Got the Car dyno'd today..
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Got the Car dyno'd today..
My car is stock except for Borla mufflers and center resonator delete.
The car put down 330 who and 315 ft/lbs of torque. I was going for 350 whp. I have a 91 which is the 375 HP model.
Do these numbers sound about right for a 1991 LT5?
People at the dyno were impressed because they were expecting LT1 numbers.
The car put down 330 who and 315 ft/lbs of torque. I was going for 350 whp. I have a 91 which is the 375 HP model.
Do these numbers sound about right for a 1991 LT5?
People at the dyno were impressed because they were expecting LT1 numbers.
#2
Burning Brakes
Looks good. My '92 put down 342 rwhp. I forget the torque and this was all stock.
I want to get back on the dyno to see what the car does after modifying the car.
Hopefully that will happen this week.
I want to get back on the dyno to see what the car does after modifying the car.
Hopefully that will happen this week.
#3
Safety Car
my 91 put down 350 rwhp and 330 TQ with a 3" catback, chip, and my own plenum porting job. Once i did the long tube headers- it completely woke the hell up as the previous mods where being held back by the terrible 90-92 manifolds. I would guess it has 380-390 whp now. I also reported the intake a little wider too, but saving the headers for last really added as a package deal and it feels like 30 hp more.
#5
Le Mans Master
375 crank would give you ~ 325 wheel horse. So nothing wrong w your numbers. When you modify motors, you begin to understand what it takes to gain 10-20 hp. It's just not that easy. And it isn't simply a matter of hanging a new exhaust on. Changes to the breathing of a motor requires tuning in order to maximize results. You can go to the dyno and pick up 10-15whp w a change to timing and/or fuel.
#7
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
#8
Race Director
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Compound in the Grove, Ga.
Posts: 11,329
Received 910 Likes
on
583 Posts
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2019 C4 of Year Finalist (performance mods)
2018 C4 of Year Finalist
2015 C4 of the Year Finalist
St. Jude Donor '16
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
My 91 completely stock 12k miles on it did 324/326 back in 02 when I got it. In 07 with flowmaster catback and Marc's chip 339/346.
Last edited by FASTAZU; 10-20-2014 at 10:52 AM.
#9
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
The car did run rich up top in the rev range. It was in the 11:1 range. I thought that was leaving some power on the table.
I don't want to get a chip just yet as I would like to put longtubes on the car eventually.
Is it hard to tune the LT5?
I don't want to get a chip just yet as I would like to put longtubes on the car eventually.
Is it hard to tune the LT5?
#10
Racer
To tune is just a phone call away. Marc Halibeck 630-458-8427. I recently tied my secondaries open and got a chip from Marc. The performance is great. I just wish it would return to idle speed before the wheels stopped rolling.
#11
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: South-central Missouri
Posts: 6,314
Received 500 Likes
on
395 Posts
p
This was my "stock" 1990 Dynojet run, taken one year after I bought it. It was a "base case" run prior to the top end porting planned for that winter.
Note: It was stock except for a Borla cat-back, FYI. Dyno operator cut it off at 6000 rpm, for reasons unknown.
Note: It was stock except for a Borla cat-back, FYI. Dyno operator cut it off at 6000 rpm, for reasons unknown.
Last edited by Paul Workman; 10-31-2014 at 07:13 AM.
#12
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: altered state
Posts: 81,242
Received 3,043 Likes
on
2,602 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05
Sounds about right, know that dynos can read differently so take it with a grain of salt, enjoy the car