C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

Stock LT1 heads flowed (chart)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 02:50 PM
  #1  
cv67's Avatar
cv67
Thread Starter
Team Owner
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 81,241
Likes: 3,063
From: altered state
St. Jude Donor '05
Default Stock LT1 heads flowed (chart)

Brian Cunninghams heads freshly soda blasted and flowed...
Very similar to the #s pulled off the web, never hurts to double check it.








Heads and intake will be ported and the flowed (again) seaprately and together. Just for reference. Odd intake port shape.....
Ive seen #s printed out here but no charts yet, just curious.


Last edited by cv67; Dec 5, 2007 at 03:16 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 04:27 PM
  #2  
Orr89rocz's Avatar
Orr89rocz
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh PA
Default

does look pretty similar to stock LT1 heads i've seen...but i thought it would push closer to 205-210 on the intake side and 160-170 exhaust
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 08:19 PM
  #3  
BrianCunningham's Avatar
BrianCunningham
Team Owner
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,856
Likes: 293
From: Boston, Dallas, Detroit, SoCal, back to Boston MA
Default

Thanks for getting that done, man they cleaned up nice

This will both end of lot of debates, and start many more.

peaked at .400 lift!

Makes you wonder about putting big rockers on stock heads.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 09:11 PM
  #4  
bogus's Avatar
bogus
Team Owner
25 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Liked
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 40,156
Likes: 45
From: San Pedro CA
Default

I was looking at those numbers myself. Most interesting they dropped a bit as the lift increased.

I suspect 1.6:1 rockers are still a good idea, if only for their consistancy of manufacture.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 09:46 PM
  #5  
bobmic93's Avatar
bobmic93
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,695
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Illinois
Default

It peaked at 4 but only dropped off a few points all the way to 6500. Not to bad.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 12:46 AM
  #6  
TenSecondZ's Avatar
TenSecondZ
Advanced
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Orlando Fl
Default

Great info... Could you post the Casting # ...

The later heads flow about 5-10% more according to Lloyd Elliott.

However, the earlier castings have more meat for an all out port job, hence the requirement for an earlier casting with either Advanced Induction or LE.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 12:59 AM
  #7  
cv67's Avatar
cv67
Thread Starter
Team Owner
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 81,241
Likes: 3,063
From: altered state
St. Jude Donor '05
Default

10128374 is the casting #.

There is a large 3179 stamped above that.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 07:23 PM
  #8  
cv67's Avatar
cv67
Thread Starter
Team Owner
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 81,241
Likes: 3,063
From: altered state
St. Jude Donor '05
Default

Had one intake and one exhaust flowed just to see where things were headed. Keep in mind each port is still in need of more work, chambers are untouched with an 80k mile vavle job on them.

Still plenty of room for improvement. Gotta say the exaust ports suck on these head out of the gate.


Intake



Exhaust (on left)




Tony Mamo at AFR was kind enough to spend some time on our lo-budget drone build and put them on the bench. Due to time constraints I didnt have timr to get these "done", but does give an idea of where wer'e at and what needs more attention.


The same port that was flowed before unported was flowed only this time it was done with a fixture in the intake to mimic a perfect entry (such as a ported intake ), and flowing the exhaust with a pipe. interesting to see the difference..

Below is the first shops results without those two items and the top line of the intake/exhaust on the AFR sheet also shows the same ports flowed with these differences. This is why having heads flowed at two different places can have 2 different results..Weve all seen these threads that result in flame wars, heres why.





+1 cfm @.200





Here is Tony in action




Wanted to thank Tony again for his time with our stuff.
-The Sheepster

Last edited by cv67; Dec 21, 2007 at 08:32 PM.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 10:59 PM
  #9  
VenkmanP's Avatar
VenkmanP
Safety Car
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,793
Likes: 9
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by BrianCunningham
peaked at .400 lift!

Makes you wonder about putting big rockers on stock heads.
These do peak sooner than the other stock flow numbers I've seen, but why would it make you wonder about big lift? This flow sheet shows what we already know from real world results - that stock unported LT1 heads will support a lot more lift than the stock cam+rockers provide.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 11:55 PM
  #10  
Curveit's Avatar
Curveit
Drifting
20 Year Member
Veteran: Army
Active Streak: 30 Days
Active Streak: 60 Days
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 2
From: San Antonio Texas
Default

and, that while the stock port flows 215 @.400, it flows 211 from around .380 on up to at least .550. So, with whatever cam duration you have, the port will be flowing nearly at its max, for more of that avaliable time.

Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 12:03 AM
  #11  
cv67's Avatar
cv67
Thread Starter
Team Owner
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 81,241
Likes: 3,063
From: altered state
St. Jude Donor '05
Default

More pics to come next week, betting the intake is now on its way to 270 and exhaust surpassing the 190 mark, still on stock valve size. We will see. Goal is to keep the intake runner as small as possible while acheiving this, not easy. Time, time, and more time.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 01:04 AM
  #12  
Greg Gore's Avatar
Greg Gore
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,841
Likes: 19
From: CLT, North Carolina
Default

Look at the valve seats. The throat cut and how it is blended might respond to a change and show an increase. The port is peaking too soon, it should be capable of more flow than that. The drop after the peak at .400 was because the port is developing turbulance in the area of the valve seat. Rocker ratio increases lift under the curve and rate of acceleration of the valve off the seat. Comparing lifts at the valve with a degree wheel on the c/shaft will show increases everywhere not just peak lift.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 12:38 PM
  #13  
bobmic93's Avatar
bobmic93
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,695
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by cuisinartvette
More pics to come next week, betting the intake is now on its way to 270 and exhaust surpassing the 190 mark, still on stock valve size. We will see. Goal is to keep the intake runner as small as possible while acheiving this, not easy. Time, time, and more time.
Port velocity is important to keep that low end grunt.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2008 | 03:16 AM
  #14  
cv67's Avatar
cv67
Thread Starter
Team Owner
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 81,241
Likes: 3,063
From: altered state
St. Jude Donor '05
Default


I may wind up giving some up to get the bigger #s. Honestly I feel that whats there already is good enough for a mild 350 on the street.

Havent had tiem to mess with them lately, went to plan B. More to come...
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2008 | 06:40 PM
  #15  
Kevin Woods's Avatar
Kevin Woods
Racer
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio Texas
Default

Originally Posted by BrianCunningham
.......peaked at .400 lift! Makes you wonder about putting big rockers on stock heads.
Why would you say that?

What often gets lost on people is that in addition to producing more valve lift, the 1.6 rockers also increases the effective duration of the cam !

KW
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2008 | 06:41 PM
  #16  
comp's Avatar
comp
Team Owner
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 88,393
Likes: 2
From: eville in
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin Woods
Why would you say that?

What often gets lost on people is that in addition to producing more valve lift, the 1.6 rockers also increases the effective duration of the cam !

KW
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2008 | 02:52 AM
  #17  
Curveit's Avatar
Curveit
Drifting
20 Year Member
Veteran: Army
Active Streak: 30 Days
Active Streak: 60 Days
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 2
From: San Antonio Texas
Default

I personally add 2* @ .050 going 1.5 to 1.6 rockers

Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Stock LT1 heads flowed (chart)

Old Feb 16, 2008 | 03:16 AM
  #18  
racebum's Avatar
racebum
Race Director
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 16,028
Likes: 170
From: oregon
Default

same numbers almost to the T as the 113 casting. After some cartrage rolls, better valves {still stock size} i was able to get a set of 113s up to 231@.500 and 190@.500, mid lift gained similar percentages of +15-20% Probably had 8-10 hours in the set. The neat thing about 1.94/1.50 valves is they rev a few hundred rpm higher than 2.02 1.60s with the same spring. Those heads cleaned up great, did you ever consider tinkering out in your shop to pick up the flow? basic porting isn't as hard to learn as some people will have you think.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 01:08 PM
  #19  
Daniel DK's Avatar
Daniel DK
Burning Brakes
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin Woods
Why would you say that?

What often gets lost on people is that in addition to producing more valve lift, the 1.6 rockers also increases the effective duration of the cam !

KW
So i guess skipping the 1.6 rockers and getting a cam with more duration would be a wiser choice? less valvetrain movement = better/cheaper high rpm ability?
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 02:46 PM
  #20  
Curveit's Avatar
Curveit
Drifting
20 Year Member
Veteran: Army
Active Streak: 30 Days
Active Streak: 60 Days
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 2
From: San Antonio Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Daniel DK
So i guess skipping the 1.6 rockers and getting a cam with more duration would be a wiser choice? less valvetrain movement = better/cheaper high rpm ability?
1.6 Rockers aren't gonna decrease your RPM abilities. Many motors run 1.7-1.8 stock (LS, BBC, Ford Cleve, etc.). Pure race motors sometimes run even higher; think 2.0. Whatever Cam you got, 1.6 are going to lift the valve higher, lift it quicker, and hold it open longer.
383s and bigger strokers can rev plenty high. 8-8500 if you've got the parts, and a good balance, to support it. If you're talking about 15-18000 then you might want a 2" or smaller stroke crank.

Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE