When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I can't believe GM didn't make an easier way to charge the battery on the Zr1 like a normal C8 stingray. what are these engineers thinking ? Spending almost 300K on a car that you have to remove panels to connect to a battery while it's easier on other models is not acceptable.
You would think it would be simple to add an easy hookup for charging. They do want to sell you the battery tender.....
for the amount of money they want, it better be easy to get it done. You have a connection to plug into the passenger side but it won't charge the battery so what is the point of having it ? We can't go backwards in technology since the C8 stingray have it!
The zr1 is not a daily driver and it's pain in the butt to keep removing the panels to get it charged on weekly basis.
From: Supporting the Corvette Community at Abel Chevrolet in Rio Vista, CA 707-374-6317 Ext.123
St. Jude Donor '08
Originally Posted by C821
for the amount of money they want, it better be easy to get it done. You have a connection to plug into the passenger side but it won't charge the battery so what is the point of having it ? We can't go backwards in technology since the C8 stingray have it!
The zr1 is not a daily driver and it's pain in the butt to keep removing the panels to get it charged on weekly basis.
Most trickle charger have leads that you can attach to the battery, put all the covers back on, and have the cord hanging into the Frunk for easy access.
Just run the quick connect to the terminals. Complaining about something that is really not a bug deal. First world problems
I don't understand these people that says we are just complaining. Man this is a 300K car and we should not have to remove panels to just plug in the car period when a 50k C8 is a straight forward connection, so yes GM wants to get lazy with engineering and save money and produce as many cars as they can and we have to pay arm and leg for a car deal with the issues later on ??? what's wrong with you people ??? also this is not the only issue man, I have a brand new car with with a less than 100 miles needs a valve body on a car that is out of stock, many panel alignment is very poor with big gap and all crooked, door side garnish has a play and body shop could not fix the issue the same with the door misalignment, so I'm not sure if you spent a 300K on a car before ort not but GM needs to get their shi** together and start providing a good quality control especially for their top $$$ cars!!
Just because it is a $300k car does not mean it should "walk on water". I have had a bad year with cars and I am not complaining--just dealing with reality. I just had a $240k MB AMG bought back from Mercedes Benz (after 8 months of ownership 2 of which were in the shop) and a few weeks ago my '26 ZR1 blew the motor apart with a big hole in the block. You think things are bad--deal with it! Life is short. Enjoy the ride my man! Just because these are expensive cars does not mean there are not issues.
Would you rather have a blown motor on a ZR1 or simply spend a little time trying to figure out how to hook up a battery tender?
On a positive note--GM built an amazing car as the ZR1--what a car, what a car, what a car! Simply amazing on the track! Unfortunately Michelin Road Atlanta race track killed the ZR1 motor at just over 1900 miles. But man the day before the engine blew apart--WHAT FRICKIN awesome car. I own 3 C8 Z06s and a C8 ZR1. The ZR1 is AWESOME on the track. Can't wait to get the new motor installed (hopefully this week) to get the ZR1 back to the track!!!!
Originally Posted by C821
I don't understand these people that says we are just complaining. Man this is a 300K car and we should not have to remove panels to just plug in the car period when a 50k C8 is a straight forward connection, so yes GM wants to get lazy with engineering and save money and produce as many cars as they can and we have to pay arm and leg for a car deal with the issues later on ??? what's wrong with you people ??? also this is not the only issue man, I have a brand new car with with a less than 100 miles needs a valve body on a car that is out of stock, many panel alignment is very poor with big gap and all crooked, door side garnish has a play and body shop could not fix the issue the same with the door misalignment, so I'm not sure if you spent a 300K on a car before ort not but GM needs to get their shi** together and start providing a good quality control especially for their top $$$ cars!!
Connect it to the battery and leave the wires hanging out. You dont have to keep removing the panels..
I miss the older cars from the 80s and 90s. So easy to get to stuff, and to change simple **** like front headlights or a battery. Now you have to pull parts off to get to the part you actually have to replace. Hell, I had to replace my battery in my jeep and the damn thing is under neath the passenger seat. Kind of a pain in the *** to get to and pull out and replace. Took me like 20mins but I got it done. When I had my 87 GN, battery is right where you can pull It out and put it right back in. That took a few minutes.. Those were the days for sure..
I don't understand these people that says we are just complaining. Man this is a 300K car and we should not have to remove panels to just plug in the car period when a 50k C8 is a straight forward connection, so yes GM wants to get lazy with engineering and save money and produce as many cars as they can and we have to pay arm and leg for a car deal with the issues later on ??? what's wrong with you people ??? also this is not the only issue man, I have a brand new car with with a less than 100 miles needs a valve body on a car that is out of stock, many panel alignment is very poor with big gap and all crooked, door side garnish has a play and body shop could not fix the issue the same with the door misalignment, so I'm not sure if you spent a 300K on a car before ort not but GM needs to get their shi** together and start providing a good quality control especially for their top $$$ cars!!
That's peanuts for what youre getting in terms of performance.
Unless you can point to another car thats even double the price that can touch this one in acceleration or handling?
That's peanuts for what youre getting in terms of performance.
Unless you can point to another car thats even double the price that can touch this one in acceleration or handling?
Come on man. Be happy.
a Tesla plaid for 80k I have is a faster car so performance alone isn’t justified and you guys need to stop rewarding bad behavior, hold GM accountable for mistakes they make so we all can have a better cars in the future, my brand new ZR1 sitting collecting dust now waiting for value body the needs a replacement after 100 miles driving the car so tell me about another car that have a similar performance on that regard.
Do you track your Tesla Plaid? How are you defining performance?
Originally Posted by C821
a Tesla plaid for 80k I have is a faster car so performance alone isn’t justified and you guys need to stop rewarding bad behavior, hold GM accountable for mistakes they make so we all can have a better cars in the future, my brand new ZR1 sitting collecting dust now waiting for value body the needs a replacement after 100 miles driving the car so tell me about another car that have a similar performance on that regard.
[QUOTE=C821;1609655723]a Tesla plaid for 80k I have is a faster car so performance alone isn’t justified and you guys need to stop rewarding bad behavior, hold GM accountable for mistakes they make so we all can have a better cars in the future, my brand new ZR1 sitting collecting dust now waiting for value body the needs a replacement after 100 miles driving the car so tell me about another car that have a similar performance on that regard.[/QUOTE. God buddy let it go!!!!!
I don't understand these people that says we are just complaining. Man this is a 300K car and we should not have to remove panels to just plug in the car period when a 50k C8 is a straight forward connection, so yes GM wants to get lazy with engineering and save money and produce as many cars as they can and we have to pay arm and leg for a car deal with the issues later on ??? what's wrong with you people ??? also this is not the only issue man, I have a brand new car with with a less than 100 miles needs a valve body on a car that is out of stock, many panel alignment is very poor with big gap and all crooked, door side garnish has a play and body shop could not fix the issue the same with the door misalignment, so I'm not sure if you spent a 300K on a car before ort not but GM needs to get their shi** together and start providing a good quality control especially for their top $$$ cars!!
\
imagine what happens when someone pays $100,000 over for a ZR1X costing in excess of $400,000 (with tax).? Porsche, Ferrari, Lamborghini stand out as examples of plug and play.
a Tesla plaid for 80k I have is a faster car so performance alone isn’t justified and you guys need to stop rewarding bad behavior, hold GM accountable for mistakes they make so we all can have a better cars in the future, my brand new ZR1 sitting collecting dust now waiting for value body the needs a replacement after 100 miles driving the car so tell me about another car that have a similar performance on that regard.[/QUOTE. God buddy let it go!!!!!
lol let go ??? How about I send you my bank account so you can send me 5k a month my car payment while it’s sitting waiting to get fixed ? Hmmm then I will let go. 👍🏼
lol let go ??? How about I send you my bank account so you can send me 5k a month my car payment while it’s sitting waiting to get fixed ? Hmmm then I will let go. 👍🏼
Generally cheaper cars are earlier to DIY. As a general rule the more expensive a car is the more complex it is and the more difficult it is to maintain. A lot of lamborghini models are the same way.
as far as it being a 300k car you didn’t buy a 300k car. You bought a 50k car with 250k in options and performance enhancements but the quality is the same as any C8. Most know this going in and accept it given the fact that you can’t tough the ZR1 performance for anything in the price range. Not making excuses for GM but stating the reality. If people continue to buy GM will not improve.
no different then the higher trim level dashes or headlight misalignment with the front bumper. Plenty of issues have been recurring since the C6 generation and GM just doesn’t care.
Generally cheaper cars are earlier to DIY. As a general rule the more expensive a car is the more complex it is and the more difficult it is to maintain. A lot of lamborghini models are the same way.
as far as it being a 300k car you didn’t buy a 300k car. You bought a 50k car with 250k in options and performance enhancements but the quality is the same as any C8. Most know this going in and accept it given the fact that you can’t tough the ZR1 performance for anything in the price range. Not making excuses for GM but stating the reality. If people continue to buy GM will not improve.
no different then the higher trim level dashes or headlight misalignment with the front bumper. Plenty of issues have been recurring since the C6 generation and GM just doesn’t care.
Very true to a certain extend but in my case a rear axle warning with a valve body needs to be replaced with less than 100
miles on the car is something to make noise for, I’m not the only one and this issue is on going thing with zo6 as well so other potential clients needs to be aware of this issue. If I knew about it from the beginning I would of bought a Huracan Evo instead, the numbers are impressive on the car but other aspects you mentioned is very bad still on the car and even at 50k car should not have so many issues if you have to compare that with a 20-30k Japanese cars. There is no excuse to have a poor quality control, almost every C8 I’ve seen at a dealer show room got some panels,
dash, doors misalignment issues, at least I think it’s fair to talk about it.