C5 Tech Corvette Tech/Performance: LS1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Dyno Pull numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-2014, 03:04 PM
  #1  
vettman96
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
vettman96's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas Nevada
Posts: 1,829
Received 45 Likes on 37 Posts

Default Dyno Pull numbers

A friend just had AR 1 3/4 long tubes with mid-pipe and hi flo cats and a tune on his Z06, he also has a SSI manifold on the car (M6). The final pull showed 372 rwhp and 400 lb/ft.

Those numbers sound low to me and I am looking for opinions.

Thx.

Last edited by vettman96; 11-22-2014 at 03:05 PM. Reason: addition
Old 11-22-2014, 04:23 PM
  #2  
Cheesecake 07
Racer
 
Cheesecake 07's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2012
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 398
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts

Default

My 04z did 393whp/375wtq

Kooks LT's
Kooks X
Halltech Venom

On a dynojet. His HP seems a bit low and tq a bit high as mine seemed to be typical. If it runs good at the track and seat of the pants feels good...i wouldnt sweat it. Hes in the ballpark...all dynos read different.
Old 11-22-2014, 04:38 PM
  #3  
jhopper408
Burning Brakes
 
jhopper408's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2013
Location: Port Hope MI
Posts: 1,040
Received 37 Likes on 33 Posts

Default

Mine with just about the same setup, Kooks, Vararam and tune = 384 / 372 Still not enough!

Last edited by jhopper408; 11-22-2014 at 04:42 PM.
Old 11-22-2014, 05:01 PM
  #4  
onspeed
Burning Brakes
 
onspeed's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2011
Location: Odessa TX
Posts: 1,071
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by vettman96
A friend just had AR 1 3/4 long tubes with mid-pipe and hi flo cats and a tune on his Z06, he also has a SSI manifold on the car (M6). The final pull showed 372 rwhp and 400 lb/ft.

Those numbers sound low to me and I am looking for opinions.

Thx.

SAE correction? Any chance you have the tq and hp flipped? 400 rwtq on a N/A 5.7 with stock internals sounds way too high.
Old 11-22-2014, 05:08 PM
  #5  
jhopper408
Burning Brakes
 
jhopper408's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2013
Location: Port Hope MI
Posts: 1,040
Received 37 Likes on 33 Posts

Default

Yea that tq number is incorrect.
Old 11-22-2014, 08:46 PM
  #6  
95rtturbo
Drifting
 
95rtturbo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2011
Location: Chesterfield (St. Louis) MO
Posts: 1,377
Received 40 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

Agree with the others, the HP should be higher than TQ with those mods. I have 1 7/8" AR headers with catted X pipe, a Halltech, and a tune, and mine put down 386/372 SAE. Now, I'm in the process of getting blown, so should get interesting!
Old 11-22-2014, 08:56 PM
  #7  
vettman96
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
vettman96's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas Nevada
Posts: 1,829
Received 45 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

I could have a bad number for the torque, but I know the rwhp is right,
an he also has a Halltech I think.
Old 11-22-2014, 09:55 PM
  #8  
95rtturbo
Drifting
 
95rtturbo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2011
Location: Chesterfield (St. Louis) MO
Posts: 1,377
Received 40 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

What kind of dyno? As was stated above, all dynos read differently. Mustang dynos typically read the lowest, and Dyno Dynamics also read on the low side. Even dynos of the same type read differently. 372 is a "tad" on the low side, but not way off base.
Old 11-22-2014, 11:08 PM
  #9  
onspeed
Burning Brakes
 
onspeed's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2011
Location: Odessa TX
Posts: 1,071
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Bolt on Zs are around 380 +/- 10-15 HP, power seems fine to me. The intake won't be giving any real gains over an LS6 intake with only bolt-ons.
Old 11-23-2014, 01:35 PM
  #10  
4drturbo
Instructor
 
4drturbo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2013
Location: Gardner Kansas
Posts: 228
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 95rtturbo
What kind of dyno? As was stated above, all dynos read differently. Mustang dynos typically read the lowest, and Dyno Dynamics also read on the low side. Even dynos of the same type read differently. 372 is a "tad" on the low side, but not way off base.
They don't read low. The numbers are not inflated because Mustang dynos are LOADED dynos.
Old 11-23-2014, 01:42 PM
  #11  
95rtturbo
Drifting
 
95rtturbo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2011
Location: Chesterfield (St. Louis) MO
Posts: 1,377
Received 40 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 4drturbo
They don't read low. The numbers are not inflated because Mustang dynos are LOADED dynos.
I didn't think I had to explain myself on this one... I never attempted to explain why they read lower, or which type is the "most accurate" - it really doesn't matter. They are all just tuning tools. Having said that, yes, they do typically read lower than dynojets, as I stated.

Last edited by 95rtturbo; 11-23-2014 at 01:55 PM.
Old 11-24-2014, 09:20 PM
  #12  
Toque
Tech Contributor
 
Toque's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Wylie TX --> Less is More, except under the hood !
Posts: 20,003
Received 179 Likes on 99 Posts

Default

For what he had on the car its about right (372 rwhp).
The Torque number is not right at all.

My 2004 Z06 bone stock in 2004 dyno'd 357/344.

With LG Pro headers, high flow cats, B&B bullet exhaust, Vararam intake, air bridge and a tune I got to 390/379 to the rear wheels.

I'm at 471/441 now with lots of other goodies.

Toque

Get notified of new replies

To Dyno Pull numbers




Quick Reply: Dyno Pull numbers



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 PM.