C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

LT1 shorty vs. long tube header results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2003, 12:45 AM
  #1  
VMAX451
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
VMAX451's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Cincinnati OH
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default LT1 shorty vs. long tube header results

First off a disclaimer:
Different dynos, but both Dynojet 248C's, so if this means the results are completely bogus then disregard the rest of this...

Anyways, in case this is of interest to anyone, I recently swapped out my Hooker 2061-1 ceramic coated shorty headers for the new design Exotic Muscle long tube headers. There were no other changes. The results:
+14.8 rwhp, +15.6 rwtq

Pretty much what I expected. Torque was up consistently across the range.

Here are the charts:

New, with long tubes:



Previously with shorty's:



Unfortunately the dyno shop was unable to give me copy of the data files so I couldn't do a direct overlay, but here is a crude version from the raw data:



So are shorty's worthless? I don't know, I would have to swap the LT's with the stock manifolds and dyno again, which I am not going to do. But it appears that the LT's do perform noticeably better and do not cost much more.

For reference, the other mods are Corsa exhaust, 160 stat, Ed Wright custom prom, LPE 211 cam, and the usual free mods. Heads are stock but were cleaned up a little when I had them off one time.

Anyways just another data point for anyone considering going to long tubes. :seeya
Old 04-07-2003, 12:48 AM
  #2  
vader86
Team Owner
 
vader86's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Athens AL
Posts: 59,654
Received 1,401 Likes on 1,017 Posts
C7 of the Year - Unmodified Finalist 2021
C4 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019

Default Re: LT1 shorty vs. long tube header results (Vince Ivanc)

:cheers: about what i expected
Old 04-07-2003, 10:12 AM
  #3  
Drewdog
Le Mans Master
 
Drewdog's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 6,473
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cruise-In III Veteran
Cruise-In IV Veteran

Default Re: LT1 shorty vs. long tube header results (Vince Ivanc)

thanks for the info :thumbs:
Old 04-07-2003, 10:34 AM
  #4  
Nathan Plemons
Race Director
 
Nathan Plemons's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Posts: 14,165
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default Re: LT1 shorty vs. long tube header results (Vince Ivanc)

:cheers: Very good, thanks for the info. I'm glad that somebody finally took the time to do a comparison between shorties and long tubes.

Although it's a healthy gain on peak numbers they still don't tell the whole story. Notice how your torque only falls to 300 now where as it used to fall off to 250! That's a 50 pound of torque increase at that particular RPM. That's the sort of thing that peak numbers will never show.

One thing that is curious to me is how your torque curve still remained so smooth. I'm running a Hot Cam as you probably know and my power gains with headers were very impressive, but my gain came in the form of a larger power spike. Although I lost nothing on the low end I got a huge gain in mid - high RPM range. At about 3000 rpm's my graph jumps up about 40 pounds of torque. Maybe it's the different cam, maybe it's the x-pipe and flowmasters? Maybe it's Hooker Headers vs. Exotic Muscle.

In any case long tubes were the best seat of the pants thing I have done for my car and the dyno shows why. In any case it's clear that Long Tubes are better than shorties.

I'm with you, I won't say that shorties are COMPLETELY useless, but for the cost long tubes are the better value. The only reason I can see running shorties would be if you had to have a CARB number to pass emissions, in such a case you would want to get everything you could out of the system regardless of cost.

:cheers: :cheers:
Old 04-07-2003, 10:55 AM
  #5  
VMAX451
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
VMAX451's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Cincinnati OH
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: LT1 shorty vs. long tube header results (Nathan Plemons)

Notice how your torque only falls to 300 now where as it used to fall off to 250! That's a 50 pound of torque increase at that particular RPM.
Actually it may not be quite that big of a difference, it's easy to miss but if you look close you will see that the shorty dyno runs went to 6400 whereas the later dyno runs stop at 5900. (The tach ending at 6k apparently spooked the operator.) Still it is a consistent 15 ft-lbs across the board, nothing peaky in nature at all, at least in the range shown.

One thing that is curious to me is how your torque curve still remained so smooth....At about 3000 rpm's my graph jumps up about 40 pounds of torque. Maybe it's the different cam, maybe it's the x-pipe and flowmasters? Maybe it's Hooker Headers vs. Exotic Muscle.
I too was curious about that, I remembered seeing the torque bump in yours when you originally added the LT's. I think there may be an explanation though. If you look at the shorty plot you can see a (small) bump at 3000 rpm. The new plots don't really start until a bit after that. If the operator started the dyno run earlier we probably would have seen what you were expecting.

I didn't really look over the data until I got home. If I was paying more attention I would have asked the operator to start lower and run it up to the rev limiter like the other time, would have had a little better data then. Oh well, live and learn :) .
Old 04-07-2003, 12:41 PM
  #6  
HOWSER
Race Director
 
HOWSER's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Work
Posts: 11,765
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09

Default Re: LT1 shorty vs. long tube header results (Nathan Plemons)

What type of LT's are you running? Also, how long did they take to install? Any hang ups?

I'm wanting to go with some LT's for my 93 and I need someone with experience to give me the scoop.:yesnod:

Eric
Old 04-07-2003, 01:16 PM
  #7  
Nathan Plemons
Race Director
 
Nathan Plemons's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Posts: 14,165
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default Re: LT1 shorty vs. long tube header results (HOWSER)

If you're talking to me, it didn't take long to install the headers. It really took longer to get the stock manifolds out of the way than it did to install the headers. They are Hooker 2151's which don't have any smog provisions at all. The only hangup is that you have to turn one of the motor mount bolts around but that isn't really bad.

Any good exhaust shop should be able to make your stock catback adapt back to the headers for less than $100.
Old 04-07-2003, 01:26 PM
  #8  
HOWSER
Race Director
 
HOWSER's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Work
Posts: 11,765
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09

Default Re: LT1 shorty vs. long tube header results (Nathan Plemons)

Thanks. Are there any available that have the smog provisions?
Old 04-07-2003, 01:26 PM
  #9  
Curveit
Drifting

 
Curveit's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: San Antonio Texas
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: LT1 shorty vs. long tube header results (Vince Ivanc)

:thumbs: :cheers: Congrats!!! I'm sure thats a good bump-up from the stockers.

:chevy
Old 04-07-2003, 01:33 PM
  #10  
bogus
Team Owner
 
bogus's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: San Pedro CA
Posts: 40,144
Received 33 Likes on 31 Posts

Default Re: LT1 shorty vs. long tube header results (Curveit)

Great results... and I had nothing to do with them... so there.
Old 04-07-2003, 02:36 PM
  #11  
mackeyred96
Team Owner
 
mackeyred96's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 1999
Location: Former NCM Drag Racing coordinator, National director Corvette Challenge Spring Hill, Tennessee: Whiting, New Jersey
Posts: 32,782
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Cruise-In VI Veteran
Cruise-In VII Veteran

Default Re: LT1 shorty vs. long tube header results (Drewdog)

thanks for the info :thumbs:
:iagree: good stuff :cheers:
Old 04-07-2003, 02:37 PM
  #12  
FoolCrzy
Melting Slicks
 
FoolCrzy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2001
Location: Drive it Like You Hate it Cincinnati OH
Posts: 2,474
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: LT1 shorty vs. long tube header results (Vince Ivanc)

...And That thing SOUNDS GOOD!!!
Old 04-07-2003, 03:44 PM
  #13  
pwrful c4
Burning Brakes
 
pwrful c4's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2002
Location: royal palm beach florida
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: LT1 shorty vs. long tube header results (Vince Ivanc)

Vince,thanks for the info,it win my headder decision. :steering:
Old 04-07-2003, 04:54 PM
  #14  
Dale1990
Le Mans Master
 
Dale1990's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2002
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 5,713
Received 41 Likes on 28 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default Re: LT1 shorty vs. long tube header results (HOWSER)

Thanks. Are there any available that have the smog provisions?
Hooker 2149

Coated with AIR and EGR
Old 04-07-2003, 05:04 PM
  #15  
hngacurv
Race Director
 
hngacurv's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 17,366
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: LT1 shorty vs. long tube header results (Professor)

Good info and nice numbers. :cheers:
Old 04-07-2003, 09:25 PM
  #16  
cprgmr
Melting Slicks
 
cprgmr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Green Bay WI
Posts: 2,710
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: LT1 shorty vs. long tube header results (Vince Ivanc)

:cheers: I knew I made a good decision by getting TPiS longtubes! :)

Get notified of new replies

To LT1 shorty vs. long tube header results




Quick Reply: LT1 shorty vs. long tube header results



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:22 PM.