CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion

CorvetteForum - Chevrolet Corvette Forum Discussion (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/)
-   C7 ZR1 Discussion (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/c7-zr1-discussion-176/)
-   -   Fun calculus problem for ZR1 (https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/c7-zr1-discussion/4278964-fun-calculus-problem-for-zr1.html)

SouthernSon 05-28-2019 11:00 AM

Fun calculus problem for ZR1
 
Problem: Imagine an east to west coast 'autobahn' highway with no speed limits. If one were to figure a fuel stop takes 10 minutes on average where would speed and fuel mileage give one the quickest arrival at the other end? ;)

Rinaldo Catria 05-28-2019 11:39 AM

What are the cars mpg stats at various speeds? That info information is needed, no?

Thomasmoto 05-28-2019 11:52 AM

This came up in a group I was in last spring. It's almost impossible to calculate with so many variables, but IIRC it was around 33-34 hours time, but no idea on fuel used. As far as sources go I'll have to plead the 5th.

SouthernSon 05-28-2019 07:41 PM

True that we don't have any quantitative figures to ascertain the correct amount but the formula depicting the relationship of the variables can be shown.

JBHunter 05-28-2019 10:07 PM

3000 miles divided by 100 mph avg speed equals 30 hours...simple enough...

3000 miles divided by 15 mpg in overdrive 7th or 8th gear equals 200 gals ...again...simple enough

SouthernSon 05-29-2019 10:38 AM

Okay, math geniuses, I know someone has a handle on this equation. It reminds me of the problem of a farmer with so much of this fence that costs this and so much of another type material that costs this and wants to get so much road frontage and yet retain so much acreage while minimizing costs...etc.. (IIRC). Someone remembers calculus, right?? It was decades ago for me. :D

UnhandledException 05-30-2019 07:12 AM

This is algebra though not calculus.

SouthernSon 05-30-2019 08:55 AM


Originally Posted by UnhandledException (Post 1599491193)
This is algebra though not calculus.

With the number of variables I would think calculus may be more appropriate although the two can be inseparable. One needs knowledge of algebra to work with calculus.

https://www.quora.com/How-is-calculu...t-from-algebra

UnhandledException 05-30-2019 08:56 AM


Originally Posted by SouthernSon (Post 1599491589)
With the number of variables I would think calculus may be more appropriate although the two can be inseparable. One needs knowledge of algebra to work with calculus.

https://www.quora.com/How-is-calculu...t-from-algebra

I am just pulling your leg:)

range96 05-30-2019 10:33 AM


Originally Posted by SouthernSon (Post 1599491589)
With the number of variables I would think calculus may be more appropriate although the two can be inseparable. One needs knowledge of algebra to work with calculus.

https://www.quora.com/How-is-calculu...t-from-algebra

What he said. :)

Any info on mpg at various (steady) speeds? We can see road racing mpg's are pretty bad. We need to add time spent with the troopers during "safety" stops into the equation. :)

Rinaldo Catria 05-30-2019 12:33 PM

https://images.app.goo.gl/ntXfvz14MXG28ZF16 I have someone working on it.

SouthernSon 05-30-2019 02:31 PM


Originally Posted by Rinaldo Catria (Post 1599493063)
https://images.app.goo.gl/ntXfvz14MXG28ZF16 I have someone working on it.

I could have done so much better in college had I had one of those! :rofl:

Higgs Boson 05-30-2019 11:35 PM

assuming:
25 at 60
20 at 75
15 at 90

which one is best?
18 gallon tank

25*18 = 450 / 2800 = 6.2 stops or 7 stops = 70 min downtime
20*18 = 360 / 2800 = 7.7 stops or 8 stops = 80 min downtime
15*18 = 270 / 2800 = 10.3 stops or 11 stops = 1100 min downtime

2800 miles
60 mph = 46.66 hrs + 70 min down = 47.82 hrs
75 mph = 37.33 hrs + 80 min down = 38.66 hrs
90 mph = 31.11 hrs + 1100 min down = 49.44 hrs

so I think it's going to be in the 80 mph range, more calculations would get you closer of course.

range96 05-30-2019 11:41 PM


Originally Posted by Higgs Boson (Post 1599497244)
assuming:
25 at 60
20 at 75
15 at 90

which one is best?
18 gallon tank

25*18 = 450 / 2800 = 6.2 stops or 7 stops = 70 min downtime
20*18 = 360 / 2800 = 7.7 stops or 8 stops = 80 min downtime
15*18 = 270 / 2800 = 10.3 stops or 11 stops = 1100 min downtime

2800 miles
60 mph = 46.66 hrs + 70 min down = 47.82 hrs
75 mph = 37.33 hrs + 80 min down = 38.66 hrs
90 mph = 31.11 hrs + 1100 min down = 49.44 hrs

so I think it's going to be in the 80 mph range, more calculations would get you closer of course.

Drop that extra zero from the 90 mph calculations and you will get a better picture.

Higgs Boson 05-31-2019 07:22 AM


Originally Posted by range96 (Post 1599497265)
Drop that extra zero from the 90 mph calculations and you will get a better picture.

lol. yes that's true. math after bedtime never works.

so 90 is 32.94 hrs, so something faster would be the answer.

however this is all based on the assumption that we know the mpg:mph ratios already.

SouthernSon 05-31-2019 11:14 AM


Originally Posted by Higgs Boson (Post 1599497244)
assuming:
25 at 60
20 at 75
15 at 90

which one is best?
18 gallon tank

25*18 = 450 / 2800 = 6.2 stops or 7 stops = 70 min downtime
20*18 = 360 / 2800 = 7.7 stops or 8 stops = 80 min downtime
15*18 = 270 / 2800 = 10.3 stops or 11 stops = 1100 min downtime

2800 miles
60 mph = 46.66 hrs + 70 min down = 47.82 hrs
75 mph = 37.33 hrs + 80 min down = 38.66 hrs
90 mph = 31.11 hrs + 1100 min down = 49.44 hrs

so I think it's going to be in the 80 mph range, more calculations would get you closer of course.

I don't think those linear calculations address the sought intersection of all the variables first mentioned in the problem.

Higgs Boson 05-31-2019 01:41 PM


Originally Posted by SouthernSon (Post 1599499308)
I don't think those linear calculations address the sought intersection of all the variables first mentioned in the problem.

what variables? the question is 100% linear as posed.

range96 05-31-2019 02:06 PM


Originally Posted by SouthernSon (Post 1599499308)
I don't think those linear calculations address the sought intersection of all the variables first mentioned in the problem.

I think that simplified method is close enough. Without exact mpg for different speeds is futile. If mpg could be provided as a function of speed a more accurate estimate (or even an exact answer) could be provided. Then again, how do you estimate time spent with the trooper when he pulls you over 100? :)

SouthernSon 05-31-2019 09:19 PM


Originally Posted by range96 (Post 1599500614)
I think that simplified method is close enough. Without exact mpg for different speeds is futile. If mpg could be provided as a function of speed a more accurate estimate (or even an exact answer) could be provided. Then again, how do you estimate time spent with the trooper when he pulls you over 100? :)

Well, there is always that. :rofl: We have the variable of number of 10 minute stops which vary with mpg which depends upon speed while speed determines total time which gets back to mph and number of 10 minute fuel stops. All of these variables are dependent upon each other and dynamic. I would think a calculus equation would address this problem very well. I really don't see anything linear. I suppose one could keep calculating equations with different values and might be able to come up to a somewhat ballpark figure but nothing more. I believe this problem would be a good exercise for someone well versed in calculus.

Higgs Boson 05-31-2019 09:26 PM


Originally Posted by SouthernSon (Post 1599502886)
Well, there is always that. :rofl: We have the variable of number of 10 minute stops which vary with mpg which depends upon speed while speed determines total time which gets back to mph and number of 10 minute fuel stops. All of these variables are dependent upon each other and dynamic. I would think a calculus equation would address this problem very well. I really don't see anything linear. I suppose one could keep calculating equations with different values and might be able to come up to a somewhat ballpark figure but nothing more. I believe this problem would be a good exercise for someone well versed in calculus.

i think you're overcomplicating it.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:45 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands