GM Restoration Parts
#1
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
GM Restoration Parts
The following users liked this post:
Sky65 (01-20-2017)
#3
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Westminster Maryland
Posts: 30,173
Likes: 0
Received 2,878 Likes
on
2,515 Posts
Hi,
I think it's interesting to see Dobbins listed as a supplier…. especially when remembering that many, many, years ago Dobbins' little business was 'raided' by the Pennsylvania BCI at the behest of GM and charged with forgery and conspiracy!
Regards,
Alan
I think it's interesting to see Dobbins listed as a supplier…. especially when remembering that many, many, years ago Dobbins' little business was 'raided' by the Pennsylvania BCI at the behest of GM and charged with forgery and conspiracy!
Regards,
Alan
Last edited by Alan 71; 01-20-2017 at 03:58 PM.
#4
Race Director
an old doctor once told me that GM restoration parts tag only means one thing which is that someone paid the GM lawyers, it has nothing to do with quality, accuracy or country of origin and that the only thing GM cares about is that the fee has been paid, pay the fee get the GM resto tag.
#5
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
an old doctor once told me that GM restoration parts tag only means one thing which is that someone paid the GM lawyers, it has nothing to do with quality, accuracy or country of origin and that the only thing GM cares about is that the fee has been paid, pay the fee get the GM resto tag.
#6
Team Owner
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Southbound
Posts: 38,928
Likes: 0
Received 1,469 Likes
on
1,248 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran
#7
Burning Brakes
A friend bought a set of the LT-1 valve covers that were terrible. He sent them back but I would guess there must be several GM restoration parts companies doing the covers. His next set was pretty good. A real lack of consistency.
The following users liked this post:
crawfish333 (01-20-2017)
#10
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
The following users liked this post:
crawfish333 (01-20-2017)
#11
Race Director
an old doctor once told me that GM restoration parts tag only means one thing which is that someone paid the GM lawyers, it has nothing to do with quality, accuracy or country of origin and that the only thing GM cares about is that the fee has been paid, pay the fee get the GM resto tag.
All that GM Restoration Part tag means is that the maker of the part has paid a 10% royalty to GM, for the right to use a GM trademark, logo, image, etc. To my knowledge, GM does not have to approve the part, and is not involved in anyway in the manufacture, quality control, originality or correctness of the labelled part.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying they don't have the right to protect their image, through licensing agreements. They absolutely do, and they should, since they've spent years and untold dollars, creating their identity. But no one should be fooled into thinking that the Restoration Part label, means anything other than the fact that the manufacturer of a part has paid a fee to GM, so that they could use a GM logo, likeness, etc.
#12
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying they don't have the right to protect their image, through licensing agreements. They absolutely do, and they should, since they've spent years and untold dollars, creating their identity. But no one should be fooled into thinking that the Restoration Part label, means anything other than the fact that the manufacturer of a part has paid a fee to GM, so that they could use a GM logo, likeness, etc.
#13
Le Mans Master
Member Since: May 2008
Posts: 8,970
Received 2,687 Likes
on
1,414 Posts
2022 C3 of the Year Finalist - Modified
Dr.
an old doctor once told me that GM restoration parts tag only means one thing which is that someone paid the GM lawyers, it has nothing to do with quality, accuracy or country of origin and that the only thing GM cares about is that the fee has been paid, pay the fee get the GM resto tag.
I wouldn't buy anything from him no matter how good he claims his products are. I will buy my stuff from Zip.....how about that doc.
Last edited by Torqued Off; 01-20-2017 at 07:21 PM.
#14
Le Mans Master
Member Since: May 2008
Posts: 8,970
Received 2,687 Likes
on
1,414 Posts
2022 C3 of the Year Finalist - Modified
Quality
You are absolutely correct. The GM Restoration Part program is all about GM protecting their trademarks and copyrights, not the manufacture of reproduction parts.
All that GM Restoration Part tag means is that the maker of the part has paid a 10% royalty to GM, for the right to use a GM trademark, logo, image, etc. To my knowledge, GM does not have to approve the part, and is not involved in anyway in the manufacture, quality control, originality or correctness of the labelled part.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying they don't have the right to protect their image, through licensing agreements. They absolutely do, and they should, since they've spent years and untold dollars, creating their identity. But no one should be fooled into thinking that the Restoration Part label, means anything other than the fact that the manufacturer of a part has paid a fee to GM, so that they could use a GM logo, likeness, etc.
All that GM Restoration Part tag means is that the maker of the part has paid a 10% royalty to GM, for the right to use a GM trademark, logo, image, etc. To my knowledge, GM does not have to approve the part, and is not involved in anyway in the manufacture, quality control, originality or correctness of the labelled part.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying they don't have the right to protect their image, through licensing agreements. They absolutely do, and they should, since they've spent years and untold dollars, creating their identity. But no one should be fooled into thinking that the Restoration Part label, means anything other than the fact that the manufacturer of a part has paid a fee to GM, so that they could use a GM logo, likeness, etc.
All the GM licensed products I have bought for my car were much higher quality than the Chinese crap others sell. So...whats the problem?
Last edited by Torqued Off; 01-20-2017 at 07:19 PM.
#15
Team Owner
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Sitting in his Nowhere land Hanover Pa
Posts: 49,011
Received 6,944 Likes
on
4,783 Posts
2015 C2 of Year Finalist
#16
Le Mans Master
Member Since: May 2008
Posts: 8,970
Received 2,687 Likes
on
1,414 Posts
2022 C3 of the Year Finalist - Modified
#17
Team Owner
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Sitting in his Nowhere land Hanover Pa
Posts: 49,011
Received 6,944 Likes
on
4,783 Posts
2015 C2 of Year Finalist
Last edited by Nowhere Man; 01-21-2017 at 09:30 AM.
#18
Race Director
Yes, GM does have a right to protect their products and they should. I don't hold that against them at all, and in fact I am proud they do.
All the GM licensed products I have bought for my car were much higher quality than the Chinese crap others sell. So...whats the problem?
All the GM licensed products I have bought for my car were much higher quality than the Chinese crap others sell. So...whats the problem?
And I do fully agree that GM has every right to protect their trademarks, and they absolutely should. I made that point in my post.
As far as what you call "Chinese crap", many of the licensed Corvette vendors on the list, are having parts made overseas. AAC (Corvette America), Ecklers, Vette Masters, Lonestar, etc are all manufacturing parts in China, India, Korea, etc. Many of the non Corvette companies, on the list, make parts overseas too. I'm in the parts business, I know who makes most of the repro parts, and where they are made. I sell a lot of "GM Restoration Parts" labelled items.
Where a part is made, and whether or not it is licensed, has very little to do with the quality of the part. The quality is dependent on how much effort the company having it made, is willing to put into having it made correctly. US companies that put enough pressure on their overseas manufacturers, and properly test their parts before approving them for production, manage to have high quality parts made overseas. Companies that cut corners, whether made here or overseas, make junk parts.
As Nowhere Man said, AC Delco is a wholly owned subsidiary of GM, and always has been. GM (and Delco) may be American, but fewer and fewer of their parts are made in the US. I buy quite a bit of Chevrolet and Delco parts. GM weatherstrip has been coming from Canada for over 20 years, and their electrical parts have been been made in Mexico, for almost as long. I've seen GM parts labelled China, Korea, Mexico, Canada, and an assortment of other countries.
#19
Race Director
Yes, GM does have a right to protect their products and they should. I don't hold that against them at all, and in fact I am proud they do.
All the GM licensed products I have bought for my car were much higher quality than the Chinese crap others sell. So...whats the problem?
All the GM licensed products I have bought for my car were much higher quality than the Chinese crap others sell. So...whats the problem?
#20
Le Mans Master
Member Since: May 2008
Posts: 8,970
Received 2,687 Likes
on
1,414 Posts
2022 C3 of the Year Finalist - Modified
Look, I am not naïve to think that all GM parts are made in the USA. We have given away manufacturing jobs to foreign countries for a long time...unfortunately. Front forks on all Harley Davison motorcycles have been made in Japan since 1977. That doesn't mean I like it, and if I had a choice I would buy the American forks....but they don't exist.
Quality is quality. I prefer buying American made products, and there are lots of quality American product out there. I personally believe we could make the highest quality products in the world if we cared to do so. AND, I am old enough to remember that most parts made in China are junk, and still are....just go into Harbor Fr***t, its full of Chinese junk. Plenty of threads on this and other forums about the junk cylinder heads out there made in other countries.
My defense of GM and the comments made in this thread is trying to balance against statements made about "wanting people to know" that when GM licenses a product it means nothing more than someone paid for the license. What I do know is the GM licensed products I bought for my car, no matter where they were made, were all better quality than the other options out there. SO, that tells me that GM does set a standard for quality.....at least for the parts I bought! You all dispute that. But unless you have direct knowledge about the licensing process, its only your opinion. Facts are facts, opinions are opinions.
If I am guilty, or considered stupid, because I side with GM or any other American company over ANY foreign manufacturer, then I guess I am just deplorable. Not apologizing for it. Not embarrassed about it.
Quality is quality. I prefer buying American made products, and there are lots of quality American product out there. I personally believe we could make the highest quality products in the world if we cared to do so. AND, I am old enough to remember that most parts made in China are junk, and still are....just go into Harbor Fr***t, its full of Chinese junk. Plenty of threads on this and other forums about the junk cylinder heads out there made in other countries.
My defense of GM and the comments made in this thread is trying to balance against statements made about "wanting people to know" that when GM licenses a product it means nothing more than someone paid for the license. What I do know is the GM licensed products I bought for my car, no matter where they were made, were all better quality than the other options out there. SO, that tells me that GM does set a standard for quality.....at least for the parts I bought! You all dispute that. But unless you have direct knowledge about the licensing process, its only your opinion. Facts are facts, opinions are opinions.
If I am guilty, or considered stupid, because I side with GM or any other American company over ANY foreign manufacturer, then I guess I am just deplorable. Not apologizing for it. Not embarrassed about it.
Last edited by Torqued Off; 01-21-2017 at 07:05 PM.