Coolant temp sensor with vortec heads
#4
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Oxford MA-----You just lost the game!!!!
Posts: 5,948
Likes: 0
Received 62 Likes
on
52 Posts
Yep, there's more than one way to skin a cat! I'm thinking about moving my sensor up to the intake just because I don't like that wire so close to the header. Good luck with however you decide to go.
Keep the shiny side up!
Scott
Keep the shiny side up!
Scott
#5
Racer
Thread Starter
The engine is assembled and already in the car so enlarging the hole at this time is not an option. The simple solutions are sometimes right in front of you.
BK- Everything good with your relocation? That would put the sensor above the top of the radiator. Just askin.....
BK- Everything good with your relocation? That would put the sensor above the top of the radiator. Just askin.....
#7
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Oxford MA-----You just lost the game!!!!
Posts: 5,948
Likes: 0
Received 62 Likes
on
52 Posts
Keep the shiny side up!
Scott
#8
Racer
#9
Drifting
You can see the sender sort of hidden under the fuel line.
Pete
#10
Drifting
Use a brass NPT pipe adapter to fit. DO NOT put that sensor anywhere other than on the intake. I tried to clean up my engine bay and ran the sensor to a plug on one of the heads. HOLY SHI+ the head temp is WAY higher than the coolant temp at the thermostat housing, and it varies wildly with engine operating.
#13
Racer
Thread Starter
gkz You don't happen to have the ohm readings at various temps for this sender do you? If the readings at 200 deg are close it will work fine
peteZ06 your sender is where my heater line nipple goes. I have two ports by 7 or 8 cylinder I can use. I like taking the temp in the head ports because it does give the highest reading. Did you paint your valve covers or did they come that way?
Thanks
peteZ06 your sender is where my heater line nipple goes. I have two ports by 7 or 8 cylinder I can use. I like taking the temp in the head ports because it does give the highest reading. Did you paint your valve covers or did they come that way?
Thanks
#14
Racer
#15
Drifting
gkz You don't happen to have the ohm readings at various temps for this sender do you? If the readings at 200 deg are close it will work fine
peteZ06 your sender is where my heater line nipple goes. I have two ports by 7 or 8 cylinder I can use. I like taking the temp in the head ports because it does give the highest reading. Did you paint your valve covers or did they come that way?
Thanks
peteZ06 your sender is where my heater line nipple goes. I have two ports by 7 or 8 cylinder I can use. I like taking the temp in the head ports because it does give the highest reading. Did you paint your valve covers or did they come that way?
Thanks
You say if readings are close, it will work fine, yet you say the head readings are higher than the intake readings. Not so. The coolant flies by the sender so fast it doesn't matter if it is in the head or intake. The correct sender for the gauge in the intake is more accurate than a "close at 200°" wrong sender in the head.
The valve covers are C4 magnesium and are painted, you cannot polish or plate magnesium.
#16
Le Mans Master
Member Since: May 2002
Location: Lebanon Township New Jersey
Posts: 5,005
Received 706 Likes
on
401 Posts
Just getting back to the location issue. I've had the sensor in the intake for years. It seems accurate. I fill my system thru the tstat location so the area where the sensor is located is flooded.
#17
Race Director
#18
Melting Slicks
Installed Vortec heads back in 2000. Went to the local hardware store and basically searched through their brass fittings assortment until I found one that fit the vortec head (male end). I then combined several more brass fittings so that I ended up with adapters that allowed the engine temp gauge to mate with the vortec head. I have my electric fan temp gauge connected to the manifold. Never had an issue with either.
#19
heck...for 12 bucks I'll try it....
many thanks