Z51 axle ratio
The Z51 package includes a performance rear axle ratio. What is that ratio and what is the basic ratio?
Thanks in advance Al |
3.62 vs 3.80
|
Pardon my ignorance but that’s not a big difference, right?
|
Depends on how you look at it. It is about 5% more torque multiplication.
|
Originally Posted by vincent_esq
(Post 1600007062)
Pardon my ignorance but that’s not a big difference, right?
|
Changes effective gear ratio across the board. Car will accelerate harder in every gear due to torque multiplication. Also makes the ratios relatively closer with less rpm drop between shifts.
|
Originally Posted by Sub Driver
(Post 1600006974)
3.62 vs 3.80
|
Originally Posted by fzust
(Post 1600007249)
Hi Sub, I've been looking for this for a while. Where did you find this info? Thanks!
|
Originally Posted by Tool Hoarder
(Post 1600007152)
Changes effective gear ratio across the board. Car will accelerate harder in every gear due to torque multiplication.
Also makes the ratios relatively closer with less rpm drop between shifts. Let us pretend 1st gear is 2.97 and that second gear is 2.17 With 3.62:1 rear gears the ratio between 1st and 2nd is 2.97/2.17 = 1.368 With 3.80:1 rear geats the ratio between 1st and 2nd is 2.97/2.17 = 1.368 Now if you shift the 3.62 geared car at 6250 RPMs you end up at 4566 RPMs in 2nd gear ....... if you shift the 3.80 geared car at 6250 RPMs you end up at 4566 RPMs in 2nd gear No difference in the ratio of the ratios. |
Originally Posted by vincent_esq
(Post 1600007062)
Pardon my ignorance but that’s not a big difference, right?
if it were that sig. then there would be lower gas mileage with Z51. |
Originally Posted by MitchAlsup
(Post 1600007257)
yes
Err, no. Let us pretend 1st gear is 2.97 and that second gear is 2.17 With 3.62:1 rear gears the ratio between 1st and 2nd is 2.97/2.17 = 1.368 With 3.80:1 rear geats the ratio between 1st and 2nd is 2.97/2.17 = 1.368 Now if you shift the 3.62 geared car at 6250 RPMs you end up at 4566 RPMs in 2nd gear ....... if you shift the 3.80 geared car at 6250 RPMs you end up at 4566 RPMs in 2nd gear No difference in the ratio of the ratios. |
Originally Posted by punky
(Post 1600007304)
Almost no difference at all. You can barely feel any didifference going from 3.50 to 3.90, 3.62 to 3.80 for get about it.
if it were that sig. then there would be lower gas mileage with Z51. |
Just going with simple math, the overall ratio ie rear diff X gear is what matters.
This works out to 10.7514 vs 11.286 for 1st gear, 7.8554 vs 8.246 for 2nd gear. |
How much fuel mileage is the z51 going to cost me? .25 mpg?
|
Originally Posted by Sub Driver
(Post 1600007364)
Wrong, it is not "almost no difference at all." Tell me how much a 5% increase in torque multiplication comes out to.
|
Originally Posted by punky
(Post 1600007756)
Oh, OK. Tell you how much difference there is between 3.62 rear ratio and 3.80? Beyond the obvious minute numerical difference the answer is real simple. Nothing any of us are going to feel. As if a 0.18 gear ratio can be perceptible. Anyone familiar with this will tell you that a gear ratio change that small is so negligible that it is not worth doing and that is whether you believe it or not or know it or not. Thanks but no thank you for the lesson Pal.
|
Originally Posted by BobRBob
(Post 1600007814)
No axe to grind here but, if it makes no difference, why do they do it?
|
Nothing!? ;)
Originally Posted by 2turbocobra
(Post 1600007685)
How much fuel mileage is the z51 going to cost me? .25 mpg?
|
I once went from 2.73's to 4.11's -- THAT difference you could feel!
|
PUNKY whats with that picture ?
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:05 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands