2018 changes - your thoughts?
01-17-2017, 03:37 PM
#21
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Plymouth Massachusetts
Posts: 9,477
Received 3,117 Likes
on
1,736 Posts
Finalist 2020 C7 of the Year -- Unmodified
The following 5 users liked this post by Turnt up:
Apocolips (01-18-2017),
HorsePower Junkie (01-19-2017),
PKI (01-18-2017),
Skid Row Joe (01-17-2017),
tony abbski (03-19-2017)
01-17-2017, 04:45 PM
#25
Safety Car
Member Since: Feb 2016
Location: Bainbridge Island WA
Posts: 4,980
Received 3,818 Likes
on
1,614 Posts
Tadge answered:
Many of the questions on this forum relate to trade-offs in the vehicle design process. Side Blind Zone is a perfect example.
Generally speaking, we tend to err on the side of not having a lot of alerts that would interfere with the joy of driving. The SBZ feature was just emerging as a feasible customer feature as we were designing the 7th generation Corvette. We thought very carefully about including it in the program since we knew other vehicles were going to offer it. SBZ uses sensors located on the rear outboard corner of the car, just behind the fascia. That is precisely the location we needed to package our race-derived transmission and differential coolers. Having heat exchangers in the back corners interfered with both the physical space need for the sensors and disrupted their performance. In the end, we prioritized vehicle performance over a new feature that we were not sure would be a strong customer desire. We have gotten similar feedback from several customers asking the same question. SBZ does seem to be gaining good acceptance from customers so, although not feasible in the short term, we will strongly consider that customer desire in our future plans.
Many of the questions on this forum relate to trade-offs in the vehicle design process. Side Blind Zone is a perfect example.
Generally speaking, we tend to err on the side of not having a lot of alerts that would interfere with the joy of driving. The SBZ feature was just emerging as a feasible customer feature as we were designing the 7th generation Corvette. We thought very carefully about including it in the program since we knew other vehicles were going to offer it. SBZ uses sensors located on the rear outboard corner of the car, just behind the fascia. That is precisely the location we needed to package our race-derived transmission and differential coolers. Having heat exchangers in the back corners interfered with both the physical space need for the sensors and disrupted their performance. In the end, we prioritized vehicle performance over a new feature that we were not sure would be a strong customer desire. We have gotten similar feedback from several customers asking the same question. SBZ does seem to be gaining good acceptance from customers so, although not feasible in the short term, we will strongly consider that customer desire in our future plans.
01-17-2017, 05:56 PM
#27
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_car
Sports Cars:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sports_car
Corvette:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Corvette
Thanks for that.
Sounds like Tadge has a little regret about that one.
BSM are safety equipment IMO and should be on almost every vehicle.
Hopefully, the C8 will have a pair.
01-17-2017, 06:07 PM
#28
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Posts: 40,092
Received 8,928 Likes
on
5,333 Posts
For example the latest iteration of the GTO was a heavy pig with a Corvette motor that couldn't turn when you headed into a turn at speed. The front wheels would slide sideways if competitive cornering speeds were attempted. You just had to brake hard on over loaded brakes (due to the weight) and get the speed down far enough so the car would turn Vs slide the wheels sideways across the track.
Bill
01-17-2017, 06:34 PM
#29
Melting Slicks
It isn't what disqualifies a Corvette from being a muscle car it is what disqualifies a muscle car from being a sports car. Muscle cars are limited to acceleration as their main performance feature while sports cars are well rounded and balanced with power, braking and handling complementing each other.
For example the latest iteration of the GTO was a heavy pig with a Corvette motor that couldn't turn when you headed into a turn at speed. The front wheels would slide sideways if competitive cornering speeds were attempted. You just had to brake hard on over loaded brakes (due to the weight) and get the speed down far enough so the car would turn Vs slide the wheels sideways across the track.
Bill
For example the latest iteration of the GTO was a heavy pig with a Corvette motor that couldn't turn when you headed into a turn at speed. The front wheels would slide sideways if competitive cornering speeds were attempted. You just had to brake hard on over loaded brakes (due to the weight) and get the speed down far enough so the car would turn Vs slide the wheels sideways across the track.
Bill
01-17-2017, 07:09 PM
#30
I'd gladly sacrifice trunk space for an optional retractable hard top like my Mercedes.
01-17-2017, 07:54 PM
#31
Race Director
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: The Sunshine State
Posts: 16,999
Received 2,681 Likes
on
1,482 Posts
2022 C5 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2021 C5 of the Year Finalist - Modified
C7 of the Year - Modified Finalist 2021
Finalist 2020 C7 of the Year -- Modified
2020 C5 of the Year Finalist - Modified
C5 of Year Finalist (appearance mods) 2019
2018 C5 of Year Finalist
Interesting that the just announced 2018 Mustang will have the joint GM/Ford A10 transmission. I wonder if the A10 will now work it's way from the Camaro ZL1 into other Camaro models and other GM cars although I know it's been posted that the A10 may or may not be able to fit into the Corvette.
01-17-2017, 07:55 PM
#32
01-17-2017, 08:06 PM
#33
Interesting that the just announced 2018 Mustang will have the joint GM/Ford A10 transmission. I wonder if the A10 will now work it's way from the Camaro ZL1 into other Camaro models and other GM cars although I know it's been posted that the A10 may or may not be able to fit into the Corvette.
01-18-2017, 01:18 AM
#34
Muscle Cars:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_car
Sports Cars:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sports_car
Corvette:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Corvette
Thanks for that.
Sounds like Tadge has a little regret about that one.
BSM are safety equipment IMO and should be on almost every vehicle.
Hopefully, the C8 will have a pair.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_car
Sports Cars:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sports_car
Corvette:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Corvette
Thanks for that.
Sounds like Tadge has a little regret about that one.
BSM are safety equipment IMO and should be on almost every vehicle.
Hopefully, the C8 will have a pair.
The following users liked this post:
Gonzo (01-18-2017)
The following users liked this post:
HorsePower Junkie (01-19-2017)
01-18-2017, 12:21 PM
#36
Although the C7 isn't as bad as my old CTS-V Coupe, it's still not very good IMO.
Once you have them and experience what they can do on a car it's hard to live without 'em.
01-18-2017, 02:21 PM
#38
Cool - I have them (on another car model) and don't really use them, but the wife loves the capability. We all have different preferences. It's why they offer options. Pat
Last edited by PKI; 01-18-2017 at 06:01 PM.
01-18-2017, 03:15 PM
#39
Race Director
I'm happy with the trunk just the way it is currently offered. The soft top on the C7 really is nice. Retractable hard tops always look out of proportion, even the Ford/Edsel retractable hardtops from yesteryear have cosmetic issues.
