CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion

CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/)
-   C1 & C2 Corvettes (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/c1-and-c2-corvettes-4/)
-   -   Opinion on 1966 IP engine stamp. (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/c1-and-c2-corvettes/3754063-opinion-on-1966-ip-engine-stamp.html)

bogdog 12-14-2015 09:23 PM

Opinion on 1966 IP engine stamp.
 
2 Attachment(s)
Sounds like any stamp that is repainted is a giant red flag. The casting seems to be correct.

Any opinions on the stamp or casting photos?

Thanks in advance.

JohnZ 12-14-2015 09:28 PM

Can't evaluate a painted pad - clean it off (don't use anything abrasive or that can gouge the surface). :thumbs:

bogdog 12-14-2015 09:49 PM


Originally Posted by JohnZ (Post 1591114748)
Can't evaluate a painted pad - clean it off (don't use anything abrasive or that can gouge the surface). :thumbs:

Thanks for the quick reply John, Its at a dealer so thats probably not gonna fly.

Ironcross 12-14-2015 10:06 PM

I have one and It was my understanding that it was a early L-72 rated at 450 HP.....I don't see the TO stamp on the pad either....What I do see is a scrambled vin number

RestoMike 12-15-2015 12:06 AM

VIN stamping appears a little funky. The stamping of TII23IP (November 23) appears about right. As mentioned earlier paint needs to come off pad for a unabated look.

tuxnharley 12-15-2015 12:57 AM

Hmmm - well, the "numbers" do match up.

A 942 block is correct for a '66 427.

IP would be a '66 427 425 HP

Nov 23 and VIN 8584 seem to correlate.

Need to see the block casting date, and a clean engine pad.

Good Luck!

Edit - have you checked the car for other indicators as to whether it was originally a BB car?

SonnyAK 12-15-2015 01:23 AM

I'd want to clean the paint off and get a real look at the stamps...I don't like how the paint is so thick and the numbers still look so clear?

bogdog 12-15-2015 01:25 PM

3 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by tuxnharley (Post 1591115829)
Hmmm - well, the "numbers" do match up.

A 942 block is correct for a '66 427.

IP would be a '66 427 425 HP

Nov 23 and VIN 8584 seem to correlate.

Need to see the block casting date, and a clean engine pad.

Good Luck!

Edit - have you checked the car for other indicators as to whether it was originally a BB car?

I am a little worried since I noticed the tranny (3925660) is from a 68-70 car and the differential says AO. Which from my NCRS book and the web says is a 3.70 from a 327. Added some pics of those.

I'm not expecting a show car, just don't want to pay for one:)

Are there any other ways to see if it was originally a 427 car?

Thanks so much to everyone for the replies.

tuxnharley 12-15-2015 01:30 PM

Rear sway bar? Half shaft u joint bolted caps vs u bolts? Which side is the hood strut on?

Cars sounds pretty suspicious to me......

bogdog 12-15-2015 02:00 PM

5 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by tuxnharley (Post 1591118569)
Rear sway bar? Half shaft u joint bolted caps vs u bolts? Which side is the hood strut on?

Cars sounds pretty suspicious to me......

Thanks++.

Sorry my knowledge suspension is limited. I don't have photos of the hood strut.
Looks like it is missing a rear sway bar?

provette67 12-15-2015 04:13 PM

Any sign of transistorized ignition? A must with 425hp

Rumblegutz 12-15-2015 04:31 PM

Rear sway bar is there in the third photo. The attachment and link are in the first and second photo.

bogdog 12-15-2015 04:53 PM

1 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by provette67 (Post 1591119781)
Any sign of transistorized ignition? A must with 425hp

Thanks, I will check when I see the car again. The shielding seems to cover the distributor in the photos, unless there is a clue from this photo.

dplotkin 12-15-2015 05:40 PM

That picture seems to show the TI Ignition resistance wire entering the distributor. What's with the foreign attachment on the drivers side fenderwell? Harness looks screwy and voltage regulator connector askew.


Dan

provette67 12-15-2015 06:10 PM


Originally Posted by bogdog (Post 1591120013)
Thanks, I will check when I see the car again. The shielding seems to cover the distributor in the photos, unless there is a clue from this photo.

Even if the distributor has been changed there should be evidence of the amplifier or at least the wholes where it was. Then again if the front end has had previous repair all bets are off.

DansYellow66 12-15-2015 06:18 PM

Sorry for the blurry pictures - they are from an older camera - don't look nearly so bad until they get enlarged. If an original BB car and the fuel line appears original and not replaced, it should have a 90 degree bend leading to the fuel pump like this repro line on my car. A SB fuel line has about a 45 degree bend in it.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...e/P1010358.jpg

A BB car should have u-joint caps at the differential side yokes like this.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...e/P1010370.jpg

Also the hood support should be on the driver side and you should not find any sign of one possibly having been on the right side.

bogdog 12-15-2015 07:11 PM

Thanks Dan. This will come in handy when I look at the car again.

Ironcross 12-15-2015 11:23 PM

A few observations to help with the identity of some parts available with the hood open and also check the red line on the tach...The BB`s have a wider copper radiator and different core support...

Back to the engine, the IP suffix is 450 HP not 425....Same engine different suffix, rated 25 HP less....ie`.Corvette Black book`for those that must be politically correct ..........but whatever

actually the IP is somewhat rare


politically

Velox 12-16-2015 12:09 AM


Originally Posted by Ironcross (Post 1591122464)
...red line on the tach... Correct. In 1966 only solid lifter big block had the 6500 red lineThe BB`s have a wider copper radiator and different core support...Correct

Back to the engine, the IP suffix is 450 HP not 425.Mostly Wrong...Same engine different suffix, rated 25 HP less..Wrong....actually the IP is somewhat rare Wrong

Many threads here and at NCRS.org and all over the internet easily provide the fact that ALL the solid lifter 1966 big blocks were the same motor regardless of the first few weeks of production when GM put 450HP stickers on them then changed to 425HP stickers after that. ALL were IP assembly build ID except for the persistent rumors of a few IK blocks (425HP M22). IP is NOT rare, it is on every one of the 5000+ L72s produced in 1966. The car under discussion in this thread could be just about anything - gas line could be changed, radiator support and BB radiator added, TI added, tach changed, rear sway bar added, diff/shafts/caps changed etc etc. The best chance to clarify this car would be to verify the VIN tag under the glove box is real and undisturbed and then remove the paint from the engine pad and see if the stamping could be real and if it matches the VIN. And for a potential high dollar car like an L72, a professional expert opinion of the trim/vin/engine pad should be obtained :cheers:

midyear 12-16-2015 06:41 AM


Originally Posted by dplotkin (Post 1591120302)
That picture seems to show the TI Ignition resistance wire entering the distributor. What's with the foreign attachment on the drivers side fenderwell? Harness looks screwy and voltage regulator connector askew.


Dan

The attachment is a bypass for the voltage regulator, this car shows to have been converted to an internal regulated alternator.

I also see the TI harness on the inner fender, and the pink wire should be from the starter, and the white wire showing for the TI harness.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:50 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands