When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Personally, I don't care which of the three is a tiny bit better than the other on the track. These mostly meaningless measurements (within a range, of course) are only designed to sell magazines and get the fanboys all atwitter.
That's true too. Ever noticed why R&T, Motor Trend, C&D, etc never print just a 2-page pamphlet chock full of dry performance stats and nothing else? It's because nobody would buy it. People like looking at cars, and sports cars have another appeal as well. They like hearing them, through online content. Magazines like Evo, TopGear, and Car have published many multiple car comparos without even a single 0-60 stat being measured. What sells for them is stunning photography and a narrative of how the cars compare within a context that is more relevant to more people: on the road.
Let's face it. Most people will buy the best sports car they can AFFORD.
Ergo, the Vette is going to sell a boat load more units than the other two.
So to have it play in the league of cars 3 - 8 times it's MSRP is pretty darn awesome.
Who really gives a rats behind about what magazines think anyway?!?
They did not say the 911 was more visceral. If that's what they were looking for, I think it's clear the F12 would have won. They said the 911 was slightly more confidence inspiring on the track and never inspires fear, never makes a mistake, always perfectly sorted, etc. I think you could argue that's almost the opposite of visceral, and that the 991 is so close to perfect that it takes the fun out of it.
I haven't been able to watch the video, but the written comparison was great. I think when you consider the parameters of the comparison (i.e. best subjective driver's car regardless of any other factors) and the extremely capable and desirable competition, this is about as close to a win for the C7 as you're going to get. And even considering those things, it sounds like the C7 was judged to be very very nearly as good as the 911.
I watched the video and to me the comments where more like a comparison between 4wd and RWD. I don't see how a car with 4WD is considered more of a drivers car when compared to a RWD. It's really apples to oranges because AWD cars handle so much differently. No matter what you are going to have to work more with a rear wheel drive car and how you manage it around the turn with throttle, breaking, etc. makes it more of a drivers car than just relying on AWD where they can barely break the car loose in the video. It just seems like a ridiculous comparison, particularly when the vette was faster in every category, had the best steering feel and costs half of the price of the 911. If you want to say the 911 4s is more refined I can understand that, but not the better driver's car.
And how about that...3.7 second 0-60 (although they list 3.9 in the data matrix...perhaps a typo as there are a few others) 12.0 at 118.4 mph through the quarter, over .7 faster than the Porsche around LS and .2 behind the F12.
Nice.
S.
and 60-0 in 95 feet, shortest of the three cars....
and 60-0 in 95 feet, shortest of the three cars....
We also know from the Edmunds comparison that the Corvette has considerably higher skid pad grip and slalom speed than the 911 (and I'm sure the F12 as well).
Here a relatively low TECH vette set-up beat a state of the art Porsche overall! Therefore they/we don't need the expensive high TECH CC-brakes and DCT in a larger Z06 (>600HP) to beat the turbo. And again the ACR proved it first!
(Or the ZR1s Ring Time!)
Last edited by johnglenntwo; Sep 30, 2013 at 07:31 PM.
I watched the video and to me the comments where more like a comparison between 4wd and RWD. I don't see how a car with 4WD is considered more of a drivers car when compared to a RWD. It's really apples to oranges because AWD cars handle so much differently. No matter what you are going to have to work more with a rear wheel drive car and how you manage it around the turn with throttle, breaking, etc. makes it more of a drivers car than just relying on AWD where they can barely break the car loose in the video. It just seems like a ridiculous comparison, particularly when the vette was faster in every category, had the best steering feel and costs half of the price of the 911. If you want to say the 911 4s is more refined I can understand that, but not the better driver's car.
Read the 2012 Best Drivers Car, the C2S did even better than the C4S, it always does with good drivers. To me the AWD did not help the Porsche, if something the C2S would have done better.
I watched the video and to me the comments where more like a comparison between 4wd and RWD. I don't see how a car with 4WD is considered more of a drivers car when compared to a RWD. It's really apples to oranges because AWD cars handle so much differently. No matter what you are going to have to work more with a rear wheel drive car and how you manage it around the turn with throttle, breaking, etc. makes it more of a drivers car than just relying on AWD where they can barely break the car loose in the video. It just seems like a ridiculous comparison, particularly when the vette was faster in every category, had the best steering feel and costs half of the price of the 911. If you want to say the 911 4s is more refined I can understand that, but not the better driver's car.
Right. I'm surprised no one else has made this comment including myself. The vid would have been more interesting with a GT3. There are so many electronic interventions on all sports cars these days, it is hard to tell what they are really like. I think if you removed the ediff and those tires and those e shocks, the C7 may not do as well. The GT3 has so much e intervention that it gives a false sense of security. a Viper would do well with all that stuff also.
The same reason why a BRZ is so much fun to drive. None of us do laps for money and championships, we do them for fun. And most don't spend much time even doing that.
So really feel is more important than the stopwatch in this case.
Read the 2012 Best Drivers Car, the C2S did even better than the C4S, it always does with good drivers. To me the AWD did not help the Porsche, if something the C2S would have done better.
In a standing still acceleration the C2S was better but on lap time the C4S is better, AWD doing its magic.
Great result for the Corvette and good writeup, though the road test portion was a bit skimpy on info.
So they had the production handling parameters all loaded up and ready to go...yet decided not to use it. Is Ralph working for GM now? You were hyping everything up with your "sworn to secrecy" and "It will certainly be a one way street towards the C7 and not the other way around." While I think some people will be moved toward the C7, it's not necessarily a one-way street as those who have aspired to own a 911 will continue to do so. Those with crazy money will pick one of each. Funny how it's a one-way street to Corvette, but no one here wants to acknowledge that the Porsche, costing only slightly more than 1/3rd of the Ferrari's price, lapped in a very similar time. It's not the "dominating" figure you were claiming and Motor Trend spells this out: "However, it's not radically ahead of the 140-lb-ft-torque-deficient AWD 911."
Claims by others of "5 seconds faster at VIR or Laguna Seca" now rest entirely on VIR, as the difference at LS was only 0.72s.
I knew the minute that Corvette matched the F12 at Laguna that this car was a rock star. At the end it was essentially a full minute ahead of the 911 which is an eternity at Laguna. They told me that the steering was better than the 911 and that the handling was a toss up. The car did not have the latest suspension settings since it was a pre-production car on display at Laguna all weekend. The engineers reset the new software settings and immediatly went out and matched the F-car. On one hot lap I watched what Porsche does best, swap ends and spin out at turn 11 after entering too hot. Wait until the ZO6 and the ZR1 come out. It's got to have Porsche shaking in their boots.
From: Calgary, AB. There's a reason why white was the only color offered on every year Corvette. Proud Canadian German Jamaican!
St. Jude Donor '09, '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17
I love all the Corvette Kool Aid drinkers in here. Newsflash, the Corvette isn't the best sports car in the world..........
Who cares if the C7 came in second, bashing Porsche makes no sense to me, why because they didn't choose which 911 to use in this comparison MT did. Obviously, well to me anyways, they chose these three to represent 3 different segments of sports cars, not because they wanted them to be as closely matched as possible. Like I've always said, manufacturers and magazines for that matter compare theirs and other cars to the Corvette, not the other way around, be happy with that.
And is there a camera mounted in the front bumper of the 911?
I love all the Corvette Kool Aid drinkers in here. Newsflash, the Corvette isn't the best sports car in the world..........
Who cares if the C7 came in second, bashing Porsche makes no sense to me, why because they didn't choose which 911 to use in this comparison MT did. Obviously, well to me anyways, they chose these three to represent 3 different segments of sports cars, not because they wanted them to be as closely matched as possible. Like I've always said, manufacturers and magazines for that matter compare theirs and other cars to the Corvette, not the other way around, be happy with that.
And is there a camera mounted in the front bumper of the 911?
For some people the Corvette is the best sports car in the world, for them anyway. It's possible they have different priorities than you/others do.
From: Calgary, AB. There's a reason why white was the only color offered on every year Corvette. Proud Canadian German Jamaican!
St. Jude Donor '09, '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17
Originally Posted by DREAMERAK
For some people the Corvette is the best sports car in the world, for them anyway. It's possible they have different priorities than you/others do.
of course it is but to bash a car that clearly is just as good if not better is just plain lunacy, some people just can't admit to having an inferior product and that's sad. I know my C7 w/Z51 isn't as good as a lot of sports cars out there, but that doesn't mean I'm going to put those ones down.
What I will say is that there is not one car available in North America or the world for that matter, that comes straight from the factory, that is a better all around sports car for the same price or lower than the C7.
And don't forget, opinions are subjective, a fact is a fact, a five dollar bill is not worth more than a 20 dollar bill of the same currency.
I love all the Corvette Kool Aid drinkers in here. Newsflash, the Corvette isn't the best sports car in the world..........
Who cares if the C7 came in second, bashing Porsche makes no sense to me, why because they didn't choose which 911 to use in this comparison MT did. Obviously, well to me anyways, they chose these three to represent 3 different segments of sports cars, not because they wanted them to be as closely matched as possible. Like I've always said, manufacturers and magazines for that matter compare theirs and other cars to the Corvette, not the other way around, be happy with that.
And is there a camera mounted in the front bumper of the 911?
I'm not bashing the Porsche. It came in last in the track times and last in the 1/4 mile. That's MT's own numbers.
What I'm bashing is the opinion of the "reporters" that it's the best driving car. Their idea of "best driving" is a no drama experience that makes you feel better than you are.
To me, that doesn't make a car the best drivers car. A car that makes you feel special is the best drivers car.
The F12 and the Vette do that all day long over the 911.