How ugly is this lol
#6
Race Director
Member Since: May 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 13,995
Received 2,705 Likes
on
1,667 Posts
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16'-'17-‘18-'19-'20-'21-'22-
'23-'24
Very ugly
#7
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: small town in S.E Pa. PA
Posts: 21,325
Received 3,812 Likes
on
1,925 Posts
St. Jude Donor '03-'04
Sometimes a functional modification is just that ( functional ) to those who do not see the value in function, it might be perceived as less than an aesthetic modification.
Bill aka ET
Bill aka ET
#8
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: small town in S.E Pa. PA
Posts: 21,325
Received 3,812 Likes
on
1,925 Posts
St. Jude Donor '03-'04
#10
Melting Slicks
Yes, it could be someone's track car. I had my 72" wing break during a practice session in the morning had to go out and try to qualify without one it was terrifying, rear was very loose in high speed turns and braking. Some people need them depending on use of the car. If it's just a wing slapped on for no reason and no balancing aero up front it could look out of place.
Last edited by z06801; 02-14-2019 at 05:56 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by z06801:
El original (02-14-2019),
FYRARMS (02-16-2019)
#11
Drifting
Ehh if the owner enjoys it then more power to them. Spoilers in any shape or form mounted on a car generate aero grip (different from mechanical grip) which at the least gives it legitimacy as a mod. Chrome tail light bezels, exhaust plate enhancers, and brake caliper dress up kits can't say the same thing...
The following users liked this post:
FYRARMS (02-16-2019)
#12
Race Director
Member Since: May 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 13,995
Received 2,705 Likes
on
1,667 Posts
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16'-'17-‘18-'19-'20-'21-'22-
'23-'24
Lots of downforce here!
#14
Safety Car
The wing in the opening post, I'm not sure. It looks more draggy than down force. The mounts look too weak and too close to the center of the car to be effective for high downforce. I can't tell from the angle of the picture what the cross section of the wing really looks like, nor can I tell the angle of attack of that setup. Both are important for downforce.
@z06801 looks like he has a very functional wing on his. The supports look more substantial, and they look like they are closer to the edges of the deck lid/hatch, where the bodywork is stronger and more weight can be placed to transfer downard to the rest of the body and ultimately to the wheels.
IIRC, downforce (and drag) increase with the square of speed, and there's usually a target maximum speed for maximum down force for most serious wings.
The following users liked this post:
calvins (02-15-2019)
#18
Administrator
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: In a parallel universe. Currently own 2014 Stingray Coupe.
Posts: 342,705
Received 19,227 Likes
on
13,933 Posts
C7 of the Year - Modified Finalist 2021
MO Events Coordinator
St. Jude Co-Organizer
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-
'20-'21-'22-'23-'24
NCM Sinkhole Donor
CI 5, 8 & 11 Veteran
The following users liked this post:
calvins (02-15-2019)
#20
Melting Slicks
[quote=C6_Racer_X]It depends as much on the design of the wing as it does on speed.
The wing in the opening post, I'm not sure. It looks more draggy than down force. The mounts look too weak and too close to the center of the car to be effective for high downforce. I can't tell from the angle of the picture what the cross section of the wing really looks like, nor can I tell the angle of attack of that setup. Both are important for downforce.
@z06801 looks like he has a very functional wing on his. The supports look more substantial, and they look like they are closer to the edges of the deck lid/hatch, where the bodywork is stronger and more weight can be placed to transfer downard to the rest of the body and ultimately to the wheels.
Mine is actually mounted to the frame, the uprights go though slits in the trunk lid down to the frame.
The wing in the opening post, I'm not sure. It looks more draggy than down force. The mounts look too weak and too close to the center of the car to be effective for high downforce. I can't tell from the angle of the picture what the cross section of the wing really looks like, nor can I tell the angle of attack of that setup. Both are important for downforce.
@z06801 looks like he has a very functional wing on his. The supports look more substantial, and they look like they are closer to the edges of the deck lid/hatch, where the bodywork is stronger and more weight can be placed to transfer downard to the rest of the body and ultimately to the wheels.
Mine is actually mounted to the frame, the uprights go though slits in the trunk lid down to the frame.
Last edited by z06801; 02-14-2019 at 10:00 PM.