1992 Base Bilstein vs Bilstein Z51
#1
Heel & Toe
Thread Starter
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1992 Base Bilstein vs Bilstein Z51
Can anyone tell me if I can use the Bilstein Z51 shocks on my 1992 w/o having a Z51 equipped package? Car does not have the optional ride selective option. Thanks
#2
Race Director
I have a 96 LT4 with the Bilstein Z51 shocks that came with the Z51 package. Don't think there is a whole lot different about the suspension except for maybe sway bars and front brakes, maybe stiffer springs. They are fully mechanical shocks, no electronics involved. I don't see any reason you couldn't install them on your car.
#3
Le Mans Master
Short answer... Yes you can use them.
Longer answer...
I found some info on the Bilstein HD (non Z51) and SP (Z51) for comparison.
I searched for my '95 Corvette and found length and damping values by part number for these shocks.
**The only length difference between the HD or SP is the compressed length of the front shocks. The Z51 has more travel and can go slightly lower.
**The damping rates are quite different. The Z51 rates are about twice as firm in both jounce and rebound.
For me the choice is easy. I will go with the Z51 shocks on my '95. I liked them on my '94 and was investigating it to see the differences. I like a firmer ride.
HD (B6) Front (non Z51) 24-020534
Length Min/Max 10.18" / 13.56"
Damping Jounce/Rebound 106 Nm/ 76 Nm
SP (B8) Front (Z51) 24-184861
Length Min/Max 9.43" / 13.56"
Damping Jounce/Rebound 228 Nm/ 261 Nm
HD (B6) Rear (non Z51) 24-020541
Length Min/Max 9.61" / 14.69"
Damping Jounce/Rebound 134 Nm/ 114 Nm
SP (B8) Rear (Z51) 24-184878
Length Min/Max 9.61" / 14.69"
Damping Jounce/Rebound 222 Nm/ 222 Nm
Longer answer...
I found some info on the Bilstein HD (non Z51) and SP (Z51) for comparison.
I searched for my '95 Corvette and found length and damping values by part number for these shocks.
**The only length difference between the HD or SP is the compressed length of the front shocks. The Z51 has more travel and can go slightly lower.
**The damping rates are quite different. The Z51 rates are about twice as firm in both jounce and rebound.
For me the choice is easy. I will go with the Z51 shocks on my '95. I liked them on my '94 and was investigating it to see the differences. I like a firmer ride.
HD (B6) Front (non Z51) 24-020534
Length Min/Max 10.18" / 13.56"
Damping Jounce/Rebound 106 Nm/ 76 Nm
SP (B8) Front (Z51) 24-184861
Length Min/Max 9.43" / 13.56"
Damping Jounce/Rebound 228 Nm/ 261 Nm
HD (B6) Rear (non Z51) 24-020541
Length Min/Max 9.61" / 14.69"
Damping Jounce/Rebound 134 Nm/ 114 Nm
SP (B8) Rear (Z51) 24-184878
Length Min/Max 9.61" / 14.69"
Damping Jounce/Rebound 222 Nm/ 222 Nm
The following 2 users liked this post by QCVette:
CA1992C4 (10-19-2017),
The Snowman (10-20-2017)
#5
Melting Slicks
Did the same on my 94' FE1 suspension back in 2012. Been very happy with them! Still compliant but firm up as soon as you want to get playful (giggity).