Notices
C5 General General C5 Corvette and C5 Z06 Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

[Z06] Ported heads horsepower expectation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-17-2017, 10:27 AM
  #1  
NosLaser
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
NosLaser's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: South FL
Posts: 6,957
Received 63 Likes on 49 Posts

Default Ported heads horsepower expectation

Car in question is an '01 Z and already has the following mods:

XS 1 3/4" LTs
off road X
titanium bypass exhaust
Ed Curtis streetsweeper HT cam
stock fast 78mm intake
stock ported throttle body
ATI 10% UD damper
all the requisite supporting mods (springs, pushrods, etc)

Car made 420/402 in 93 degree humid Florida summer heat

I want to send out my heads for the PRC stage 1 porting (only difference between that and the stage 2.5 is stainless valves; flow numbers nearly identical and I plan on milling the heads so I don't want PTV issues)
Heads milled to 59cc chambers (with .056" compressed gasket should yield 11.1:1ish compression)
Proper length pushrods
Vengeance racing ported Fast 78mm intake (since I already have it)
Fresh dyno tune

Anyone have any idea where I may end up horsepower wise? Could i see almost 460 out of that setup?
Old 02-18-2017, 03:39 PM
  #2  
zeevette
Race Director
 
zeevette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Pasco WA
Posts: 10,807
Received 288 Likes on 235 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NosLaser
Car in question is an '01 Z and already has the following mods:

XS 1 3/4" LTs
off road X
titanium bypass exhaust
Ed Curtis streetsweeper HT cam
stock fast 78mm intake
stock ported throttle body
ATI 10% UD damper
all the requisite supporting mods (springs, pushrods, etc)

Car made 420/402 in 93 degree humid Florida summer heat

I want to send out my heads for the PRC stage 1 porting (only difference between that and the stage 2.5 is stainless valves; flow numbers nearly identical and I plan on milling the heads so I don't want PTV issues)
Heads milled to 59cc chambers (with .056" compressed gasket should yield 11.1:1ish compression)
Proper length pushrods
Vengeance racing ported Fast 78mm intake (since I already have it)
Fresh dyno tune

Anyone have any idea where I may end up horsepower wise? Could i see almost 460 out of that setup?
I think you'd be closer to 440-450 with a Stg. 1 porting/milling. If you want to max out your potential, spend the money on either (first choice) Trickflow 215s, which are already CNC'd, and will present less PTV issues, or (2nd choice) get your stock heads done at TEA, or AI. Another thing you could do yourself, is home port the FAST manifold. It's pretty easy.
Old 02-20-2017, 08:38 AM
  #3  
NosLaser
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
NosLaser's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: South FL
Posts: 6,957
Received 63 Likes on 49 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by zeevette
I think you'd be closer to 440-450 with a Stg. 1 porting/milling. If you want to max out your potential, spend the money on either (first choice) Trickflow 215s, which are already CNC'd, and will present less PTV issues, or (2nd choice) get your stock heads done at TEA, or AI. Another thing you could do yourself, is home port the FAST manifold. It's pretty easy.
Only reason I'd shy away from the TFS heads is simply because I have 1 3/4" long tubes and my cam I don't believe would bring the full potential out of those heads. I'd rather be on the "faster" end of a smaller setup than on the "slower" end of a wilder setup if that makes sense.

"Oh you have trickflow heads and only make xyz horsepower?" due to not having some big donkey dick cam.

I'd rather the car be able to run a pretty decent number at the track and when I tell people they are only stage one stock ported heads, it will seem more impressive. Just my take on it.
Old 02-20-2017, 02:37 PM
  #4  
zeevette
Race Director
 
zeevette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Pasco WA
Posts: 10,807
Received 288 Likes on 235 Posts

Default

I , too have 1.75" LG headers, and they are plenty large enough for a 346, even with supercharging. Not an issue. I don't know what specs your "named" cam are, but I was very happy with my first cam. (Crane 228-232@112+5, and .600/.600 lift) I only recommend TFs because of the outstanding outcome (NA) with a smallish cam. 483/432RW SAE. I also had the heads milled to 61cc for more compression, and they were hand finished by Brian Tooley about 8 years ago. I've since added an A&A Vortech, and changed cam to a 224-234@116, and sold my ported FAST, EWP, and UD pulley, going back to stock parts. The headers are handling it just fine.
The following users liked this post:
NosLaser (02-20-2017)
Old 02-20-2017, 02:46 PM
  #5  
NosLaser
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
NosLaser's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: South FL
Posts: 6,957
Received 63 Likes on 49 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by zeevette
I , too have 1.75" LG headers, and they are plenty large enough for a 346, even with supercharging. Not an issue. I don't know what specs your "named" cam are, but I was very happy with my first cam. (Crane 228-232@112+5, and .600/.600 lift) I only recommend TFs because of the outstanding outcome (NA) with a smallish cam. 483/432RW SAE. I also had the heads milled to 61cc for more compression, and they were hand finished by Brian Tooley about 8 years ago. I've since added an A&A Vortech, and changed cam to a 224-234@116, and sold my ported FAST, EWP, and UD pulley, going back to stock parts. The headers are handling it just fine.
Good to know

Cam specs are 228*-232*-111*-.612"-.600"
Old 02-20-2017, 05:57 PM
  #6  
bikeriderga
Melting Slicks
 
bikeriderga's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 2,424
Received 196 Likes on 159 Posts

Default

I would agree with Zee here.
The following users liked this post:
NosLaser (02-21-2017)
Old 02-21-2017, 08:40 AM
  #7  
NosLaser
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
NosLaser's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: South FL
Posts: 6,957
Received 63 Likes on 49 Posts

Default

Only argument I could really make is from the perspective of cost. With 346 cubes and my cam, the car is only going to make so much power.

The PRC heads are going to cost me $750. Trickflows are ~1300 plus the cost of rockers (or the upgrade required to use stockers) and plus the cost of machine work to have them milled for my desired application.

With the PRC heads I'll make 450's to maybe 460 if the stars and planets align, with the trickflows I'll make 470-480ish.

To me, all things considered, I don't know if double the cost is really worth it, but my mind may change.
Old 02-21-2017, 04:22 PM
  #8  
zeevette
Race Director
 
zeevette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Pasco WA
Posts: 10,807
Received 288 Likes on 235 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NosLaser
Only argument I could really make is from the perspective of cost. With 346 cubes and my cam, the car is only going to make so much power.

The PRC heads are going to cost me $750. Trickflows are ~1300 plus the cost of rockers (or the upgrade required to use stockers) and plus the cost of machine work to have them milled for my desired application.

With the PRC heads I'll make 450's to maybe 460 if the stars and planets align, with the trickflows I'll make 470-480ish.

To me, all things considered, I don't know if double the cost is really worth it, but my mind may change.


Everything comes down to a cost vs sort of deal. I've never had PRC heads, so I can't comment of your results. I think you'll like the cam you chose.
The following users liked this post:
NosLaser (02-23-2017)
Old 05-29-2017, 09:10 AM
  #9  
NosLaser
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
NosLaser's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: South FL
Posts: 6,957
Received 63 Likes on 49 Posts

Default

Sorry to revive my older thread, but if I were to go with a set of AFR 205's, could I reuse my existing lunati dual valvesprings and reuse my stock rockers?

Been in talks with Ed Curtis (the supplier of my cam) regarding some head porting that will best match the cam I have, but I'd consider a set of AFR's if they are more of a bolt on deal without the downtime, and if the cost isn't too crazy different.

Box stock AFR's outperform ported 243's?
Old 05-30-2017, 04:59 AM
  #10  
zeevette
Race Director
 
zeevette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Pasco WA
Posts: 10,807
Received 288 Likes on 235 Posts

Default

AFR 205s are also CNC'd, and they will out perform stock 243. Even better are ones done by Tony Mamo. They can come with good, or better springs, so switching isn't needed. I still prefer the TFS, and they offer a really good alternative in the 220 "as cast" configuration that are also less expensive.
Old 05-30-2017, 11:34 PM
  #11  
Scotty2000SS
Pro
 
Scotty2000SS's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2015
Location: Roseville California
Posts: 642
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Honestly I would sell the fast 78 and go fast 102/NW 102. You'll pick up huge with the cam you're running. I ported my 102 myself and it gained big. I followed this thread. It's not the normal "porting" that vengeance does.

https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...g-results.html
Old 06-02-2017, 02:46 PM
  #12  
zeevette
Race Director
 
zeevette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Pasco WA
Posts: 10,807
Received 288 Likes on 235 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Scotty2000SS
Honestly I would sell the fast 78 and go fast 102/NW 102. You'll pick up huge with the cam you're running. I ported my 102 myself and it gained big. I followed this thread. It's not the normal "porting" that vengeance does.

https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...g-results.html


You have big cubic inches, (454!!). which benefit from the larger manifold. A FAST 78 only works with the 3 bolt TB, but the larger FAST' need a LS2 type 4 bolt. For NOS setup, I think a 90 or 92 would be more balanced, negating the need for cowl modifications. It would require a LS2 TB, which I found new for only $200. Just my .02.
Old 06-02-2017, 03:07 PM
  #13  
NosLaser
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
NosLaser's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: South FL
Posts: 6,957
Received 63 Likes on 49 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by zeevette
You have big cubic inches, (454!!). which benefit from the larger manifold. A FAST 78 only works with the 3 bolt TB, but the larger FAST' need a LS2 type 4 bolt. For NOS setup, I think a 90 or 92 would be more balanced, negating the need for cowl modifications. It would require a LS2 TB, which I found new for only $200. Just my .02.
In his defense, that thread was made for reference, that isn't his car. If you look in the "Performance Results" section and find the thread on the 442 rwhp bolt on car you will see his results with the NW102/Fast 102 combo on stock cubes.

I'm skeptical on the numbers but if the track times end up supporting his numbers then that would tell the tale of the larger 102 intake's efficacy on even stock cam cars.
Old 06-02-2017, 04:22 PM
  #14  
Scotty2000SS
Pro
 
Scotty2000SS's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2015
Location: Roseville California
Posts: 642
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NosLaser
In his defense, that thread was made for reference, that isn't his car. If you look in the "Performance Results" section and find the thread on the 442 rwhp bolt on car you will see his results with the NW102/Fast 102 combo on stock cubes.

I'm skeptical on the numbers but if the track times end up supporting his numbers then that would tell the tale of the larger 102 intake's efficacy on even stock cam cars.
Thanks for the props

I'm going to the track tonight
Old 06-02-2017, 04:43 PM
  #15  
NosLaser
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
NosLaser's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: South FL
Posts: 6,957
Received 63 Likes on 49 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Scotty2000SS
Thanks for the props

I'm going to the track tonight
See just cause I'm skeptical and slightly sarcastic doesn't mean I'm a dick

Good luck, keep us posted on the results.
Old 06-06-2017, 10:45 PM
  #16  
Dave70
Racer
 
Dave70's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2012
Posts: 284
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The PRC's are a great bang for the buck head. I had them on my 99 WS6 with a MS3 cam. Had that top end on the stock LS1 and put it on a 6.0 after a spun rod bearing. Great heads for the cost. I had the stage 2.5 milled .30
Old 06-16-2017, 01:24 AM
  #17  
cv67
Team Owner
 
cv67's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: altered state
Posts: 81,242
Received 3,043 Likes on 2,602 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05

Default

nothing wrong with skepticsm at all.....give mamo a buzz he will give you the straight scoop on either one & break things down so they make sense.
(Have no idea what stage 1 is so cant comment)
He definitely knows how to make power and keep things acting/sounding tame.
Old 06-16-2017, 11:41 AM
  #18  
radar502
Safety Car
 
radar502's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Birmingham Al
Posts: 3,938
Received 289 Likes on 222 Posts

Default 04 z 445 whhp

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cm-U...ature=youtu.be )04 LS-6 Comp harden cam ( there is a difference ) 230/236 595/595 112-4 home ported stock heads the intakes just cleaned up the exhaust open up ,if you don't know what your doing do try this at home ,I have been doing it for years .. Kools headers X-pipe GHL ..LMR tuned in Houston TX 445 at the wheels .. Run very good on the street not 600-800 HP but fun ride ..

Get notified of new replies

To Ported heads horsepower expectation




Quick Reply: [Z06] Ported heads horsepower expectation



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33 AM.