C5 Tech Corvette Tech/Performance: LS1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MPG Hit with 4.10?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2017, 05:30 PM
  #1  
ChrisLSx
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
ChrisLSx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2002
Location: Lawrenceburg, KY
Posts: 1,102
Received 112 Likes on 83 Posts

Default MPG Hit with 4.10?

What kind of MPG hit are people seeing with 4.10 gears in a manual C5?

I find that other than freeway, I never get going fast enough to use 6th gear so I'm considering 4.10s. BUT, I don't want to entirely trash my good fuel economy (I'm getting 30+MPG on the highway).
Old 10-19-2017, 07:09 PM
  #2  
dork
Drifting
 
dork's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,293
Received 225 Likes on 143 Posts

Default

Before I installed 4.10s I had a hand-calculated 27.4mpg for a cross-country trip from Biloxi, MS to Walnut Creek, CA. Cruise control was set as often as possible at the speedlimit +5mph. For the exact same run 4 months later in late September with 4.10s I got a hand-calculated 22.8. A real disappointment. Everyone claimed they saw "only" a 2-3mpg drop; some guys who I never believed claimed a negligible (and suspicious) "only 1-2mpg loss". They musta all been in AZ, OK, or KA, because the rolling hills of MS, LA, NM, west TX and CA sure must be the areas killing my mileage.

I've made that run at least 8x and for the last 3 runs I never got as much as 23.5. It seems that "enhanced memory" was the bait that hooked me into hoping for better. Do I care? not hardly. The 'extra' $$ penalty prolly amounts to less than $400 per year for 15,000 miles. That's prolly $4 or as much as a whole extra $5 per fill up--I fill up anywhere between 1/2 - 1/4 tank left depending on where I am (remote west TX, I'll fill up whenever I can). I never let the tank drop below 1/4. Financially, I don't feel it at all since it's "pay as you go" (yes, pun intended).

Oops... forgot--this is an 03 z06.

Last edited by dork; 10-19-2017 at 07:09 PM.
The following users liked this post:
ChrisLSx (10-19-2017)
Old 10-20-2017, 08:58 AM
  #3  
tbrowne
Pro
 
tbrowne's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Springfield Ohio
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
Received 100 Likes on 83 Posts

Default

How much mileage you lose depends on what rear ratio you have now. What are you currently running?
Old 10-20-2017, 09:09 AM
  #4  
ztheusa
Melting Slicks

 
ztheusa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Taildragers rule! USA1
Posts: 3,458
Received 341 Likes on 213 Posts

Default

I "could" do the math, but my slide rule is buried deep down in a box somewhere. But, I believe you could simulate 4.10 gear/6th with stock 3.42/5th.

5th stock on your M12 would be .84 X 3.42= 2.87
6th on a 4.10 would be .56 X 4.10= 2.29

Well, running in 5th on your stock setup will give worse mileage than 6th with 4.10. I think I'll go back to bed now!!!
Old 10-20-2017, 10:51 AM
  #5  
ChrisLSx
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
ChrisLSx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2002
Location: Lawrenceburg, KY
Posts: 1,102
Received 112 Likes on 83 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tbrowne
How much mileage you lose depends on what rear ratio you have now. What are you currently running?
Stock 3.46 gears
Old 10-20-2017, 10:54 AM
  #6  
dork
Drifting
 
dork's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,293
Received 225 Likes on 143 Posts

Default

If you go here: http://www.csgnetwork.com/multirpmcalc.html

and plug in your numbers at the bottom calculator, you can figure out the hypothetical loss.

For my 03 z06 I used these comparative numbers:

OEM Ring / Pinion : 3.42
Tire height : 26.1"
MPH : 79
Trans final gear: .56
RPM calculated: 1948

R/P : 4.10
TH : 26.1"
MPH: 79
TFG: .56
RPM: 2335

1948/2335 = .834

Multiply my OEM-diff-gear gas mileage of 27.4mpg x .834 and the calculator's estimate is remarkably right on the nose for what I get as an average--the calculator says 22.85--I prolly get ~22.8 for an average over 4 cross-country trips. I've done better and worse on different trips--as low as 22.2 and as high as 23.4, so I'd say the calculator is pretty accurate but you might do better in AZ if your currently getting 30+ because that indicates to me that you're mostly on "perfectly" flat ground.

Using your number "30", it looks like you'll come in around 25.3mpg cruising at an average of ~75-85mph. (That's the speed at what my fuel mileage is calculated. It also includes prolly 8-10 incidents of WOT from "Xmph" to X+25mph before I let off when passing.)

Last edited by dork; 10-20-2017 at 11:18 AM.
The following users liked this post:
ChrisLSx (10-20-2017)
Old 10-20-2017, 01:09 PM
  #7  
93Polo
Team Owner
 
93Polo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Guinness Its whats for B'fast JAWGA
Posts: 31,668
Received 368 Likes on 315 Posts
CI 3-4-5-9 Veteran

Default

I prefer 3.73 nice performance, more usable with heads and cam or more power. I lost roughly 3mpg on the hwy with heads and cam.
The following users liked this post:
ChrisLSx (10-20-2017)
Old 10-20-2017, 01:39 PM
  #8  
ChrisLSx
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
ChrisLSx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2002
Location: Lawrenceburg, KY
Posts: 1,102
Received 112 Likes on 83 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 93Polo
I prefer 3.73 nice performance, more usable with heads and cam or more power. I lost roughly 3mpg on the hwy with heads and cam.
I had 3.73s in my 01 Z28 w/ heads and cam, but always felt it didn't have enough gear. Later I did 4.56 gears and loved it (but big time mpg hit).
Old 10-20-2017, 01:53 PM
  #9  
dork
Drifting
 
dork's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,293
Received 225 Likes on 143 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 93Polo
I prefer 3.73 nice performance, more usable with heads and cam or more power. I lost roughly 3mpg on the hwy with heads and cam.
That's the goal I was originally pondering, but several things influenced my decision to go with 'just' 4.10s.

I wanted to increase the HP/torque to just this side of needing to beef up the driveline--I didn't wanna hafta pay for new parts and an R&R of the tranny and half shafts, nor braces for the trans nor diff. All the sources said that meant 450rwhp or less. That ruled out an SC, but still allowed for your route, H/C/I.

My problem is, I'm in Podunk, Mississippi. The closest "reputable" speed shop is ~200 miles away. I wanted to leave the car for "one session"--no 'come backs' for tweaking "minor adjustments" or 'errors', or anything. Maybe the only posters on the forums are the squeaky wheels--the guys who've had problems with their H/C/I installs--but I didn't wanna take the chance that some renowned shop and/or some tuner might make a small mistake and/or assemble an incorrect/incompatible combination of parts or a bad tune that would require me to drive all the way back for another adjustment session--godforbid I'd have to leave the car there.

So I opted for the "brainless" R&R--a gear swap. It would have no effect on the engine, BCM, tranny, half-shafts, etc., only seat-of-the-pants and gas mileage. Better yet, since I was needing a new clutch, the labor for the R&R was 'free'. It only cost the price of a new gearbox; financially, I think I made out better, not that that matters. I wish I could have trusted the shop to deliver a perfect result, but with my luck, I'd have needed a tweak session, and I just wasn't willing, or I'd have done H/C/I, too.

Last edited by dork; 10-20-2017 at 01:56 PM.
Old 10-20-2017, 03:40 PM
  #10  
93Polo
Team Owner
 
93Polo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Guinness Its whats for B'fast JAWGA
Posts: 31,668
Received 368 Likes on 315 Posts
CI 3-4-5-9 Veteran

Default

4.56s could be great on slicks at the track. It all depend on goals and what your aiming for.
Originally Posted by dork
That's the goal I was originally pondering, but several things influenced my decision to go with 'just' 4.10s.

I wanted to increase the HP/torque to just this side of needing to beef up the driveline--I didn't wanna hafta pay for new parts and an R&R of the tranny and half shafts, nor braces for the trans nor diff. All the sources said that meant 450rwhp or less. That ruled out an SC, but still allowed for your route, H/C/I.

My problem is, I'm in Podunk, Mississippi. The closest "reputable" speed shop is ~200 miles away. I wanted to leave the car for "one session"--no 'come backs' for tweaking "minor adjustments" or 'errors', or anything. Maybe the only posters on the forums are the squeaky wheels--the guys who've had problems with their H/C/I installs--but I didn't wanna take the chance that some renowned shop and/or some tuner might make a small mistake and/or assemble an incorrect/incompatible combination of parts or a bad tune that would require me to drive all the way back for another adjustment session--godforbid I'd have to leave the car there.

So I opted for the "brainless" R&R--a gear swap. It would have no effect on the engine, BCM, tranny, half-shafts, etc., only seat-of-the-pants and gas mileage. Better yet, since I was needing a new clutch, the labor for the R&R was 'free'. It only cost the price of a new gearbox; financially, I think I made out better, not that that matters. I wish I could have trusted the shop to deliver a perfect result, but with my luck, I'd have needed a tweak session, and I just wasn't willing, or I'd have done H/C/I, too.
I have friends locally who are very happy doing mail order tunes from Frost tuning.

Get notified of new replies

To MPG Hit with 4.10?




Quick Reply: MPG Hit with 4.10?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:24 AM.