C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

[C2] Why was Positraction not an option on Automatic cars???

Old 04-17-2018, 09:59 AM
  #1  
65silververt
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
65silververt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Homewood Alabama
Posts: 4,171
Received 331 Likes on 203 Posts
Default Why was Positraction not an option on Automatic cars???

I'm working on a 66 Coupe with a 327/300hp engine and an automatic.

Someone swapped the original rear end out for a 1967 dated 3.70 Posi-traction unit.
From what I have read in my books, the car should have had a non-positraction 3.36 ratio rear end.

So, my question is, why was positraction not an option on automatic cars in 1966?

Thanks
Old 04-17-2018, 10:38 AM
  #2  
kenba
Safety Car

Support Corvetteforum!
 
kenba's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: PHOENIX AZ. WHAT A MAN WON"T SPEND TO GIVE HIS ASS A RIDE
Posts: 3,677
Received 306 Likes on 220 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 65silververt
I'm working on a 66 Coupe with a 327/300hp engine and an automatic.

Someone swapped the original rear end out for a 1967 dated 3.70 Posi-traction unit.
From what I have read in my books, the car should have had a non-positraction 3.36 ratio rear end.

So, my question is, why was positraction not an option on automatic cars in 1966?

Thanks
I believe you could get a posi. with any transmission.
Old 04-17-2018, 10:44 AM
  #3  
SWCDuke
Race Director
 
SWCDuke's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2000
Location: Redondo Beach USA
Posts: 12,487
Received 1,973 Likes on 1,188 Posts

Default

Please state what "books" you are reading to warn others of this misinformation.

Positraction (RPO G-81) was an unrestricted option with all engine/ transmission/standard axle ratio combinations, and all but one optional axle ratio were ONLY available with Positraction.

The one exception was 250/300 HP engines with either four-speed or Powerglide transmissions from '63-'65. The standard axle was 3.36, open, for all transmissions and Positraction was optional. You could also order a 3.08, either open (RPO G-91, about two bucks) or Positraction, but only with a four-speed or Powerglide, not the base three-speed manual.

Fewer than 4500 were sold over the those three model years, which is probably why it disappeared after '65, and I suspect some were ordered erroneously because it's real easy to mix up G81 and G91.

I think the reason this option even existed back in the day is that some "safety experts" thought Positraction was "dangerous" because on a slippery surface like snow or ice when both rear tires broke loose the rear could go sideways. True, but if you know what you're doing a Positraction axle will get you out of a slippery situation while the open diff axle will just spin one rear tire in vane and be hopelessly stuck.

Duke

Last edited by SWCDuke; 04-17-2018 at 11:37 AM.
The following users liked this post:
65silververt (04-17-2018)
Old 04-17-2018, 10:54 AM
  #4  
AZDoug
Race Director
 
AZDoug's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Camp Verde AZ
Posts: 12,434
Received 1,478 Likes on 905 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
2017 C1 of Year Finalist

Default

I think the only axle ratio you COULDN'T get posi on was the 3.55 in the C1 cars.

Doug
Old 04-17-2018, 11:09 AM
  #5  
DZAUTO
Race Director

 
DZAUTO's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Mustang OK
Posts: 13,842
Received 3,766 Likes on 1,669 Posts
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2015 C1 of the Year Finalist

Default

If you bring your car to my house (or just bring the rearend), you can have posi with ANYTHING!
Old 04-17-2018, 11:39 AM
  #6  
emccomas
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
emccomas's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Madison - just west of Huntsville AL
Posts: 31,361
Received 1,283 Likes on 732 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AZDoug
I think the only axle ratio you COULDN'T get posi on was the 3.55 in the C1 cars.

Doug
That doesn't sound right. I have a 1957 passenger car rear chunk with a 3.55 posi in it.
Old 04-17-2018, 11:49 AM
  #7  
AZDoug
Race Director
 
AZDoug's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Camp Verde AZ
Posts: 12,434
Received 1,478 Likes on 905 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
2017 C1 of Year Finalist

Default

Originally Posted by jv04
That doesn't sound right. I have a 1957 passenger car rear chunk with a 3.55 posi in it.
The carrier the 3.55 gear set came in (at least 1959 and later) won't accept a posi case unless you grind some of an internal support web away. I would suggest you have a carrier originally for a different ratio and someone put 3.55 gears in, if that is what you in fact, have. Or someone removed part of the web, like I did, so as to fit a posi case.

The 3.55 was only available with a PG, and non-posi in later C1s. i cannot say for sure about earlier ones.

Doug

Last edited by AZDoug; 04-17-2018 at 11:50 AM.
Old 04-17-2018, 12:24 PM
  #8  
65silververt
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
65silververt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Homewood Alabama
Posts: 4,171
Received 331 Likes on 203 Posts
Default

Thanks for clearing that up! I appreciate the replies!
Old 04-17-2018, 02:02 PM
  #9  
62corvette
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
62corvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Waterford WI
Posts: 4,963
Received 663 Likes on 472 Posts

Default

AZDoug,
You are usually right on. However, 62’s had 3.55 with posi. CC was the code with standard brakes, CL with metallic brakes. That wasn’t just on paper-I have an original CC here in the car.
Don’t know how to make that fit with what you said regarding the inner web—this is the original 3789812 case.
Old 04-17-2018, 02:08 PM
  #10  
midyear
Drifting
 
midyear's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2002
Location: Hogansville ga
Posts: 1,395
Received 235 Likes on 141 Posts
2021 C2 of the Year Finalist - Modified

Default

if, for originality's sake, you need a 3.36 non posi, I have one dated 66 or 67 in my assorted rear ends, free if you want to pick it up.

dennis
The following 2 users liked this post by midyear:
65silververt (04-17-2018), William Buckley (04-18-2018)
Old 04-17-2018, 02:54 PM
  #11  
65vette396
Pro
 
65vette396's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Ozark, Missouri
Posts: 679
Received 155 Likes on 119 Posts

Default

My 67 has a 3:36 non-posi with base 300 hp and ac. Posi was an option but I guess most people ordering didn't think an auto needed posi as the performance wasn't there. Other than leaving 2 black marks on the pavement, a posi was only good if you got stuck and needed both wheels pulling to get you out of the mud.
Old 04-17-2018, 04:48 PM
  #12  
AZDoug
Race Director
 
AZDoug's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Camp Verde AZ
Posts: 12,434
Received 1,478 Likes on 905 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
2017 C1 of Year Finalist

Default

Originally Posted by 62corvette
AZDoug,
You are usually right on. However, 62’s had 3.55 with posi. CC was the code with standard brakes, CL with metallic brakes. That wasn’t just on paper-I have an original CC here in the car.
Don’t know how to make that fit with what you said regarding the inner web—this is the original 3789812 case.
Must have been a '62 only option, probably to account for the larger motor.
The web thing is covered here:

http://www.dallasclassicchevy.com/im...0TO%20POSI.pdf

Doug

Last edited by AZDoug; 04-17-2018 at 04:52 PM.
Old 04-18-2018, 11:10 AM
  #13  
emccomas
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
emccomas's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Madison - just west of Huntsville AL
Posts: 31,361
Received 1,283 Likes on 732 Posts

Default

As best I can tell, 3.55 posi was available in passenger cars but not Corvettes until 1962.

Always learning something on this forum.
Old 04-18-2018, 12:38 PM
  #14  
62corvette
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
62corvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Waterford WI
Posts: 4,963
Received 663 Likes on 472 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AZDoug
Must have been a '62 only option, probably to account for the larger motor.
The web thing is covered here:

http://www.dallasclassicchevy.com/im...0TO%20POSI.pdf

Doug
Doug,
I read that all the way through. I knew about that web—but there was nothing about 3.55 posi at all. Only about changing from non-posi case to house a retrofit posi. Nothing germane to 3.55 ring needing that web cut down. What did I miss?
Old 04-18-2018, 03:58 PM
  #15  
AZDoug
Race Director
 
AZDoug's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Camp Verde AZ
Posts: 12,434
Received 1,478 Likes on 905 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
2017 C1 of Year Finalist

Default

Originally Posted by 62corvette
Doug,
I read that all the way through. I knew about that web—but there was nothing about 3.55 posi at all. Only about changing from non-posi case to house a retrofit posi. Nothing germane to 3.55 ring needing that web cut down. What did I miss?
Up until 1962, all 3.55 were open diff, you had to cut the web if you wanted to use install a posi case inside the open diff carrier the 3.55 gear set came in (from the factory). It seem pretty clear from my other posts, except for the 1962 thing.

Doug
Old 04-18-2018, 06:14 PM
  #16  
emccomas
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
emccomas's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Madison - just west of Huntsville AL
Posts: 31,361
Received 1,283 Likes on 732 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AZDoug
Up until 1962, all 3.55 were open diff, you had to cut the web if you wanted to use install a posi case inside the open diff carrier the 3.55 gear set came in (from the factory). It seem pretty clear from my other posts, except for the 1962 thing.

Doug
Can you tell us what rear end code AK or BK for 1957 to 1961 represents?
Old 04-18-2018, 07:25 PM
  #17  
65vette396
Pro
 
65vette396's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Ozark, Missouri
Posts: 679
Received 155 Likes on 119 Posts

Default

My books don't show the AK code being used until the 65 MY for 3:36 non-posi with manual or PG trans.. The AK continued until MY 69. I didn't see a BK referenced in the NCRS Specification Guide of numbers.

Get notified of new replies

To Why was Positraction not an option on Automatic cars???

Old 04-18-2018, 07:33 PM
  #18  
William Buckley
Racer
 
William Buckley's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2016
Location: Hoover AL
Posts: 459
Received 114 Likes on 48 Posts
2017 C2 of Year Finalist
2016 C2 of Year Finalist
Default

Originally Posted by 65silververt
I'm working on a 66 Coupe with a 327/300hp engine and an automatic.

Someone swapped the original rear end out for a 1967 dated 3.70 Posi-traction unit.
From what I have read in my books, the car should have had a non-positraction 3.36 ratio rear end.

So, my question is, why was positraction not an option on automatic cars in 1966?

Thanks
Chris,
The owner's manual in the glove compartment states that positraction is available with the automatic transmission.
Old 04-19-2018, 05:59 AM
  #19  
emccomas
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
emccomas's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Madison - just west of Huntsville AL
Posts: 31,361
Received 1,283 Likes on 732 Posts

Default

The AK and BK codes are listed in Chevrolet by the Numbers for passenger cars from 1957 to 1961 as 3.55 posi.

Last edited by emccomas; 04-19-2018 at 06:01 AM.
Old 05-06-2018, 06:51 PM
  #20  
CorvetteMikeB
Melting Slicks
 
CorvetteMikeB's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2017
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,582
Received 439 Likes on 311 Posts
2023 Restomod of the Year finalist
Default

Originally Posted by AZDoug
Up until 1962, all 3.55 were open diff, you had to cut the web if you wanted to use install a posi case inside the open diff carrier the 3.55 gear set came in (from the factory). It seem pretty clear from my other posts, except for the 1962 thing.

Doug

I am getting my 3.36 rear differential re-built. Is there any reason to make it a positive traction? Or just have it rebuilt w/o positive traction....

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: [C2] Why was Positraction not an option on Automatic cars???



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 AM.