Racing classes for next year - ST2/3/GT2/3 and their TT variants
#1
Safety Car
Thread Starter
Racing classes for next year - ST2/3/GT2/3 and their TT variants
New ST/TT guidelines are out. I am interested to hear where people are headed. There look to be four options, unless you want to head down to PTB.
NASA
ST3 - 9,5:1, available -.5 mod for no aero, I assume the prior -.4 for 275s is still around
ST2 - 8:0:1 - no non-aero mod bonus , same old rules with some bones thrown in odd directions
NARRA
GT3 - 8:75:1, -.4 discount for the 275s, no penalty for slicks
GT3 - 7.5:1, no penalty for slicks
NASA ST/TT Guiedlines
NARRA Rules
NASA
ST3 - 9,5:1, available -.5 mod for no aero, I assume the prior -.4 for 275s is still around
ST2 - 8:0:1 - no non-aero mod bonus , same old rules with some bones thrown in odd directions
NARRA
GT3 - 8:75:1, -.4 discount for the 275s, no penalty for slicks
GT3 - 7.5:1, no penalty for slicks
NASA ST/TT Guiedlines
NARRA Rules
Last edited by RX-Ben; 10-06-2012 at 06:37 PM.
#2
Drifting
For NASA, were can a mostly stock TTA c5 z06 play without adding $$$ suspension and brakes that are allowed in TT3?
I'd like to keep my car as is and just continue to play in TT. 3250 lbs / 360 hp = 9.02:1.
I guess I could have added more power since I run 275's to bring it down to the .4 mod factor we're allowed for the 275's in both NASA and NARRA but I didn't realize that until 3/4's through the season.
I'd like to keep my car as is and just continue to play in TT. 3250 lbs / 360 hp = 9.02:1.
I guess I could have added more power since I run 275's to bring it down to the .4 mod factor we're allowed for the 275's in both NASA and NARRA but I didn't realize that until 3/4's through the season.
Last edited by 2MCHPWR; 10-06-2012 at 11:49 AM.
#4
Safety Car
Thread Starter
fixed the ambiguity. I tried to put a poll here, I'll post it separately. Sometimes I'm real bad at the internet.
Stock C5Z is still TT3. Transmission is now universally open.
Stock C5Z is still TT3. Transmission is now universally open.
#5
Drifting
Base C5s are also ST1/2/3 and no longer allowed in PTB*/TTB*.
What a goat-screw!!!!
My car went from being a nationally competitive PTA/TTA car to a DE3/4 car overnight.
What a goat-screw!!!!
My car went from being a nationally competitive PTA/TTA car to a DE3/4 car overnight.
#6
Safety Car
Thread Starter
Well, you aren't the only one to suffer the effects of a destroyed PT/TTA market.
Hmm, I think that is still an open point and can't see a reason why they would kill he PTB/TTB option.
Hmm, I think that is still an open point and can't see a reason why they would kill he PTB/TTB option.
#7
Hey i am think of racing my C6 ls2 vette next year,, its a track only car with full cage,, some aero with a wing and front splitter,,, the motor is a ls 2 with cam , intake headers, brakes are big brembo front and stock z06 rear... Moton Coilovers... 3200lb.
what class would i fit into in Nasa and Scca... ?
Manny
what class would i fit into in Nasa and Scca... ?
Manny
#8
Drifting
Depends on your rear wheel HP, most likely ST2 for NASA unless you have big power 8 to 1 ratio for ST2 next year. As my car sits right now I can go 406 at the wheels with the new 8to1..
SCCA= STO most likely, stick around --STO changes are due out Monday.
Rumor has it they are making changes to STO to a point where T1 cars and STO may fit in the same class?
SCCA= STO most likely, stick around --STO changes are due out Monday.
Rumor has it they are making changes to STO to a point where T1 cars and STO may fit in the same class?
#10
Depends on your rear wheel HP, most likely ST2 for NASA unless you have big power 8 to 1 ratio for ST2 next year. As my car sits right now I can go 406 at the wheels with the new 8to1..
SCCA= STO most likely, stick around --STO changes are due out Monday.
Rumor has it they are making changes to STO to a point where T1 cars and STO may fit in the same class?
SCCA= STO most likely, stick around --STO changes are due out Monday.
Rumor has it they are making changes to STO to a point where T1 cars and STO may fit in the same class?
#11
Pro
Ben,
I am torn. Maybe move to ST2. But, I am also thinking ST3\STR3. My aero is easily removeable. So, I could set wt\hp for ST3 without aero, and add the aero if car count is better in STR3 as there is no penalty in STR3 for aero.
I am torn. Maybe move to ST2. But, I am also thinking ST3\STR3. My aero is easily removeable. So, I could set wt\hp for ST3 without aero, and add the aero if car count is better in STR3 as there is no penalty in STR3 for aero.
New ST/TT guidelines are out. I am interested to hear where people are headed. There look to be four options, unless you want to head down to PTB.
NASA
ST3 - 9,5:1, available -.5 mod for no aero, I assume the prior -.4 for 275s is still around
ST2 - 8:0:1 - no non-aero mod bonus , same old rules with some bones thrown in odd directions
NARRA
GT3 - 8:75:1, -.4 discount for the 275s, no penalty for slicks
GT3 - 7.5:1, no penalty for slicks
NASA ST/TT Guiedlines
NARRA Rules
NASA
ST3 - 9,5:1, available -.5 mod for no aero, I assume the prior -.4 for 275s is still around
ST2 - 8:0:1 - no non-aero mod bonus , same old rules with some bones thrown in odd directions
NARRA
GT3 - 8:75:1, -.4 discount for the 275s, no penalty for slicks
GT3 - 7.5:1, no penalty for slicks
NASA ST/TT Guiedlines
NARRA Rules
#12
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Raleigh / Rolesville NC
Posts: 43,084
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
25 Posts
Hey i am think of racing my C6 ls2 vette next year,, its a track only car with full cage,, some aero with a wing and front splitter,,, the motor is a ls 2 with cam , intake headers, brakes are big brembo front and stock z06 rear... Moton Coilovers... 3200lb.
what class would i fit into in Nasa and Scca... ?
Manny
what class would i fit into in Nasa and Scca... ?
Manny
What is the rear wheel hp?
3200 lbs+ 225 of you = 3225 lbs
3225 / 8.0 ( NASA ST2 ) = 403 RWHP
if you have MORE then 403 rwhp then it would be NASA ST1 class.
Think I have that right
SCCA maybe STO but may need a TB restrictor plate depending on RWHP
First thing is to get your RWHP off of a dyno jet
Last edited by AU N EGL; 10-07-2012 at 09:07 AM.
#13
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Raleigh / Rolesville NC
Posts: 43,084
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
25 Posts
ST2 3250 / 8 = 406 rwhp
so 400 rwhp, hmmm for ST2.
and
OUCH
does this mean no more PTA for C5Zs or PTB C5 Coupes ?
but could be ST3 3250 / 9 = 361 rwhp
( Plus or Minus modifications points )
I am reading this correctly ?
so 400 rwhp, hmmm for ST2.
and
12) Revoke all C5 Corvette Dyno re-classes and move the Base classing in the PT and TT
Rules to ST/SU (TT1,2,3)
Rules to ST/SU (TT1,2,3)
does this mean no more PTA for C5Zs or PTB C5 Coupes ?
but could be ST3 3250 / 9 = 361 rwhp
( Plus or Minus modifications points )
I am reading this correctly ?
Last edited by AU N EGL; 10-07-2012 at 09:14 AM.
#14
Safety Car
Thread Starter
I see that now and I don't understand it (actually I do, but not from a performance standpoint). So the C5 has been converted to an "S-U-R" car, in all its feeble variations, overnight.
All the competitors driving the following cars have also experienced the same upheaval. Given their consistent participation and support in the TT/PT classes, I expect a huge outcry.
BMW - 2006-2008 M5/M6
Ford - '07-'09 Shelby GT500, 2012 Mustang Boss 302
Lotus - Exige S, Espirit V8 TT,
Mercedes - SL65 AMG, E63 AMG, CLK63 AMG, CL65 AMG
Nissan - 2009 370Z Nismo,
Ferrari - 355, 456 GT, Testarossa
Porsche - 997 CS, 997 Club Coupe, 997 C4S, 997 C4, 996 Turbo, 996 C4S
All the competitors driving the following cars have also experienced the same upheaval. Given their consistent participation and support in the TT/PT classes, I expect a huge outcry.
BMW - 2006-2008 M5/M6
Ford - '07-'09 Shelby GT500, 2012 Mustang Boss 302
Lotus - Exige S, Espirit V8 TT,
Mercedes - SL65 AMG, E63 AMG, CLK63 AMG, CL65 AMG
Nissan - 2009 370Z Nismo,
Ferrari - 355, 456 GT, Testarossa
Porsche - 997 CS, 997 Club Coupe, 997 C4S, 997 C4, 996 Turbo, 996 C4S
#16
Safety Car
Thread Starter
http://www.nasaforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=66311
#17
SCCA similarly has destabilized it's racers. The nation of club racers is not happy. Since both major clubs have done this at the same time there is no where to jump for rules stability. 2013 is going to be a very bad year as we all play musical chairs for probably a drop in net drivers as some just plain park cars until the dust settles.
#18
Safety Car
Thread Starter
My comment was tongue-in-cheek given that the cars I listed don't compete (or at least not consistently) in NASA TT/PT. But your comment is still on point.
On the upside, the NASA rules are now much closer to the NARRA rules, though I realize that NARRA isn't an option for all.
On the upside, the NASA rules are now much closer to the NARRA rules, though I realize that NARRA isn't an option for all.
#19
Burning Brakes
SCCA similarly has destabilized it's racers. The nation of club racers is not happy. Since both major clubs have done this at the same time there is no where to jump for rules stability. 2013 is going to be a very bad year as we all play musical chairs for probably a drop in net drivers as some just plain park cars until the dust settles.
#20
Burning Brakes
So who is going ST3 and who is going ST2 in NASA. I was on the fence but given the low potential car counts in ST3 in TX, I may up the power to get to 8.0/1, especially since I blew up my LS2 this weekend
JK
JK