CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion

CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/)
-   Autocrossing & Roadracing (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/autocrossing-and-roadracing-23/)
-   -   HPR and GSpeed team up on a 468 cid road race setup (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/autocrossing-and-roadracing/4044456-hpr-and-gspeed-team-up-on-a-468-cid-road-race-setup.html)

HP RESEARCH 09-19-2017 02:09 PM

HPR and GSpeed team up on a 468 cid road race setup
 
-Build Thread-


HPR and GSpeed have teamed up to showcase a number of new cool and exciting engine and power-train offerings for late model Corvette's, particularly for road racers. In this continuing build thread you will see maybe some things you haven't thought of before, but all are either currently available or so to be available products you can have for your own racer or street car.

There has been a common urban myth surrounding the world of road racing, and that has been to have a higher reving engine you need a shorter stroke. You can find this from the history pages of the Chevy 302 back in the early TransAm days of racing right up to the new destroked LS7 builds that have been growing in popularity. Some of these engines were due to rule limitations like the TransAm series but others were done just because that is what was thought to be the only way to do it. What did it really prove? It takes a lot more RPM to make the same amount of HP from a smaller engine, and low to mid range torque suffers because of it.

Since most of us on here are not racing in a class that has a displacement rule, why handicap yourself right out of the gate by using a smaller engine? I know the love affair with a 8500 RPM V8 is one that we all love to hear blasting down the straights but what if I told you you can make so much power across the board there is no point in doing so? What if I also said, if you need to spin it that high and can feed it....there is no reason a big stroke LS engine can't spin to 8000 RPM or more? :D (more on that later).


Goals: To build a reliable and cost effective LS performance engine package without using exotic or high maintenance components.

Highlights: New and innovative products

Outline:
  • 468 cid LS standard deck aluminum engine
  • lightweight accessory drive system
  • using "shelf" components
  • pump gas for fuel


Episode 1

Short block.



In our talks with Louis the goal on this first engine was to make a big powered engine obtainable to most weekend racers or street cars. No high dollar shaft mount rocker arms. No solid roller cams that would need constant adjustment. No limited production billet cranks or high dollar connecting rods. The best starting point, our signature 468 cid LS of course.



Ground zero is the engine block itself. We use a Darton dry sleeved Gen IV LS engine block as our starting point. In this case it is the typical 5.3L casting. Inside we do use a longer than stock sleeve to better support the increased stroke of the 468. Stock GM main caps are supported with ARP studs and hardware.



https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...9dcf4c6c9c.jpg
Sleeved block



From here we clearance the block to clear our connecting rods for the increased stroke with minimal intrusion into the liners. New cam bearings are installed, main caps are torqued and line honed for proper clearance for the mains. Cylinders are honed to our finish requirements and the deck surface milled to spec. Once machine work is finished, the engine is washed and ready for assembly.



https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...35a3b9ff08.jpg
Checking Mains



The forged crankshaft is measured for journal sizes and prepped for balancing after weighting all components used.



https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...1a81a7d849.jpg
Balancing the crankshaft



Pistons and rods are honed for proper pin clearance then deburred and washed.



The 468 uses a number of components of our own Erik Koenig's design like the pistons and ring package for not only a good seal but reduced drag and friction which again aids in horsepower! Here you can see the rings being sized for gap prior to going on the pistons.



https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...eed4d6dac9.jpg
Checking rings



Once the rods are washed, bolts are lubed and bearings installed prior to hanging the pistons. Another one of Erik's designs was a strong, yet light rod that provided more clearance for the large stroke on our 468.



https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...0a236da368.jpg
Connecting rod detail



With the rotating assembly balanced, parts fitted and washed it is time to assemble.



https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...d1fd97b7b2.jpg
Caps going on



First step is installing bearings into the block and laying the crank in place. Here we can check final rotating drag and trust movement before installing the piston/rod combo.



https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...bdccf02fa0.jpg
Pistons going in



Correctly sized ARP ring compressors are used to install each assembly into the engine block using Motul break in oil.



https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...b992ad7da2.jpg
assembled short block



Once the short block has been assembled we can go in and check our work for deck height at each corner and prepare to install the cam and timing sets coming up in the next installment!



Sneak Peak -


This is one of the brand new items that you will also see featured on this engine build. Louis and the team at GSpeed have developed a completely new front accessory drive for the Corvette. In short, this system has removed 30 lbs of weight off the nose of the car, which is always a big plus. What else is this going to do? It is going to give you a better water pump for increased cooling. A real road race power steering pump setup. Smaller and lighter pulley system, and narrowed belts for less frictional drag. In end not only will it remove weight but you are going to see increased RWHP and quicker acceleration.


I'll let GSpeed go into more details on this one.

https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...cba0a63160.jpg
C5/6 Corvette accessory drive system from GSpeed





STAY TUNED!

KnightDriveTV 09-20-2017 10:24 AM

First comment in, and for that privilege I only need to say this:

Holy sh*tballs, this is exciting

Kubs 09-20-2017 12:15 PM

:bigears :bigears

I like where this is going!

z06801 09-21-2017 10:33 AM

:lurk: sounds awesome!

c5racr1 09-21-2017 07:03 PM

Sounds good

synner 09-22-2017 04:54 PM

Curious how you deal with the piston slap issues and the shorter sleeve for the 442 I see on your website, that's a heck of a long stroke. I'm sure it's a custom piston but would be interested in a bit more detail. Do you still recommend that motor as a road race motor?

Also, what are your thoughts on piston velocity in a road race LS? All the info I find on it seems incredibly outdated and based on a flat tappet SBC with cast rods versus modern motors or ones using forged materials.

HP RESEARCH 09-22-2017 06:13 PM


Originally Posted by synner (Post 1595620919)
Curious how you deal with the piston slap issues and the shorter sleeve for the 442 I see on your website, that's a heck of a long stroke. I'm sure it's a custom piston but would be interested in a bit more detail. Do you still recommend that motor as a road race motor?

Also, what are your thoughts on piston velocity in a road race LS? All the info I find on it seems incredibly outdated and based on a flat tappet SBC with cast rods versus modern motors or ones using forged materials.

Yes the pistons for the 442 are of our own design and no they do not have the comfort of the longer sleeves as you see in the 468. That being said they have no issues regarding "slap" for the piston. Part of that is having the correct offset to the pin, the other is a good skirt design, ring placement, and paying attention to tolerances during machining / assembly.

Both the 442 and 468 would be fine to use a street engines, drag, or road race. Now because of the short skirt design we do not suggest them on power adder cars, so they should be left as NA only builds.

There is no reason why either one of these engines couldn't turn 10,000 RPM as far as the short block is concerned. Piston speeds at that RPM are not even close to what is done in current Pro-Stock drag racing...which you might say...that isn't road racing...but the engine doesn't care (at least as far as RPM goes). What is going to be a concern...or I should say the work is going to be, is feeding an engine of that size to turn those kinds of RPM's. A lot of flow in the heads is going to be needed, a very stable valve train, and intake system to feed it all. The small engines, like the de-stroked LS7, are shall we say easier to do. The engine is smaller and most ported LS7 heads can support the air flow requirements at 8000, 8500 RPM and not really fall of on power production. If anything they probably actually like it there given the smaller size of the engine. On a side note, if you want a 10k RPM engine, going to have to go aftermarket on the sensors and ECU to run it too...but that is a separate topic.

Stay tuned..this first engine you see here will be a milder system build (still over 7200 RPM) that I think most will probably opt to do. We will be featuring a high RPM one as well down the road.

Can't show you everything :thumbs:

KnightDriveTV 09-24-2017 01:31 AM

Would love to see/hear some vids of these beasts. Wish the guy that won the optima qualifier had a good vid of his car, I couldn't find nuttin. 468 gotta sound monstrous through the right pipe setup.

micjester 09-25-2017 11:33 AM

In for details. Definitely interested in the accessory drive!

HP RESEARCH 11-20-2017 10:46 AM

Moving forward.


In sticking with our target of building a reliable big displacement road race engine while using currently available shelf parts without going to crazy on our budget. We are sticking with a hydraulic roller camshaft and OE rocker arms and using current on the market head.

A lot of thought and planning had to be done when it came to the camshaft design. Unlike a drag engine that sees only seconds at WOT, this engine is going to see up to 40 mins at a time on track. Louis at GSpeed, Mr. Godbold at Comp Cams, and ourselves spent a good amount of time working together on choosing the correct pieces to fit within our design and budget layout. More on this later.


First off the easy stuff.
Lifters. In keeping with a 'shelf' part and affordable hyd. roller build we are choosing to use the GM COPO spec lifters made by Johnson. These are the same ones you will find in the 8000RPM factory COPO drag cars and retain the OEM lifter buckets and stock lifter dimensions. Erik has used and tested these in the past, and when used with the proper supporting hardware, prove to be a very solid lifter design.
Some of the highlights of these lifters include:
  • Heat treated forged steel body
  • high flow disc style check valve for better reaction at high RPM
  • improved internal oil metering to supply rocker arms and valve springs without loss in oil pressure
  • needle roller bearing with high chrome steel axle
  • controlled slow leak down piston
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...008b981fe0.jpg





https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...89279f894a.jpg

COPO lifters oiled and ready for install












Cylinder heads

GSpeed and ourselves when over a number of head designs and options out there from LS3 to LS7 style versions. For the purpose of having a solid power band through as much of the RPM range as we could, we settled in on a set of Mamo Motorsports reworked Trick Flow 260 LS7 head.



Louis at GSpeed spec'd these out with a lightweight 73 gram Titanium intake valve and equally light 85 gram stainless exhaust valve. Tony Mamo did his thing on the ports and chambers for what should be a very well flowing cylinder head (flow numbers not available at time of this writing - updated when I have them).


https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...a974241b3b.jpg

MMS 265 LS7 reworked TF260's
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...dd9ef66f16.jpg
Trick Flow 260 LS7 casting
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...fc184e68eb.jpg
Tear down for measurements
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...0a31ae05cb.jpg
chamber with valves installed
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...291547def4.jpg
chamber with valves removed
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...f5ede6ef8d.jpg
intake port




Now the camshaft. Mr. Billy Godbold, the mad scientist at Comp Cams, is probably the leading authority when it comes to actual cam designs and testing valve train systems. Because we are working with an engine designed for lengthy run times on track. A very soft and stable ramp profile of Billy's was chosen along with a new finish of his own working as well on the camshaft. Just shown for the first time at SEMA this year, you will be seeing this much more in the future from Comp Cams.

"We changed our grinding wheels and dress parameters to maximize the load distribution and then wanted a light treatment just to take the fuzz off the top of the topography (like running a finishing mower across a baseball or soccer field). Many of the treatments left a dull finish, but the best one we tested included the burnishing fluid and denser media that also resulted in that more mirror like look. I just don’t want anyone to think it was supposed to be so good looking, but the best finish we developed just had that as a side effect." - Billy Godbold


https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...ab5744dfa5.jpg
COPO lifters, GM lifter trays, 4 pole cam gear, C5R timing chain, Comp Cam, and hardware

https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...207d55b405.jpg
Close up of the new finish on the cam

https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...79bda58317.jpg
Sliding the cam into the 468 lubed with plenty of Motul break in oil


NOTE: Like any doctor we do respect the privacy of our customers so the actual cam specs are not disclosed publicly or to other customers unless GSpeed would like to post them.


For valve springs and rocker arms. Using Billy's own data along with specs from the rest of the build we decided to use a new Comp single spring the 7230 conical. Billy has been using these in his own enduro LS running 8-12 hr races without issue. These will be finished off with a Tool Steel retainer for life, and since they are so small, there is no weight penalty compared to a larger dual spring Ti retainer.

https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...a08ecda7ac.jpg
Comp 7230 spring and Tool Steel Retainer


https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...ac43c6ae19.jpg

The master himself, our own Erik Koenig checking cam timing.








Stay tuned as we finish out assembly and completion of the long block coming up!!!

HP RESEARCH 11-29-2017 04:12 PM

Small update for today:

If you are curious as to the retainer weight difference here is the original PAC Ti retainer for the dual spring compared to the Tool Steel one for the conical Comp springs.

https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...4c4f5eb1dd.jpg
Pac Ti. retainer at 11 grams ea
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...ba9c520370.jpg
Comp Tool Steel retainer for conical springs


For desired compression and quench we are using a 0.051 Cometic gasket set. Heads are held down with a shelf ARP head bolt kit.

https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...4eb999421b.jpg


With the gaskets on, heads were checked for correct install height, shimmed as required and prepared to go on the engine.

https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...9ca3ee76fe.jpg
As sent dual springs with Pac retainers being removed and the heads cleaned.

https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...883995aea8.jpg
Shimming for new Comp conical spring kit

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...0db14a03be.jpg
Comp's 7230 conical spring set with tool steel retainers ready to go.

https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...17a4146aa2.jpg
Heads assembled and torqued


Now that the heads are on, we measured for proper pushrod length and lifter pre-load. Unlike the home user, we have the advantage of keeping a number of pushrods of different sizes and lengths in stock so we can check using a real pushrod, not a checking pushrod. This gives us the ability to look for clearance issues, or any differences from the checker to a real constructed pushrod. *pushrods in route*

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...ea32a95754.jpg
Measuring for pushrod length











Now for some of the new cool features.

As you have seen in the first post, Louis and the guys at GSpeed are working on a new dry sump and accessory drive system to allow use of a bigger pump than the standard 3 stage as well as dropping weight with the new accessories and picking up some HP to boot.

First part of this is the Dailey 5 stage pump with Aerator return.
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...edd5be9a52.jpg
Assembled pan and pump

https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...51146628c7.jpg
Detail work inside the Dailey pan and built in pickup screens

https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...1b24d29997.jpg
Pump return, and aerator return side by side.

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...b5740b5feb.jpg
Mounted on the engine

Again, I will forward some of the new drive features to Louis and the guys at GSpeed. I'll answer what I can on this.

HP RESEARCH 01-03-2018 10:31 AM

Final pieces before we hand it off to Louis and the crew at GSpeed for their drive assembly, sensors, and wiring harness.



One of the things that Billy Godbold had tested with using the new conical single spring and Comp lobe design was the OE rocker and a new Comp design. Since the Comp rocker is still in development and not ready for sale, we went OE on the rockers. A large part of the goal of this first build is to choose proven components using a sensible budget, and with Billy's spintron testing, there was no worry on the OE rockers.

Louis at GSpeed took the time to pull them apart, tumble them, polish and install Comp's trunion upgrade kit before sending them over for install on the engine. New Trick Flow rocker stands locate using two dowels into the cylinder heads. Due to some tight pushrod clearance, we are using a heavy wall 3/8" diameter pushrod for rigidity as our typical 7/16" would not clear in this case.


https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...04da41564a.jpg


https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...2429e9b971.jpg
Tumble polished with Comp trunion upgrade

https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...4a72521d81.jpg
HPR 3/8" diameter, 0.135 wall pushrods

https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...38e5862bfd.jpg
Trick Flow billet stands with new LS7 rocker arms

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...3b3fb3a6f2.jpg
Comp's conical spring and OE rocker arms

https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...de4aa7c248.jpg
Finished long block complete with GSpeed exclusive 5 stage Dailey Engineering Dry Sump







All bagged and ready for customer pickup for the finishing bits! Stay tuned as GSpeed finishes up the new Motec wiring harness in the coming weeks and we get ready to fire it up!

GSpeed 01-03-2018 02:53 PM

Ooooo Wee! Thanks HPR! Cant wait to get it in the car and make some noise. :cheers:

fmcokc 01-04-2018 05:41 PM

So I saw in the opening post that the goal was "To build a reliable and cost effective LS performance engine package without using exotic or high maintenance components."

Looks interesting but "cost effective" is variable from one person to the next.

Do you have a price point target that you are shooting for?

If so, can you give us an idea of what it might be?

Thanks

HP RESEARCH 01-04-2018 06:00 PM


Originally Posted by fmcokc (Post 1596311867)
So I saw in the opening post that the goal was "To build a reliable and cost effective LS performance engine package without using exotic or high maintenance components."

Looks interesting but "cost effective" is variable from one person to the next.

Do you have a price point target that you are shooting for?

If so, can you give us an idea of what it might be?

Thanks

Very true, there are a number of budgets to look after and what is cost effective to some may not be to others. For someone looking at a build such as this, I'm assuming they are not expecting a $7k crate engine at this level.

Taking the 5 stage dry sump system out of the equation, a 468 long block could be done for say $12-13k fully assembled (using your heads as cores) ready for your intake, exhaust, and accessories. Figure another $3500ish for a 3 stage dry sump system. They all vary of course depending on what the customer wants on components inside but figure a rough estimate around that. Its so hard to quote one when doing custom engines as the crankshafts alone can vary $700-3500 in price, rods $500-1800, pistons....just so many variables it's hard to say without knowing 100% what the customer wants.

There are various ways to say it but...lets call it doing it more of the optimal way with a fully counter weighted crank, small journal rods, bigger cam core, solid roller, better heads....you would be looking at $35k + for a long block with dry sump. Now is that going to buy you 2x the power for 2x the money? Probably not but it might gain you 2000-2500 RPM (yes it could turn 9k+ so long as you have the computer to run it, and the supporting top end to feed it) and another 100-150 hp so long as you have the intake system to support it.


Now on this one in particular I would have to speak with GSpeed as they had already purchased the heads to give you more of a ball park in what this exact combo would be to duplicate.

REVHARD 01-04-2018 11:26 PM

where are all the "internet engine build experts" screaming bloody murder seeing beehive springs? lol

sweet build...wish I had the coin to do the same.

Racingswh 01-06-2018 04:05 PM


Originally Posted by HP RESEARCH (Post 1596311973)
Very true, there are a number of budgets to look after and what is cost effective to some may not be to others. For someone looking at a build such as this, I'm assuming they are not expecting a $7k crate engine at this level.


..just so many variables it's hard to say without knowing 100% what the customer wants.

Couldn't be more true.

Thanks for sharing this really thoughtful and impressive build with us!! Can not wait to see power results and then hopefully see some video of how it performs on the track!!

HP RESEARCH 08-24-2018 10:35 AM

We have had a few questions come in about this particular build. The engine is completed at GSpeed but the car in question is going to be doing some class racing for the remainder of the year and the 468 is not legal for that class, so it will possibly be testing over the winter.

We do have a few more variations of the 468 coming up for local customers, and a few more for the group at GSpeed to show off some other combo's as well.

KnightDriveTV 08-25-2018 01:34 PM

Really wanted to hear this beast....

Could it be feasible to just do a 468 shortblock, put on LS6 heads/intake/exhaust as a means to get it in the car, tuned/running, then upgrade the top end as budget allows? Certainly would choke it but, I imagine it'd still be stout, no?

Bad_AX 08-25-2018 09:07 PM

I still want to know about the revised accessory drive system.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:33 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands