One more call to stamp pad experts to check out my 62 pad and vin tag
#1
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Watkinsville, GA and Glen Cove, NY
Posts: 5,798
Received 857 Likes
on
628 Posts
One more call to stamp pad experts to check out my 62 pad and vin tag
Call it corvetteforum paranoia or curiosity but I am finally getting this 62 together and am starting to log photos and numbers and was curious if this stamp pad would get full credit if it was judged. It looks great to me as the broach marks appear clearly as well. Also, take a look a the vin tag and tell me if it appears to be the original fastening. Thanks to all. The car is a 340 horse 4 speed car. The casting date on the block is sept. 28 1961. It appears from the pic, I need to get the little bit of paint out of a couple numbers.
Bill
Bill
Last edited by 69ttop502; 02-11-2009 at 03:57 PM.
#2
Race Director
Member Since: Nov 2000
Location: Beverly Hills (Pine Ridge) Florida
Posts: 10,156
Received 528 Likes
on
377 Posts
Looks good. Your vin tag looks better than mine (they hit mine with the spot welder a couple of times on each end).
But I am sure you will get some "fails" (glass 1/2 empty guys). On the last engine pad "test", they said that the pad should not of been painted, so no reason for paint to be in the lettering.
Plasticman
But I am sure you will get some "fails" (glass 1/2 empty guys). On the last engine pad "test", they said that the pad should not of been painted, so no reason for paint to be in the lettering.
Plasticman
Last edited by Plasticman; 02-11-2009 at 06:27 PM.
#5
Team Owner
Yup! Looks very close to the pad on my original '61 motor...
#9
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Watkinsville, GA and Glen Cove, NY
Posts: 5,798
Received 857 Likes
on
628 Posts
Actually Mike, I am more interested if this appears to be factory original as this car will never be presented for judging by me. Now the next owner I can't say. It is fun going through the car and checking numbers and casting dates to see what seems original and not. I will be selling the car in a month or so, so I am putting together all the info for potential buyers.
Bill
Bill
#11
Platinum Supporting Dealership
Can't say on the VIN tag since I know nothing about how they should be on a 62, but I would say your stamp pad appears to be the real deal.
__________________
Tom Hendricks tom@budschevy.com
Corvette Specialist Since 1993
BUDS CHEVROLET
St. Marys, Ohio
800-688-2837
WEBSITE WWW.BUDSCHEVY.COM
HOURS MON-WED 7:00AM - 5:00PM
FFRIDAY AND SATURDAY BY APPT.
OFF THURSDAYS
NCRS # 23758 Miami Valley Chapter ( Ohio )
NCM Founding Member #1143
NADA Classic Car Guide Advisiory Board Member
C5/C6 Registry Corporate Member # 5
My Corvettes. 63, 71, 73, 78.
Tom Hendricks tom@budschevy.com
Facebook Post
Corvette Specialist Since 1993
BUDS CHEVROLET
St. Marys, Ohio
800-688-2837
WEBSITE WWW.BUDSCHEVY.COM
HOURS MON-WED 7:00AM - 5:00PM
FFRIDAY AND SATURDAY BY APPT.
OFF THURSDAYS
NCRS # 23758 Miami Valley Chapter ( Ohio )
NCM Founding Member #1143
NADA Classic Car Guide Advisiory Board Member
C5/C6 Registry Corporate Member # 5
My Corvettes. 63, 71, 73, 78.
#13
Nice picture of the 461X head symbol. The flat top hump symbol is from a pre-February 1962 head.
Ray
Ray
Call it corvetteforum paranoia or curiosity but I am finally getting this 62 together and am starting to log photos and numbers and was curious if this stamp pad would get full credit if it was judged. It looks great to me as the broach marks appear clearly as well. Also, take a look a the vin tag and tell me if it appears to be the original fastening. Thanks to all. The car is a 340 horse 4 speed car. The casting date on the block is sept. 28 1961. It appears from the pic, I need to get the little bit of paint out of a couple numbers.
Bill
Bill
#14
When GM machined the block decks they used a machine tool called a surface broach. This machine uses a tool that has rows (and columns) of teeth which are drawn across the block longitudinally (along the axis of the crankshaft).
The broaching process leaves tool marks (typically referred to as broach marks) from the teeth.
If you look at the (excellent) photos carefully, you'll see some fine lines that are perpendicular to the stamped numbers and letters. Those are the broach marks
If you take your block to a machine shop to have the block decked, they would machine away the top surface of the block's decks and remove the factory broach marks (and stampings). Typically a machine shop would use a circular cutter that would leave circular tool marks.
I hope this helps...
#15
I see you are new so please either check the archives or look in the FAQ sticky thread at the top of the C1/C2section. This question is raised often.
#16
Administrator
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: About 1100 miles from where I call home. Blue lives matter.
Posts: 51,498
Received 5,359 Likes
on
2,787 Posts
#17
Administrator
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: About 1100 miles from where I call home. Blue lives matter.
Posts: 51,498
Received 5,359 Likes
on
2,787 Posts
If someone stated that because at some time, over a 47 year time span, somebody, somewhere got paint on the pad, thereby casting doubt on the veracity of the numbers, I would politely disregard their opinion.
#18
Le Mans Master
Maybe he noticed the VERY uneven depth of the stampings and the oddity in the upper left of the stamp pad, as if the pad was resurfaced with the head installed. I'm not an expert but it looks questionable compared to the many pads I've seen up close.
#19
Le Mans Master
Now think about it. As the numbers were used some of them got worn more than others.
Thus the "uneven depth" (as you put it) in the numbers.
Do you really think that GM would only use a number once then throw it away?
#20