Posted by texvette2 (Post 1582917366)
Well maybe now they can ask about the radio knob and screen. It finally dawned on me
what it looks like. An ETCH A SKETCH. That part does not look upscale.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etch_A_Sketch

And what exactly does this have to do with the tail lights and why do you continue to do nothing but troll threads in this section?

I think everybody gets it...you don't like the C7. The simple solution is for you to not buy one and stop whining in every thread about it.
S.

Aaron Keating 01-22-2013 10:40 PM

The back end looks good till you get to the lower section.

By the time they've worked the kinks out, we might get an ''aero tune'' that restyles that lower section.

Certainly the aftermarket will have a fix.

Which might just be about the time I get one new :rock:

The afterburner tail lights have really grown on me. The lower bumper still has not. Doubt it ever will, I'll probably be feeling this way with this particular bumper the way I felt about the C5 and 92-96 C4's back ends. Complete wasted opportunity.

Jinx 01-22-2013 10:40 PM

Oh neat! More snide comments about liking/disliking the taillights.

SOF Vette 01-22-2013 10:42 PM


Originally Posted by Jinx (Post 1582918161)
Oh neat! More snide comments about liking/disliking the taillights.

Oh neat! Someone who has absolutely nothing to contribute posting absolutely nothing to the thread:rock::woohoo::rolleyes:

rocknroller 01-22-2013 10:47 PM


Originally Posted by SOF Vette (Post 1582918179)
Oh neat! Someone who has absolutely nothing to contribute posting absolutely nothing to the thread:rock::woohoo::rolleyes:

Like you just did.

I think the shape of the tail lights are ok, they're just way too big.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:20 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands