CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion

CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/)
-   Ask Tadge (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/ask-tadge-171/)
-   -   [ANSWERED] Oil life monitor calibration same for dry and wet sump? (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/ask-tadge/4212757-answered-oil-life-monitor-calibration-same-for-dry-and-wet-sump.html)

jvp 11-15-2018 03:25 PM

[ANSWERED] Oil life monitor calibration same for dry and wet sump?
 
The original question is here.


Patman asked:
I'm curious if the algorithm is exactly the same for the oil life monitor on the dry sump equipped cars as it is for the wet sump equipped cars? With the extra 3 quarts of oil in the dry sump (30% more oil), in theory the oil should last longer between changes and therefore I wonder if the OLM allows for that extra mileage possibility? Also, how does the OLM take into account both the time factor and the mileage factor?

Tadge answered:
Great question, Patman. This is one I bet a lot of people are curious about. Obviously, maintaining the quantity and quality of the oil in your engine is paramount for long term durability and performance. There are many things that work to deteriorate the quality of your oil and we make the oil life monitor (OLM) as accurate as we can to predict oil life in consideration of all of those variables. The simplest variable is the length of time the oil is in the engine. As you surmise in your question, this is an important variable. Oil ages sitting inside your engine differently than in a sealed container. It is exposed to more oxygen, humidity, various sealants and a variety of metals in your engine. Also, time causes things you might not expect to have an influence such as oxidation of your oil filter. To account for this variable there is an OLM clock that begins a year-long count down every time it is reset. So that is the best you can do…. Change your oil and filter once a year.

You also surmise that mileage should be a factor. We could use mileage, but it is more accurate to actually count combustion events. Every time the fuel and oxygen ignite in the cylinder a tiny quantity of contaminants slip past the piston rings and gets into your oil. Over time, these contaminants build up and hurt the oil’s lubrication capability. You can see this effect as the oil darkens over time.

OK, but all combustion events are not created equal, right? There is a big difference between cruising down the highway under light load and tearing it up on the track. On the highway, the coolant and oil stay relatively cool and there is little stress on the engine. On the track, when oil temps are high, oil molecules actually fracture and that hurts lubrication performance. We handle that buy adding a multiplier that compounds the number of combustion events that occur at higher temperatures. The hotter the oil, the more heavily we weight those events and the shorter the life prediction. On the other hand, running your engine at low temperatures stresses the oil as well. So we also have a multiplier that over-weights combustion events when it is cold. People who drive in cold climates and take relatively short trips are going to find they have shorter oil life. The display in the cluster is regularly updated to the lesser of the time-based or use-based metrics.

Lastly, to get to the first part of your question: No, the dry-sump cars do not use the same algorithm as the wet-sump. As you theorize, having more oil dilutes contamination and distributes thermal stress across a greater quantity of oil. Those are both true and, even though you get some life extension, it is not in direct proportion to the total quantity of oil in the system. Why not? Well the time-based degradation is very insensitive to oil quantity. And don’t forget the oil in dry-sump cars get more exposure to air and system metals (and other materials) because of the tank and plumbing. The extra oil quantity helps roughly in proportion to volume for contamination, but not quite in proportion when it comes to thermal stress. Since dry-sump cars are more likely to see track duty or hard street driving we tend to be a little conservative to make sure oil is changed before it falls below a performance level needed to assure perfect operation of your engine. Bottom line is that, depending how you use your car, the dry sump will have at least the life of wet sump, and probably somewhat more.


Fastmikefree 11-16-2018 08:25 AM

Very interesting and exhaustive answer from Tadge, as usual! Highly appreciated!

I will have been interested to also know on why ensuring that your oil level is good, differs that much between models? On some do it on a cold engine, on others, once oil is at temp, wait for 5 to 10minutes max, and perform the check, etc... this ends to sometimes users confusion and or mistake that can potentially conducts to a disaster.

It will be so great to have one single way to check it (best on cold engine before your start in the morning), or even an oil gauge as on some Porsche.
Just my 2 cent
Phil

JHundertmark 11-16-2018 10:52 AM

#2 Phil - While dry sumps can be a slight pain to check oil since they are different from process used for years on wet sump engines - I first ran across dry sump protocol 18 years with motorcycles with dry sump. I typically check wet sump engines prior to starting in the morning except on our 2018 Fusion Sport which states warm engine to operating temperature, shut off engine, & wait 15 minutes. Only wet sump vehicle that I have seen this protocol on.

#1 - Tadge response on oil life monitor - Very good with well explained detail. Due to low annual mileage & street driving, our 2016 with dry sump will always fall under the 1 year time limit.

The HACK 11-16-2018 05:49 PM


Originally Posted by JHundertmark (Post 1598345728)
I typically check wet sump engines prior to starting in the morning except on our 2018 Fusion Sport which states warm engine to operating temperature, shut off engine, & wait 15 minutes. Only wet sump vehicle that I have seen this protocol on.

BMW wet sump engines also require that you start up and warm up the engine for 10 minutes and check after shut down, not on a cold engine.

Of course most BMW wet sump engines now don't have dipsticks so you can't check the oil when the car hasn't been fired up anyway.

Oh Boy 11-17-2018 12:00 PM

I don't know about the C7 but the OLM on my '13 GS with dry sump does not count down from one year. It's been about 15 months since I last changed it and it is on 37% not zero.

Gary '09 C6 11-17-2018 05:15 PM

If I'm not mistaken, the "one-year since reset" OLM countdown was introduced with the C7 (LT1 engine for 2014 m-y).

Skid Row Joe 11-17-2018 10:21 PM

The stock answer of; "change your oil once year," doesn't address at all the olm that doesn't have the ability to determine oil quality. That's out of it's parametric agility. The original oil fill in my bought new C7, is going on 2.5 years old, and still has yet to time out. That means that the olm is nothing more than a timer, if you will. Since it certainly cannot ascertain the actual age OR quality of the crankcase oil. It signifies that the olm, isn't actually capable of measuring anything meaningful as pertains to whether the oil needs replacing or not. The people who are assuming that their low mileage or no mileage oil is bad on Day 366 of the oil fill, seemingly aren't aware of the olm's inability to provide a scientific chemical analysis of the oil's quality to them.

C7s 11-20-2018 09:14 AM

Does the new 0W-40 oil change the algorithm?

SBC_and_a_stick 11-20-2018 01:39 PM

OEM's have come so far in tracking oil quality! Neat! Thanks Tadge.

LIStingray 11-21-2018 07:26 AM


Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe (Post 1598353714)
The stock answer of; "change your oil once year," doesn't address at all the olm that doesn't have the ability to determine oil quality. That's out of it's parametric agility. The original oil fill in my bought new C7, is going on 2.5 years old, and still has yet to time out. That means that the olm is nothing more than a timer, if you will. Since it certainly cannot ascertain the actual age OR quality of the crankcase oil. It signifies that the olm, isn't actually capable of measuring anything meaningful as pertains to whether the oil needs replacing or not. The people who are assuming that their low mileage or no mileage oil is bad on Day 366 of the oil fill, seemingly aren't aware of the olm's inability to provide a scientific chemical analysis of the oil's quality to them.

The only way to do what you are suggesting is lab monitoring of the engine oil. You could do quarterly lab sampling of your oil until it is nearing the end of its chemical life, and with our marine diesels that hold 13 gallons of oil each, that is what we do, both to keep track of wear and minimize the number of unnecessary $700 per engine oil changes (not to mention avoiding issues that oil tracking will pick up with $100,000+ engines). With the Corvette, spending $25 per quarterly oil sampling ($100/yr) makes zero sense when an annual oil change with two 5-quart jugs of Mobil 1 and a filter is $55.
Tadge - Thanks for the information, and most of us really enjoy your feedback on important issues.

Kozzzz 12-03-2018 06:44 AM


Originally Posted by Oh Boy (Post 1598351231)
I don't know about the C7 but the OLM on my '13 GS with dry sump does not count down from one year. It's been about 15 months since I last changed it and it is on 37% not zero.


Originally Posted by Gary '09 C6 (Post 1598352440)
If I'm not mistaken, the "one-year since reset" OLM countdown was introduced with the C7 (LT1 engine for 2014 m-y).

Yep! The one year "calendar" aspect of the oil life monitor was introduced in the 2014 model year. Before that, it was a combustion event counter and an odometer counter, and the remaining oil life was always the minimum of those two remaining lives.

Kozzzz 12-03-2018 06:50 AM


Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe (Post 1598353714)
The stock answer of; "change your oil once year," doesn't address at all the olm that doesn't have the ability to determine oil quality. That's out of it's parametric agility. The original oil fill in my bought new C7, is going on 2.5 years old, and still has yet to time out. That means that the olm is nothing more than a timer, if you will. Since it certainly cannot ascertain the actual age OR quality of the crankcase oil. It signifies that the olm, isn't actually capable of measuring anything meaningful as pertains to whether the oil needs replacing or not. The people who are assuming that their low mileage or no mileage oil is bad on Day 366 of the oil fill, seemingly aren't aware of the olm's inability to provide a scientific chemical analysis of the oil's quality to them.

This is a good point. The oil life monitor is an oil life model (estimate), not an oil life measurement. They're correlating parameters that already get measured on the engine (speed, temperature, time) and correlate that to oil life testing. They're doing this instead of installing hardware dedicated specifically for that job (which add weight and money, and might end up costing more than what it costs to change the oil at whatever intervals the model would predict).

Perf n Restore 12-15-2018 04:31 PM

Patman: Great question. Thanks for asking. Tadge had a great answer.

MMD 12-15-2018 08:23 PM

Seems as if many owners are always looking for ways to use another oil than what GM recommends for whatever their reasons. Got me thinking, just maybe the OLM algorithms must be tied specifically to the use of Mobil 1 Dexos2 oil GM recommends. This would suggest using the OLM for any other oil more than likely would be inaccurate for these people.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:52 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands