2nd US date for F1 race ??
#1
Team Owner
Thread Starter
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Raleigh / Rolesville NC
Posts: 43,084
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
25 Posts
2nd US date for F1 race ??
F1 principals say they intend to have a 2nd USA date mainly due
to the importance of the North American market to the companies.
Nice interview in detail about F1's future.
http://www.fia.com/mediacentre/Press...161106-01.html
MM = FIA President Max Mosley & BG= Burkhard Göschel,
Senior Adviser To The BMW Board And Chairman Of The GPMA.( Grand Prix Managment Assciation)
a few quotes:
Here is a good one:
My take on some of this, is some of the far away F1 races are only getting 30,000 or so spectators and the Governments are paying the costs.
Manufactures are very interested in markets to sell cars. But specialty sports cars sales are mainly in parts of Europe and the US with Spain having the highest growth. Countries with the highest consumer markets and highest standard of living are markets for F1 and Sports GT racing.
China, India, South America and the former Russian republics are still makets for mass producted automobles, not specialty high end sports cars. Or at least not in quantity. There for the Manufactures invovlment would limit high end races, like F1 in these markets.
Formula One Managment would like a second Grax Prix in the US. The US is the highest consumer market for automobles. However, the US promotors will not pay Mr. Ecclestones price. A new way to work with US promotors and venues will need to be explored.
to the importance of the North American market to the companies.
Nice interview in detail about F1's future.
http://www.fia.com/mediacentre/Press...161106-01.html
MM = FIA President Max Mosley & BG= Burkhard Göschel,
Senior Adviser To The BMW Board And Chairman Of The GPMA.( Grand Prix Managment Assciation)
a few quotes:
We want to make the research work done in F1 not just cost-effective but also road relevant. That is to say, new developments in F1 should be those that are directly helpful to the car industry and in particular things which are relevant to perhaps the biggest single issue which confronts the car industry worldwide, namely the reduction of the output of CO2. That’s why in the shorter term we are looking at energy-recovery and re-use from braking. That will come in 2009. We will come out with a regulation before the end of this year. And then recovery and re-use of the excess heat or waste heat from the engines. We intend to have a regulation for that before 2010. Both those things are currently fundamental to road car research.
In the longer term we are looking at the possibility of a completely new F1 engine reflecting the industry tendency which is to have a downsized, turbo-charged engine. At the moment that is still a discussion point between us and the manufacturers. That very briefly is where we stand at the moment.
In the longer term we are looking at the possibility of a completely new F1 engine reflecting the industry tendency which is to have a downsized, turbo-charged engine. At the moment that is still a discussion point between us and the manufacturers. That very briefly is where we stand at the moment.
Q: What do you both feel will be a competitive budget for a team in F1 under the new regulations?
MM: What we feel would be reasonable would be an F1 team with not more than 200 employees and able to run at the front for a budget in the order of Euros 100m. That is the objective. Now I’m not saying we have yet done the things that allow that objective to be achieved but that is the objective.
MM: What we feel would be reasonable would be an F1 team with not more than 200 employees and able to run at the front for a budget in the order of Euros 100m. That is the objective. Now I’m not saying we have yet done the things that allow that objective to be achieved but that is the objective.
Q. How important are F1 races in Europe?
MM: They’re important but there are still a disproportionate number of races in Europe.
Q: But we are running out of races in Europe year on year…
MM: Well this is the trend. If you look at the Olympic Games, for instance, over the last 100 years around 50% of them have been in Europe and that is a little bit out of balance and we are even worse. But we will get to the right balance between European and non-European races as markets development. Places like India, China, Russia, South America, Central America, they are all very important markets.
BG: There are some questions to solve. For European car manufacturers, for example, Europe and the US are the biggest markets. There might be very fast growth in China, but more or less these are mass production cars. But in India the growth is a lot slower than China.
The US is still the most important market in the world. It is an area where F1 still has some weaknesses. There might be an interest from the car manufacturers to improve the situation in the US.
MM: They’re important but there are still a disproportionate number of races in Europe.
Q: But we are running out of races in Europe year on year…
MM: Well this is the trend. If you look at the Olympic Games, for instance, over the last 100 years around 50% of them have been in Europe and that is a little bit out of balance and we are even worse. But we will get to the right balance between European and non-European races as markets development. Places like India, China, Russia, South America, Central America, they are all very important markets.
BG: There are some questions to solve. For European car manufacturers, for example, Europe and the US are the biggest markets. There might be very fast growth in China, but more or less these are mass production cars. But in India the growth is a lot slower than China.
The US is still the most important market in the world. It is an area where F1 still has some weaknesses. There might be an interest from the car manufacturers to improve the situation in the US.
Q: But the European promoters are ready to pay the money that Bernie is asking whereas in Bahrain and Malaysia, for instance, we have just 30,000 spectators and the government is paying for it. So is the future of F1 just to ask if there is a government that pays the money?
MM: There are two points here. In the existing arrangements with FOM we have a clause that FOM cannot propose a calendar which involves the cancellation of a traditional event without the consent of the FIA. So we have a safety net there. But I don’t doubt that when the manufacturers come to do their agreement they will ensure that part of their commercial interests in terms of the location of the races are taken into account. That will get resolved and as Burkhard said, America and Europe are the two biggest markets for them. So we would like to see another race in North America and probably not lose that many in Europe. The ultimate sacrifice may have to be made by the teams having 20 races. That is to be discussed.
Q: Given what Max has said do you feel it is important to have a race in Germany? In France? UK?
BG: Yes. In Germany, France, UK, Italy and a new market which is very strong is Spain. But we have to discuss it because there are a limited number of races. But Europe is still a very important issue for the car manufacturers. As is the US.
MM: There are two points here. In the existing arrangements with FOM we have a clause that FOM cannot propose a calendar which involves the cancellation of a traditional event without the consent of the FIA. So we have a safety net there. But I don’t doubt that when the manufacturers come to do their agreement they will ensure that part of their commercial interests in terms of the location of the races are taken into account. That will get resolved and as Burkhard said, America and Europe are the two biggest markets for them. So we would like to see another race in North America and probably not lose that many in Europe. The ultimate sacrifice may have to be made by the teams having 20 races. That is to be discussed.
Q: Given what Max has said do you feel it is important to have a race in Germany? In France? UK?
BG: Yes. In Germany, France, UK, Italy and a new market which is very strong is Spain. But we have to discuss it because there are a limited number of races. But Europe is still a very important issue for the car manufacturers. As is the US.
Manufactures are very interested in markets to sell cars. But specialty sports cars sales are mainly in parts of Europe and the US with Spain having the highest growth. Countries with the highest consumer markets and highest standard of living are markets for F1 and Sports GT racing.
China, India, South America and the former Russian republics are still makets for mass producted automobles, not specialty high end sports cars. Or at least not in quantity. There for the Manufactures invovlment would limit high end races, like F1 in these markets.
Formula One Managment would like a second Grax Prix in the US. The US is the highest consumer market for automobles. However, the US promotors will not pay Mr. Ecclestones price. A new way to work with US promotors and venues will need to be explored.
Last edited by AU N EGL; 11-26-2006 at 12:43 PM.
#4
Safety Car
Originally Posted by ghoffman
Yea, and I wish they would go back to the Glen and Long Beach.
#5
Team Owner
Thread Starter
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Raleigh / Rolesville NC
Posts: 43,084
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
25 Posts
Originally Posted by gkmccready
How about the Glen and Laguna Seca? Or Mosport and Laguna? I wonder which tracks actually have enough safe runoff...
California would be a very good market. Doesn't Toyota now owning Laguna ??
#6
Originally Posted by ghoffman
Mosport would be a 2rd Canadian GP (good idea anyway). The Glen has all of the NASCAR required facilities, but what a hassle to get in and out of.
#7
Safety Car
Originally Posted by ghoffman
Mosport would be a 2rd Canadian GP (good idea anyway). The Glen has all of the NASCAR required facilities, but what a hassle to get in and out of. Maybe some enterprising individual could offer a helo service in and out.
If NASCAR facilities are what it would take, Sears Point (er, Infinion) could fit the bill. Unfortunately, I think both Laguna and Sears have the potential to be very boring F1 races. Not that many are exciting these days, but you know what I mean.
#8
Le Mans Master
Usgp
I raced in a vintage support race at the USGP at Dallas, Texas in July 1984. More than 300,000 people attended over 3 days. The race was held on a street course in the State Fairgrounds. The weather was some of the hottest ever measured for a F1 race (above 104 degrees) and Nigel Mansel passed out cold while trying to push his Lotus across the finish line. However, with 300,000 attendees, the race was a commercial flop. The F1 race at Las Vegas never attracted more than a few thousand diehard fans. It was also a commercial flop. Bernie Ecclestone wants too much money for his product. American viewers just don't care! My wife and I attended every F1 race at Watkins Glen in the 70s. The racing was amazing. We walked around in the pits and spoke with all the F1 drivers, and team principals and personalities of their time. However, most remember only the "BOG", and the burning of the Brazilian fan's bus with all their luggage.
I would vote for the Glen first, and Road America (Elkhart Lake) second. However, that will never happen. It's all about "Market" and "Money".
I would vote for the Glen first, and Road America (Elkhart Lake) second. However, that will never happen. It's all about "Market" and "Money".
#9
Originally Posted by 63Corvette
I would vote for the Glen first, and Road America (Elkhart Lake) second. However, that will never happen. It's all about "Market" and "Money".
#10
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Feb 2000
Location: Bedford NH
Posts: 5,708
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Cruise-In II Veteran
Originally Posted by gkmccready
How about the Glen and Laguna Seca? Or Mosport and Laguna? I wonder which tracks actually have enough safe runoff...
#11
Originally Posted by gkmccready
"Mazda Raceway at Laguna Seca" is the official name these days.
#12
Safety Car
Originally Posted by AU N EGL
California would be a very good market. Doesn't Toyota now owning Laguna ??
#13
Safety Car
Originally Posted by 63Corvette
My wife and I attended every F1 race at Watkins Glen in the 70s. The racing was amazing. We walked around in the pits and spoke with all the F1 drivers, and team principals and personalities of their time.
I'd have given my left one to speak with some of the drivers from the 70s - and the 80s. Sadly Clark (1968) was already gone.
Best Venue for success, in the USA, is probably a Vegas street race. Brings in the high rollers and the Glitz and Glam. It will make the pages of "People" mag and that is neccessary. It's the way Bernie built it in the 1980's - made it glamorous.
My .02
....any existing track would have to be upgraded to FIA standards. Rules out most according to Bernie and Chris Pook.
Last edited by Bink; 11-26-2006 at 04:36 PM.
#15
Le Mans Master
Since they reconfigured Laguna Seca for MotoGP, the track probably meets all or most of the FIA requirements for a GP. HOWEVER, for those of you who have not been there in a while, traffic is impossible unless you helicopter in. The roads are all two lane, and parking lots most of every day....even without a race. Traffic flow is in the front gate, and out the back gate aftera a race. This puts you MILES from anywhere after a race, and no directions other than follow the leader to get home.
#19
Originally Posted by Pursuit_in_Progress
I think Road America would be a great F1 venue. Definately force some tough choices on the amount of wing to use.
I'm not much for street courses, but I'd love to see F1 at Long Beach again. I'd rather watch a Long Beach race any day over the roval at IMS.
#20
Safety Car
Originally Posted by xsiveone
I'm not much for street courses, but I'd love to see F1 at Long Beach again. I'd rather watch a Long Beach race any day over the roval at IMS.