Notices
C4 General Discussion General C4 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech

1992 Base Bilstein vs Bilstein Z51

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2017, 12:33 PM
  #1  
lilfish419
Heel & Toe
Thread Starter
 
lilfish419's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 1992 Base Bilstein vs Bilstein Z51

Can anyone tell me if I can use the Bilstein Z51 shocks on my 1992 w/o having a Z51 equipped package? Car does not have the optional ride selective option. Thanks
Old 10-19-2017, 12:59 PM
  #2  
Klondike
Race Director
 
Klondike's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: San Antonio Texas
Posts: 19,935
Received 110 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

I have a 96 LT4 with the Bilstein Z51 shocks that came with the Z51 package. Don't think there is a whole lot different about the suspension except for maybe sway bars and front brakes, maybe stiffer springs. They are fully mechanical shocks, no electronics involved. I don't see any reason you couldn't install them on your car.
Old 10-19-2017, 09:32 PM
  #3  
QCVette
Le Mans Master
 
QCVette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2009
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 6,337
Received 626 Likes on 488 Posts

Default

Short answer... Yes you can use them.

Longer answer...

I found some info on the Bilstein HD (non Z51) and SP (Z51) for comparison.

I searched for my '95 Corvette and found length and damping values by part number for these shocks.
**The only length difference between the HD or SP is the compressed length of the front shocks. The Z51 has more travel and can go slightly lower.
**The damping rates are quite different. The Z51 rates are about twice as firm in both jounce and rebound.

For me the choice is easy. I will go with the Z51 shocks on my '95. I liked them on my '94 and was investigating it to see the differences. I like a firmer ride.

HD (B6) Front (non Z51) 24-020534
Length Min/Max 10.18" / 13.56"
Damping Jounce/Rebound 106 Nm/ 76 Nm

SP (B8) Front (Z51) 24-184861
Length Min/Max 9.43" / 13.56"
Damping Jounce/Rebound 228 Nm/ 261 Nm



HD (B6) Rear (non Z51) 24-020541
Length Min/Max 9.61" / 14.69"
Damping Jounce/Rebound 134 Nm/ 114 Nm

SP (B8) Rear (Z51) 24-184878
Length Min/Max 9.61" / 14.69"
Damping Jounce/Rebound 222 Nm/ 222 Nm
The following 2 users liked this post by QCVette:
CA1992C4 (10-19-2017), The Snowman (10-20-2017)
Old 10-19-2017, 11:18 PM
  #4  
lilfish419
Heel & Toe
Thread Starter
 
lilfish419's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks a ton guys! I think I'll go with the B8's as I like a firmer suspension myself.
Old 10-20-2017, 08:48 AM
  #5  
TorchTarga94
Melting Slicks
 
TorchTarga94's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2011
Location: Trinity FL
Posts: 2,577
Received 191 Likes on 158 Posts

Default

Did the same on my 94' FE1 suspension back in 2012. Been very happy with them! Still compliant but firm up as soon as you want to get playful (giggity).

Get notified of new replies

To 1992 Base Bilstein vs Bilstein Z51




Quick Reply: 1992 Base Bilstein vs Bilstein Z51



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:41 AM.