C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

L-79 "CE" block main bearings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-2009, 03:41 PM
  #1  
66since71
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
66since71's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,660
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default L-79 "CE" block main bearings

Any way to tell main bearing size on my L-79 (327/350hp) "CE" replacement short block, without pulling the oil pan?

numbers are:

stamp pad: CEOA 18352
block cast date: L239 (Dec 23, 69?)
Block casting number: 3959512
also stamped (assembly date code?): 106 S3991

Oil pan is the original '66 pan. (I am afraid that alone may be my answer? But I am hoping for large mains.)

Thanks for any help... (Working on engine options again!)

Harry
Old 04-02-2009, 04:05 PM
  #2  
Vet65te
Le Mans Master
 
Vet65te's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Prescott Arizona
Posts: 5,273
Received 1,032 Likes on 671 Posts

Default Mortec.com

Harry, you might want to double check that cast date number. If that block casting number is correct, it's unlikely that the last number on the date is a '9'. I had that same CE block in a 66 Coupe and in my 61 Vette now and both of them happened to be dated '63.
Mortec.com has that block cast number listed as follows:
3959512....327...62-67...2...Was also used for some "CE" replacement blocks
I believe the larger main bearing journal smallblocks didn't start till '68 so your CE engine is the small journal variety.
Mike T.
Old 04-02-2009, 04:54 PM
  #3  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

AFAIK, there were no CE engines produced to replace '66 model engines. '67 and later with the 5/50 warranty. Also, AFAIK, the replacement CE short blocks were manufactured to original specs so if your engine was to replace a '67 engine, it would have the small mains. If it was to replace the '68 engine, it would have the large ones. Taking a guess, if the block has the rear breather, it's probably a small main '67 replacement.

I don't know anything about those number except the casting, forging dates. They can be several years after the original engine usage but should still be a direct replacement for what was there to start with.
Old 04-02-2009, 05:23 PM
  #4  
Mike Ward
Race Director
 
Mike Ward's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2001
Posts: 15,892
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

This presumes that the engine in question was built to replace the original engine in the car- is there paperwork to indicate this?
Old 04-02-2009, 05:58 PM
  #5  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike Ward
This presumes that the engine in question was built to replace the original engine in the car- is there paperwork to indicate this?
The only SBC with the large mains and the rear breather was the '67 Camero 350 block.

There's actually a number of assumptions that could be made here and the only sure fire way to ID the size of the mains is to LOOK at them.

Last edited by MikeM; 04-02-2009 at 06:05 PM.
Old 04-02-2009, 09:07 PM
  #6  
66since71
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
66since71's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,660
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Thanks for all the feedback..

Mike T: I'm sure on the casting date. I bought the engine in 1975 from Mustang Chevrolet in San angelo Texas, so a 1969 casting date is not unreasonable. At the time the parts books listed the p/n I ordered as the correct 350 hp short block assembly for my '66. Thanks for the Mortec reference.

Mike M: good point on the intended use. I recall that the engine was to replace all 350 hp 327's. Wasn't the 68 motor a 327? If so, is it possible.......

Mike W: I ordered this engine, and at the time I confirmed that it was the correct listed part number for my car. So I'm fairly sure about its intended application.

My engine builder has a long history at Chevrolet in engine development. He thinks, based on when I bought the motor, there is a fair chance its a large journal motor. We are just trying to figure it out as we plan the next steps in this process.

Finally, you don't need to be named Mike to respond to this post!

Harry
Old 04-02-2009, 09:12 PM
  #7  
muncieman
Burning Brakes
 
muncieman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2001
Location: Frederick Md
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 66since71
Thanks for all the feedback..

Mike T: I'm sure on the casting date. I bought the engine in 1975 from Mustang Chevrolet in San angelo Texas, so a 1969 casting date is not unreasonable. At the time the parts books listed the p/n I ordered as the correct 350 hp short block assembly for my '66. Thanks for the Mortec reference.

Mike M: good point on the intended use. I recall that the engine was to replace all 350 hp 327's. Wasn't the 68 motor a 327? If so, is it possible.......

Mike W: I ordered this engine, and at the time I confirmed that it was the correct listed part number for my car. So I'm fairly sure about its intended application.

My engine builder has a long history at Chevrolet in engine development. He thinks, based on when I bought the motor, there is a fair chance its a large journal motor. We are just trying to figure it out as we plan the next steps in this process.

Finally, you don't need to be named Mike to respond to this post!

Harry
I kind of like the small journal motors, less bearing speed, lighter assembly. Is there some reason you want the bigger crank???
Old 04-02-2009, 09:20 PM
  #8  
66since71
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
66since71's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,660
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by muncieman
I kind of like the small journal motors, less bearing speed, lighter assembly. Is there some reason you want the bigger crank???
Wally, we are talking about a 383 using the existing block. He likes the larger bearings in that application. We've talked about a 30 over 350 in the same block, and he's OK with the small journal in that application. There may also be some availability issues with 383 cranks for the small journal block.

Harry
Old 04-02-2009, 09:30 PM
  #9  
Vet65te
Le Mans Master
 
Vet65te's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Prescott Arizona
Posts: 5,273
Received 1,032 Likes on 671 Posts

Default

Harry, does your CE block have the rear breather hole?
Old 04-02-2009, 09:48 PM
  #10  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 66since71
Mike M: good point on the intended use. I recall that the engine was to replace all 350 hp 327's. Wasn't the 68 motor a 327? If so, is it possible.......


Harry
The '68 replacement engine will not have the rear breather and will have the large main bearings. The '67 replacement engine will have the rear breather and the small main bearings.

It's that simple.
Old 04-02-2009, 11:06 PM
  #11  
oldskydog
Racer
 
oldskydog's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Mesa Az
Posts: 338
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

The 3959512 was areplacement casting for the out of production small journal 327 block beginning in late 68 early 69 when the CE program started. Any replacement engines/blocks before that time would have used current production engines/blocks. After 69, those small journal blocks were no longer in production. GM recast the small journal blocks with new casting numbers to service the small journal requirements.
3959532 283 PASS/TRUCK CE
3959534 283 Chevy II/Nova CE
3959512 327 PASS/TRUCK 327 CE
3959538 327 Chevy II/Nova CE
Old 04-03-2009, 06:32 AM
  #12  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by oldskydog

Any replacement engines/blocks before that time would have used current production engines/blocks.

I don't believe this is a true statement if you're implying that a '68 replacement block, for example, was released from parts to replace a '67engine in service.
Old 04-03-2009, 09:24 AM
  #13  
66since71
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
66since71's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,660
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Vet65te
Harry, does your CE block have the rear breather hole?
Mike, yes it does.

Originally Posted by MikeM
The '68 replacement engine will not have the rear breather and will have the large main bearings. The '67 replacement engine will have the rear breather and the small main bearings.

It's that simple.
Mike M, I have the rear breather and I was hoping it wasn't (that simple). Apparently the things that make it large or small journal are defined when the block is machined, not necessarily when its cast. My engine was likely assembled in the early 70's, when there would have been a large journal crank for the 68 327, hence the question.

OldSkyDog, thanks for the info on castings. It does make sense, that prior to the CE program, service blocks would be pulled from regular production.

Harry
Old 04-03-2009, 11:49 AM
  #14  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 66since71
It does make sense, that prior to the CE program, service blocks would be pulled from regular production.

Harry

Only if it's a direct fit. The '68 block is not a direct fit for the '67 engine. You could still buy service rear vent engines that were assembled, '62-'67, as normal production up into the late '60's, early '70's. Even complete engines.

I think the intended use for the CE's were to track warranty only and were not intended for general OTC purchase for service. That's not to say that didn't happen because it did. After the 5/50 warranty program expired, the leftover CE engines were put up for retail sale by dealers at big discounts to get rid of them.

I believe there is more meat down around the main webs with the larger main blocks also. It's not just machining.

Last edited by MikeM; 04-03-2009 at 12:09 PM.
Old 04-03-2009, 12:03 PM
  #15  
AZDoug
Race Director
 
AZDoug's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Camp Verde AZ
Posts: 12,434
Received 1,478 Likes on 905 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
2017 C1 of Year Finalist

Default

The new L79 shortblock I purchased direct from a Chev dealer in late 1976 was a 512 CE block, cast March 1970.

It was a bargain at about $350

They are small journals for sure.

Doug

Last edited by AZDoug; 04-03-2009 at 12:05 PM.
Old 04-03-2009, 12:07 PM
  #16  
oldskydog
Racer
 
oldskydog's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Mesa Az
Posts: 338
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MikeM
I don't believe this is a true statement if you're implying that a '68 replacement block, for example, was released from parts to replace a '67engine in service.
What I'm saying is that when they went to the large journal blocks in 68, they still had some stock of small journal blocks for service but when those ran out, and since they were dropping the 327 for regular production in 69, they came up with the CE program and new casting numbers to service the out-of-production small journal block requirements.
Old 04-03-2009, 12:19 PM
  #17  
66since71
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
66since71's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,660
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AZDoug
The new L79 shortblock I purchased direct from a Chev dealer in late 1976 was a 512 CE block, cast March 1970.

It was a bargain at about $350

They are small journals for sure.

Doug
Doug, somewhere in my memory, I thought maybe you'd already looked at this. Thanks for the feedback.

Harry

Last edited by 66since71; 04-03-2009 at 12:22 PM.

Get notified of new replies

To L-79 "CE" block main bearings

Old 04-03-2009, 02:04 PM
  #18  
JohnZ
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
JohnZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes on 1,100 Posts

Default

The "CE" number says that engine was machined/assembled in 1970.
Old 05-22-2018, 10:18 AM
  #19  
Marty Mischenko
2nd Gear
 
Marty Mischenko's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2018
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So I have a large gernal 327 that when I pulled the heads off all 8 pistons where stamped 90? Anyone know what this means?

Last edited by Marty Mischenko; 05-22-2018 at 10:24 AM.
Old 05-22-2018, 04:19 PM
  #20  
Robert61
Safety Car
 
Robert61's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2016
Location: Olive branch Ms
Posts: 4,617
Received 1,534 Likes on 1,067 Posts
Default

If you familiarize yourself with the crank flanges. On the rear you'll be able to tell if it's a big or small journal. The 327 sj crank is round with 2 notches. The LG crank flange is different.


Quick Reply: L-79 "CE" block main bearings



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:16 AM.