WOT HPTuners Log Question
1 Attachment(s)
Hey fellas, I got a log here with some weird action in the upper rpms. For some reason my fuel is leaning out and well..you'll see. the maf and other junk just looks kinda wacky. Help me out here guys. There are two "pulls" toward the end of the log.
Thanks, Ben Marino |
Anyone?? I'm wondering if I have valve float as well with that MAF reading.
GT12 Lingenfelter Camshaft Comp Beehive Springs |
I don't' see anything unusual with the MAF reading. Looks smooth to me.
Your fuel is commanded at 12.4 and is rich at lower rpm and lean at higher rpm. Perhaps it's just not tuned real well? |
Originally Posted by RonSSNova
(Post 1594969327)
I don't' see anything unusual with the MAF reading. Looks smooth to me.
Your fuel is commanded at 12.4 and is rich at lower rpm and lean at higher rpm. Perhaps it's just not tuned real well? |
Updated Log
1 Attachment(s)
Fixed wideband location.
|
1 Attachment(s)
This is what I see.
Commanded fuel is 12.49:1 (Green) Actual by your wideband is mid 11's. (Yellow) The MAF freq and flow look normal to me. I never see perfectly smooth MAF curves. Ron |
Originally Posted by RonSSNova
(Post 1594972602)
This is what I see.
Commanded fuel is 12.49:1 (Green) Actual by your wideband is mid 11's. (Yellow) The MAF freq and flow look normal to me. I never see perfectly smooth MAF curves. Ron Thanks for the input! :thumbs: Ben Marino |
I don't post here in the C5 section but happened to look at that 1st log and was stumped by the leanout because it only happens only when the vehicle speed increased.
Just curious, where was your WB sensor located to cause this?? |
Originally Posted by NJ_phil
(Post 1594979312)
I don't post here in the C5 section but happened to look at that 1st log and was stumped by the leanout because it only happens only when the vehicle speed increased.
Just curious, where was your WB sensor located to cause this?? |
You're welcome!
My headers conviently had the bung in the center of the X-pipe. WB readings are probably best observed in third and 4th gear. i know in my auto, low gear is always a smidge leaner than 2nd and third despite the airflow falling in the same MAF range. Ron |
Originally Posted by bmarino1974
(Post 1594979379)
Someone had put a bung in the header that was basically pointed at the ground so I bought a angled adapter to move it away from the ground. The only thing I can think of is that staying at high rpm constantly (shifting through gears) and high exhaust flow slowly removed the concentration that I guess had built up in the adapter, leaning out the reading. or something like that lol. I finally tore my exhaust apart and added a bung in the cat, before the catalyst. It's way more sensitive now, and accurate.
Regardless, the car seems to be running great. |
Originally Posted by RonSSNova
(Post 1594980595)
You're welcome!
My headers conviently had the bung in the center of the X-pipe. WB readings are probably best observed in third and 4th gear. i know in my auto, low gear is always a smidge leaner than 2nd and third despite the airflow falling in the same MAF range. Ron Thanks |
Originally Posted by NJ_phil
(Post 1594981598)
Maybe the high vehicle speed cooled off the sensor and threw off the readings. They're pretty temperature sensitive and assume it was hanging down in the airflow under the car. Glad you got it sorted out.
Regardless, the car seems to be running great. |
LTFT Trims went nuts
1 Attachment(s)
yeah so..what the fun sticks happened lol? Take a look. Reloaded an older tune with the same VE table...and this happened. I then went back and loaded the one used in the WOT scan..did the same thing. Any ideas????
|
Camaro Corvette Challenger tuner in Tampa
For more help, you should post the tune related to the scan.
|
Originally Posted by Tampa Tuning
(Post 1595005249)
For more help, you should post the tune related to the scan.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:38 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands