C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

Breakerless SE vs Pertronix

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2019, 02:21 PM
  #1  
emccomas
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
emccomas's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Madison - just west of Huntsville AL
Posts: 31,361
Received 1,283 Likes on 732 Posts

Default Breakerless SE vs Pertronix

OK, I have to decide which way to go.

My 64 no longer has a ballast resistor. Does the Breakerless SE system work without a ballast resistor? I know the Pertronix does.

I know the Breakerless SE does not require a special coil, I am not sure about the Pertronix?

I do not want to retro-fit a ballast resistor to the 64 at this point.
Old 05-14-2019, 02:27 PM
  #2  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

Originally Posted by emccomas
OK, I have to decide which way to go.

My 64 no longer has a ballast resistor. Does the Breakerless SE system work without a ballast resistor? I know the Pertronix does.
No. It is designed to plug into a completely stock environment with OEM coil, ballast resistor, plugs and plug wires.

I know the Breakerless SE does not require a special coil, I am not sure about the Pertronix?
You'll need a coil appropriate for use without the ballast resistor in the case of the Pertronix III
The Pertronix Flamethrower series offers several selections. Years ago the coils were bad with a high failure rate - the later versions seem to be fine.

I do not want to retro-fit a ballast resistor to the 64 at this point.
Then you've made your choice -- Pertronix.

Last edited by Frankie the Fink; 05-14-2019 at 02:30 PM.
The following users liked this post:
vetintheblood (05-14-2019)
Old 05-14-2019, 03:32 PM
  #3  
Dreaming60’s
Drifting
 
Dreaming60’s's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2018
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,606
Received 419 Likes on 246 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (appearance mods) 2019
Default

FMI= for my information. So, is there a problem having a ballast resistor? How do you eliminate a ballast resistor on a "points" car? I've never understood the purpose of a ballast resistor, but if the guy on the internet is correct, a ballast resistor reduces the voltage going to the coil, from 12v to 8-9v so it doesn't overheat. It must do more?

BH
Old 05-14-2019, 03:52 PM
  #4  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

Its a lot more than reducing voltage and some can wax eloquent for many paragraphs about its function but it IS necessary on a points car with a standard coil...

I won't get into it all here again....you can search the internet as easily as I; in this context its a critical path item to the OP's decision, no ballast resistor - then no Breakerless SE; its Pertronix -- and the later versions at that.
Old 05-14-2019, 04:00 PM
  #5  
Dreaming60’s
Drifting
 
Dreaming60’s's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2018
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,606
Received 419 Likes on 246 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (appearance mods) 2019
Default

You're right, I can do that. it sounded over-simplified to me, so I asked.

Is one system really superior to the other? Will one system make my car run faster, better or ??? than the other? Installation of the breakerless SE system seems to be very, very simple and even a novice can handle it. Pertronix looks a little harder, but not much.

BH
Old 05-14-2019, 04:13 PM
  #6  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

A ton of stuff on both products in older forum threads....none of them will do any better than a new set of points/condensor; the chief benefit is not having to do regular maintenance on the newer devices which, as little as classics are driven is nearly a moot point.


Pertronix got a bad name early on for mysterious failures with no apparent cause - the first version had few electrical protections from spikes, reversed polarity and you-name-it....then came an onslaught of owners that did bad installs and caused their own failures. The result being the device got a undeserved bad rap (IMO). The latest versions are very robust but still require modifications from an original ignition setup.

On the other hand, the Breakerless SE (which I now recommend without reservation) requires only a spinal cord and no frontal lobes to install. NOTHING in the original ignition configuration changes except for the replacement of the points - nearly foolproof... It is what I run...

Neither device will regrow hair, increase your performance in the bedroom, eliminate belly fat or reduce unsightly wrinkles...

Last edited by Frankie the Fink; 05-14-2019 at 04:50 PM.
The following 3 users liked this post by Frankie the Fink:
C.T. (05-14-2019), C2Scho (05-28-2019), Dreaming60’s (05-14-2019)
Old 05-14-2019, 04:26 PM
  #7  
dplotkin
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
dplotkin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,532
Received 2,130 Likes on 1,030 Posts
2023 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2019 C2 of Year Finalist (stock)
2015 C2 of the Year Finalist

Default

Originally Posted by 62cruiseer
FMI= for my information. So, is there a problem having a ballast resistor? How do you eliminate a ballast resistor on a "points" car? I've never understood the purpose of a ballast resistor, but if the guy on the internet is correct, a ballast resistor reduces the voltage going to the coil, from 12v to 8-9v so it doesn't overheat. It must do more?
BH
Given the sum and substance of the voluminous posts on the subject to which Mr. Fink refers, evidently neither do many of us. The term "ballast" when used in the electric field as opposed to the nautical always means to limit current flow, and is commonly done with a simple resistor in the case of automobiles but also with inductors, as in the case of a florescent lamp ballast. The concept is the same, current needs to be limited to the optimum value to prolong the life of the appurtenant devices and units attached thereto. (point set & coil).

Or some other bullshit along those lines.

Mr. Fink's take is about the best advice you can expect to receive.

Good luck.

Dan

Last edited by dplotkin; 05-14-2019 at 04:32 PM.
The following users liked this post:
jim lockwood (05-14-2019)
Old 05-14-2019, 04:42 PM
  #8  
65GGvert
Team Owner
 
65GGvert's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Kannapolis NC
Posts: 20,579
Received 3,220 Likes on 2,302 Posts

Default

This is not to tell you what you should do, but to tell you what I would do. If the rest of the system is stock, I'd install a ballast resistor and a breakerless SE with everything else remaining stock. My second choice would be exactly the same except use stock points and condensor. My last choice would be to install a Pertronix and special coils and anything else. The SE system cannot be detected from stock without lifting the distributor cap. I have one car running SE and one using points and condensor and both are fine. With the SE you can also carry a set of points and condensor and swap it back over for emergency or troubleshooting. I've never had to do that with either SE or points, but it's an option.
The following 2 users liked this post by 65GGvert:
65silververt (05-23-2019), C2Scho (05-28-2019)
Old 05-14-2019, 04:51 PM
  #9  
BLUE1972
Race Director
 
BLUE1972's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: FARMINGDALE N..Y.
Posts: 15,949
Received 1,127 Likes on 733 Posts

Default

Read the instructions. If the unit says 12 volts then jump the Resistor ( move one wire from the top to the bottom terminal on the resistor) .

If the instructions say ( less than ) >12volts ( like 9.6) then just put the points eliminator in and keep the resistor as the factory has it.

Last one I installed 3 years ago said 12 volts. So I jumped / by-passed the resistor. He runs it with no issue.
Old 05-14-2019, 06:01 PM
  #10  
65GGvert
Team Owner
 
65GGvert's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Kannapolis NC
Posts: 20,579
Received 3,220 Likes on 2,302 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BLUE1972
Read the instructions. If the unit says 12 volts then jump the Resistor ( move one wire from the top to the bottom terminal on the resistor) .

If the instructions say ( less than ) >12volts ( like 9.6) then just put the points eliminator in and keep the resistor as the factory has it.

Last one I installed 3 years ago said 12 volts. So I jumped / by-passed the resistor. He runs it with no issue.
He doesn't have a resistor now
Old 05-14-2019, 08:39 PM
  #11  
69427
Tech Contributor
 
69427's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Posts: 18,355
Received 768 Likes on 550 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dplotkin
Given the sum and substance of the voluminous posts on the subject to which Mr. Fink refers, evidently neither do many of us. The term "ballast" when used in the electric field as opposed to the nautical always means to limit current flow, and is commonly done with a simple resistor in the case of automobiles but also with inductors, as in the case of a florescent lamp ballast. The concept is the same, current needs to be limited to the optimum value to prolong the life of the appurtenant devices and units attached thereto. (point set & coil).

Or some other bullshit along those lines.

Mr. Fink's take is about the best advice you can expect to receive.

Good luck.

Dan
You are correct, friend. The ballast resistor on our cars is there to limit the primary current in the system to prevent the coil from turning into a toaster oven.

(The old wives' tale about the ballast acting like a voltage regulator won't seem to die. The coil constantly sees varying voltages from 6 to 12 to 200 volts across the primary windings every ignition event.

There's an ignition sticky in C3 Tech that explains all this.)
The following users liked this post:
jim lockwood (05-14-2019)
Old 05-14-2019, 09:51 PM
  #12  
Dreaming60’s
Drifting
 
Dreaming60’s's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2018
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,606
Received 419 Likes on 246 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (appearance mods) 2019
Default

Excellent advice from everyone and I appreciate it. I'm just trying to get away from the dual points of the 340 HP and the SE sounds like the path to follow.

On the other hand, the Breakerless SE (which I now recommend without reservation) requires only a spinal cord and no frontal lobes to install.
Love the verbiage. I'm putting that away for future use

Butch
Old 05-14-2019, 10:38 PM
  #13  
BLUE1972
Race Director
 
BLUE1972's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: FARMINGDALE N..Y.
Posts: 15,949
Received 1,127 Likes on 733 Posts

Default

One of the main uses of the ballast resistor was to stop the coil from overheating when the key was left on without the motor running. The electronic inserts will not do that, they will not keep feeding the coil.

I prefer the unit with the rev limiter. I have helped friends install at least 10 and have not seen a failure over the last 8 years.

I have 4k miles on mine with no issues.

Last edited by BLUE1972; 05-14-2019 at 10:39 PM.
Old 05-15-2019, 05:38 AM
  #14  
emccomas
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
emccomas's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Madison - just west of Huntsville AL
Posts: 31,361
Received 1,283 Likes on 732 Posts

Default

OK, the Breakerless SE needs a ballast resistor. Got that part.

Points and condensor also need a ballast resistor.

It turns out that my car DOES have a ballast resistor, along with a Pertronix module and coil.

So, I am thinking Breakerless SE for the 64 Vette. I will use the Pertronix system on my 56 BelAir.



Last edited by emccomas; 05-15-2019 at 05:54 AM.
Old 05-15-2019, 05:51 AM
  #15  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

The Pertronix II can be used with or without a ballast resistor depending on the coil selected;



A Pertronix III requires a full 12V (No ballast resistor); all this is covered on their web site....the only advantage the III has over the Breakerless ia a built-in rev limiter... As, I said, if you are replacing the ballast resistor go with the Breakerless SE

Last edited by Frankie the Fink; 05-15-2019 at 06:07 AM.
Old 05-15-2019, 11:24 AM
  #16  
smuggler85
Instructor
 
smuggler85's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: Alpena MI
Posts: 141
Received 56 Likes on 38 Posts

Default

The Breakerless SE module is designed to work with your stock coil and ballast resister. Remove points, install module and you're good to go. The one wire SE setup looks completely stock until you remove the distributor cap.
The following 2 users liked this post by smuggler85:
98 SNAKE EATER (06-01-2021), tuxnharley (05-16-2019)
Old 05-15-2019, 11:49 AM
  #17  
Dreaming60’s
Drifting
 
Dreaming60’s's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2018
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,606
Received 419 Likes on 246 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (appearance mods) 2019
Default

Sounds like an excellent way to eliminate point float too.

BH

Get notified of new replies

To Breakerless SE vs Pertronix

Old 05-16-2019, 12:06 AM
  #18  
emccomas
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
emccomas's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Madison - just west of Huntsville AL
Posts: 31,361
Received 1,283 Likes on 732 Posts

Default

Breakerles SE it is. Thanks guys, and a special thanks to Frankie the the great wiring diagrams.

My 64 currently has a Pertronix III setup in it, wired like this. I am going to use this system on my 56 BelAir, and put a Breakerless SE in the 64 Vette.






Last edited by emccomas; 05-16-2019 at 12:08 AM.
Old 05-16-2019, 02:19 AM
  #19  
tbarb
Safety Car
 
tbarb's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2014
Posts: 3,536
Received 562 Likes on 479 Posts
Default

Ed,

Did you have any problems setting initial timing with a timing light using the Petronics. I had an experience with one and the timing kept jumping all around trying to set the initial timing. I don't know if the car had other ground problems but I never figured it out.
Old 05-16-2019, 07:00 AM
  #20  
emccomas
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
emccomas's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Madison - just west of Huntsville AL
Posts: 31,361
Received 1,283 Likes on 732 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tbarb
Ed,

Did you have any problems setting initial timing with a timing light using the Petronics. I had an experience with one and the timing kept jumping all around trying to set the initial timing. I don't know if the car had other ground problems but I never figured it out.
I never tried. The car ran great when I bought it, so I have never had a reason to put a timing light on it.


Quick Reply: Breakerless SE vs Pertronix



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:46 PM.