‘70 LT-1 with PS
Is it possible for a ‘70 LT-1 to have PS that has a VIN with the last four of 2018? Seems a little early in that production year to have PS. My impression is that PS wasn’t available until late ‘70. 2018 indicates an early production in that year. Correct?
|
is it 12018 or 02018? big difference of early vs late...
|
I thought A/C was the belt driven option that was not available with the LT1 (until 1972) because it threw the belt.
|
Originally Posted by theandies
(Post 1599055048)
I thought A/C was the belt driven option that was not available with the LT1 (until 1972) because it threw the belt.
|
02108
|
Originally Posted by bearcatfan9
(Post 1599055183)
02108
|
No P/S from the factory with the CTU stamped engine which had the "6 qt" oil pan.
CTK stamped engines showed up in late March or so. March production is vin 5184-7977, so maybe P/S started around car 7000. CTK engines along with the rest of the 350's had the "5 qt" oil pan which allowed for the P/S steering linkage. It is possible that an owner of an early CTU car added P/S along with changing the pan, But if there is documentation, like a tank sticker, that says P/S, beware! So No P/S from the factory with CTU and CTK may or may not have P/S. |
Originally Posted by kenba
(Post 1599055153)
He is asking about PS not AC. PS was offered late production in 1970 but not AC. Oil pan changed to a 5 QT from a 6QT to allow for PS.
|
R..I..G..H..T.... You meant P/S....and it was power steering that threw the belts..... :toetap:
|
Originally Posted by 7T1vette
(Post 1599058810)
R..I..G..H..T.... You meant P/S....and it was power steering that threw the belts..... :toetap:
Originally Posted by theandies
(Post 1599055048)
I thought A/C was the belt driven option that was not available with the LT1 (until 1972) because it threw the belt.
|
Originally Posted by theandies
(Post 1599064824)
Dude, What's your problem. I suggest you read my post again. Here I'll quote it for you:
Reading and reading comprehension are two different things. :rolleyes: |
Sadly, it is so....
|
Originally Posted by Dirty Dalton
(Post 1599066222)
Some are troubled by a lack of a sense of humo(u)r.
Originally Posted by 7T1vette
(Post 1599069444)
Sadly, it is so....
|
Sorry, Sir, it wasn't your sense of humo(u)r that I questioned.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands