Cadence vs ED






Any thoughts or comments would be appreciated, I tried to search but find no info on either...
Thanks in advance!
I can get pretty good deals on Cadence.... don't ask me how






Here is my criteria,
C6 Coupe
DLS 8.2's in the front
Eclipse 5.25's in the rear
JL Stealth Sub
Would prefer not to run a multi amp setup, not looking to rumble the people in the next block, want to hear music with the top off, want to listen to music with the top on...
Thanks!
P.S.
VinceC5, I guess I wont ask! (-: (but feel free to offer if you like!)
I'd really like to hear what the problems are, before I plunk the change down on the new Cadence 5 channel.
Last edited by Kale; Aug 6, 2007 at 11:33 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts




Last edited by DPG; Aug 7, 2007 at 09:41 AM.






I saw the same thing about the ED amp and the fact it's power output is rated at 12.5 too... That is pretty nice.
I am also open to any orther suggestions on 5 channel amps...
I would like 100 or better to the front, 50 minimum to the rear and 200 or better to the SUB...
With all the talk about openess or clairity, I have an older DENON 5 channel (4x40 1x80) and it's amazing how much cleaner / open it is vs' my Fosgate... I would like to have that in my car (sound 'type" not the amp)
Thanks to all!
It was my experience that the Cadence components were crap. Cadence was absolutely the bottom of the barrel compared to other components the shop had. Everything had noisy pots, cheap switches and poorly mounted barrier strips. Invariably, the Cadence stuff would come back for repair for issues like these. The amps were certainly cheap power in a small footprint, but at a cost. They had terrible control over drivers (poor damping factor), made nowhere near the power of some other similarly-rated amps, and IMO looked like hell (unless you're 19 years old and have a thing for neon and mirrors in your trunk, with 20" spinners on a 10 year-old rusting hulk). The stuff was garbage.
In the mean time, RF, PG and Alpine to some extent have certainly dropped from what I would consider quality components (the Best-Buy factor), and it's certainly possible that Cadence improved. However, looking at the ways they spec their amps, their prices and their sales pitch tells me that's unlikely. If ground-pounding is your thing, have at it. If you want quality and the best from good speakers, look elsewhere.
The bottom line was this: when a customer dropped the $ for a moderately expensive install, it was embarrassing when the car came back because an amp failed. This became routine with Cadence. The shop ended up only selling them off the shelf to kids who knew what they wanted before they walked in the door and planned on self-installs. Anyone who was paying for a nice clean install with above-average components got the PG or RF amps because they sounded very good and we could count on them.
The way they spec their amps on their website should be a big red flag.




I saw the same thing about the ED amp and the fact it's power output is rated at 12.5 too... That is pretty nice.
I am also open to any orther suggestions on 5 channel amps...
I would like 100 or better to the front, 50 minimum to the rear and 200 or better to the SUB...
With all the talk about openess or clairity, I have an older DENON 5 channel (4x40 1x80) and it's amazing how much cleaner / open it is vs' my Fosgate... I would like to have that in my car (sound 'type" not the amp)
Thanks to all!
eD is big on sq with all their equipment, so you can't really go wrong with them. It meets all your requirements too.
interesting about cadenece. It's good to hear reviews from more than one source and wonder how they are now.




I got burned hard by their initial series of sound deadener. Apparently you had to call to find out it was worthless, and if you just went by the websites information, then you didn't do enough research (EDs own words to me, when I complained that their deadener sucked.)
though like I said, recently, they've really turned around. Their new deadener doesn't suck (its butyl, but the backing material does suck) and their customer service is much improved.




I got burned hard by their initial series of sound deadener. Apparently you had to call to find out it was worthless, and if you just went by the websites information, then you didn't do enough research (EDs own words to me, when I complained that their deadener sucked.)
though like I said, recently, they've really turned around. Their new deadener doesn't suck (its butyl, but the backing material does suck) and their customer service is much improved.
Yea from what I hear they have really turned things around. I've just started using them withing the past year, so I can't comment much on before that and what went on. What kind of problems have you had with the new backings? I've put it in a bunch of cars recently and haven't had any problems. Sorry you had problems with em










