Ventilation outlet behind coupe doors; functional?
Hi,
I have a C-1, C5 and C-7 Corvette, was at a Corvette car show last weekend and the subject came up about the ventilation exhaust vents behind the doors on a C-2 Corvette. Some say that they were only on 63-65 C-2s, then eliminated for 66 and 67. Some had said that only 1963 were functional, then blocked off for later years. Some say the opposite. Some say that they were only functional if you didn't have air conditioning.(63-65 ). Some say that there was even a ventilation fan and duct work to boost efficiency. Can anybody set the record straight? Please. Thanks, Mike |
Originally Posted by mxw1
(Post 1598002869)
Hi,
I have a C-1, C5 and C-7 Corvette, was at a Corvette car show last weekend and the subject came up about the ventilation exhaust vents behind the doors on a C-2 Corvette. Some say that they were only on 63-65 C-2s, then eliminated for 66 and 67. Some had said that only 1963 were functional, then blocked off for later years. Some say the opposite. Some say that they were only functional if you didn't have air conditioning.(63-65 ). Some say that there was even a ventilation fan and duct work to boost efficiency. Can anybody set the record straight? Please. Thanks, Mike ONLY on 64 & 65s and ONLY on the driver's side. It does have a fan back by the vent and it is controlled by a vent pull next to the vent pull for the front driver's side pull.. |
…. and not worth crap.....
Bill |
With the windows up and the kick vents open, it works well to move more air. |
Looks like you're going to get some conflicting information here, too. Both the 64 and the 65 had functional roof vents on the driver's side. They operate ONLY with the heater fan in the off position and the cable under the dash pulled to one of the three speed positions, low, med, high speed. They are tthe same on both a/c and non a/c cars.
They pull some air and I used mine back in the old days in the winter with windows up when I had a smoker in the car. I no longer have smokers in my car, so the vent doesn't have as much value. If you open the kick panel vents and turn on the rear fan it allow more air to flow than with the windows up. Might be good in a situation where you want windows all the way up (rain, wind noise, etc). I always thought it was a pretty cool gadget, but use the vent windows more than I use the roof vent. |
Originally Posted by 65GGvert
(Post 1598003222)
Looks like you're going to get some conflicting information here, too. Both the 64 and the 65 had functional roof vents on the driver's side. They operate ONLY with the heater fan in the off position and the cable under the dash pulled to one of the three speed positions, low, med, high speed. They are tthe same on both a/c and non a/c cars.
They pull some air and I used mine back in the old days in the winter with windows up when I had a smoker in the car. I no longer have smokers in my car, so the vent doesn't have as much value. If you open the kick panel vents and turn on the rear fan it allow more air to flow than with the windows up. Might be good in a situation where you want windows all the way up (rain, wind noise, etc). I always thought it was a pretty cool gadget, but use the vent windows more than I use the roof vent. Bill |
One of the best things about my 64 coupe. Very effective in moving heat out of the cabin. Those 66-67 rat motor coupes really could have benefitted from having the cabin vent system.
|
Originally Posted by 65hihp
(Post 1598003274)
One of the best things about my 64 coupe. Very effective in moving heat out of the cabin. Those 66-67 rat motor coupes really could have benefitted from having the cabin vent system.
:hide: Bill |
different people have different tolerance for heat discomfort. I didn't say the cabin vent works like air conditioning. My 64 coupe is not miserable in the heat. Upper or lower case.
For all I know your cabin fan system in your two 65s may have been broken. What I do know is, my cabin vent system works great at pulling hot air out of my coupe. The fan came standard on 4 and 5 coupes. AC was an option. You get what you pay for. The cabin fan if functional as designed is better than nothing, and in my experience much better. |
Originally Posted by wmf62
(Post 1598003250)
yep, pretty cool; so cool that they deleted it in 66/67 :rofl:
Bill |
Precisely. My contention is that after 1964 Chevy went on a cost cutting crusade in production of the Corvette. Lots of details disappeared or were diminished in size or quality.
The cabin vent system was a brilliant feature that did not survive the budget cutting pencil pushers. |
Originally Posted by 65hihp
(Post 1598003381)
different people have different tolerance for heat discomfort. I didn't say the cabin vent works like air conditioning. My 64 coupe is not miserable in the heat. Upper or lower case.
For all I know your cabin fan system in your two 65s may have been broken. What I do know is, my cabin vent system works great at pulling hot air out of my coupe. The fan came standard on 4 and 5 coupes. AC was an option. You get what you pay for. The cabin fan if functional as designed is better than nothing, and in my experience much better. |
Originally Posted by wmf62
(Post 1598003304)
not trying to be a smart azz, but having owned 2 65 coupes, that little exhaust fan may get cigarette smoke out but the ONLY thing that will get the heat out to a comfortable level is a/c... coupes are MISERABLE in the heat without it. the huge rear window provides a greenhouse effect (FWIW, C1s with a hardtop have the same problem due to the large window area)
:hide: Bill I used to smoke (long time ago) and best I remember, it was pretty lame about getting cigarette smoke out of the cabin. And yes, my system worked as designed both mechanically and electrically. Seems like I remember that system being advertised as "draft free" ventialtion meaning no noise or wind blowing from a door window being cracked open. I haven't used mine is years. I see people wanting to buy replacement cables to open/close that vent. They seem to be wanting to fix a cable that is stuck and won't move. Is it because the cable in their car is worn out from use or is it becase it is stuck from non-use? I tend to think it is the latter. Or how about the cars that had that almost useless vent filled in because some didn't like the looks of it and knew it didn't do much anyway? |
Well, I learned something today. I was not aware that 64 have that feature as well as 65. :thumbs:o |
I believe 64 and 65 Tankers did not have the blower.
|
Thanks for your reply
Originally Posted by mxw1
(Post 1598002869)
Hi,
I have a C-1, C5 and C-7 Corvette, was at a Corvette car show last weekend and the subject came up about the ventilation exhaust vents behind the doors on a C-2 Corvette. Some say that they were only on 63-65 C-2s, then eliminated for 66 and 67. Some had said that only 1963 were functional, then blocked off for later years. Some say the opposite. Some say that they were only functional if you didn't have air conditioning.(63-65 ). Some say that there was even a ventilation fan and duct work to boost efficiency. Can anybody set the record straight? Please. Thanks, Mike Mike |
Originally Posted by 68hemi
(Post 1598003007)
ONLY on a 1965 and ONLY on the driver's side. It does have a fan back by the vent and it is controlled by a vent pull next to the vent pull for the front driver's side pull..
Not very functional. Mine was wired (from factory?) such that the vent was on..., or the heater fan was on. I put a toggle switch on the vent motor such that I could turn them both off. https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...b221ec1fbd.jpg https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...8efd396785.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.cor...8766be6813.jpg |
better late than never I guess.
|
Originally Posted by wmf62
(Post 1598003304)
not trying to be a smart azz, but having owned 2 65 coupes, that little exhaust fan may get cigarette smoke out but the ONLY thing that will get the heat out to a comfortable level is a/c... coupes are MISERABLE in the heat without it. the huge rear window provides a greenhouse effect (FWIW, C1s with a hardtop have the same problem due to the large window area)
:hide: Bill |
Originally Posted by vettsplit 63
(Post 1598006256)
Bill, could it be that the supercool 63 split windows were an engineering exercise to cut down on the greenhouse effect? Two small windows rather than 1 huge one.... Hmmmmmm....... :rofl:
Oh, sorry, I got carried away... |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:06 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands