Speakers

Last edited by weezon; May 26, 2020 at 09:18 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I'll try to answer your original question

Perception is very subjective and, therefore, it is centered on personal preferences. What doesn't change, however, is that when upgrading speakers, for the results to be felt as rewarding, quality sound has to go hand-in-hand with loudness.
Having said that, I must add that I haven't been able to compare them in an audition, but I could try to venture an educated guess
:- Polk Audio DB Series 2-way car speakers:
- Silk dome tweeter
- Mineral-filled, polymer/mica composite, cone woofer
- Butyl rubber surround
- Impedance: 4 ohms.
- DB351 (3½")
- Sensitivity: 91 db
- Frequency Response: 90Hz-22kHz
- DB521 (5¼")
- Sensitivity: 93 db
- Frequency Response: 60Hz-22kHz
- DB651 (6½")
- Sensitivity: 92 db
- Frequency Response: 40Hz-22kHz
- JBL GX Series 2-way car speakers:
- Soft dome mylar tweeter
- Polypropylene cone woofer
- Rubber surround
- Impedance: 2.3 ohms.
- GX302 (3½")
- Sensitivity: 89 dB
- Frequency Response: 90Hz-21kHz
- GX502 (5¼")
- Sensitivity: 91dB
- Frequency Response: 65Hz-21kHz
- GX602 (6½")
- Sensitivity: 92 dB
- Frequency Response: 50Hz-21kHz
Even though manufacturers tend to play with their specs, it seems reasonable to say that they're both high quality 2-way coaxials with very similar design and construction, so their sound shouldn't be dramatically different.
That leaves us with the loudness aspect. When available power is at a premium, replacement speakers not only need to be well designed, but they need to be able to extract the maximum possible power from the headunit's amp, while also having good sensitivity. Otherwise the perceived results tend to be unsatisfying.
The JBL GX Series has a 2.3 Ohms impedance, whereas the Polk Audio DB Series impedance is 4 Ohms. Since P = U² / R, that means that the JBLs can extract twice the power than the Polk Audios from the headunit's amp (the OEM headunit can handle this with no problems - plenty of installations around that have withstood the test of time). This translates to a 3db increase of available power.
On the other hand the JBLs 3½" and 5¼" speakers have a sensitivity that's 2db lower than the corresponding Polk Audios. That means that they would need 1.58 more power than the Polk Audios to play at the same level.
All this almost balances out the loudness aspect: the JBLs can extract 3db more power, but at the same time would need 2db more power to play at the same level than the Polk Audios. That leaves them with an advantage of 1db, which translates to the equivalent of having 1.26 more amp-power available.
The OEM headunit's built-in 4-channel amp is about 18 watt rms/ch (72 watts RMS total), so a 26% increase (1db) would be 22.68 watt rms/ch for a total of 90.72 watts RMS, but that is not enough to tip the scale in favor of the JBLs: it's there, but you really wouldn't notice the difference. To barely notice a difference, it would need to be at least 3db, while most listeners would need 5db.
So, in the end, unless you go and audition the JBLs and decide that that was the sound you were really looking for, I would say keep your Polk Audios and continue to enjoy them!

NOTE: Adding an external multi-channel amp has the potential to take you to a whole new level, but to really make it noticeable beyond the nuances that an audiophile installation can unveil (and let's not forget that this is a car, not a dedicated listening room), you would want to be able to perceive at least twice the loudness than before. For that to happen, it would take a 10db increase, which translates to 10 times more power than what you currently have. That would give you a target of at least 180 watts rms/ch, with a total of 720 watts RMS for a 4-channel amp, just for your 4 main channels. You would also need an interface adapter, like the PAC AOEM-VET1.
I'll try to answer your original question

Perception is very subjective and, therefore, it is centered on personal preferences. What doesn't change, however, is that when upgrading speakers, for the results to be felt as rewarding, quality sound has to go hand-in-hand with loudness.
Having said that, I must add that I haven't been able to compare them in an audition, but I could try to venture an educated guess
:- Polk Audio DB Series 2-way car speakers:
- Silk dome tweeter
- Mineral-filled, polymer/mica composite, cone woofer
- Butyl rubber surround
- Impedance: 4 ohms.
- DB351 (3½")
- Sensitivity: 91 db
- Frequency Response: 90Hz-22kHz
- DB521 (5¼")
- Sensitivity: 93 db
- Frequency Response: 60Hz-22kHz
- DB651 (6½")
- Sensitivity: 92 db
- Frequency Response: 40Hz-22kHz
- JBL GX Series 2-way car speakers:
- Soft dome mylar tweeter
- Polypropylene cone woofer
- Rubber surround
- Impedance: 2.3 ohms.
- GX302 (3½")
- Sensitivity: 89 dB
- Frequency Response: 90Hz-21kHz
- GX502 (5¼")
- Sensitivity: 91dB
- Frequency Response: 65Hz-21kHz
- GX602 (6½")
- Sensitivity: 92 dB
- Frequency Response: 50Hz-21kHz
Even though manufacturers tend to play with their specs, it seems reasonable to say that they're both high quality 2-way coaxials with very similar design and construction, so their sound shouldn't be dramatically different.
That leaves us with the loudness aspect. When available power is at a premium, replacement speakers not only need to be well designed, but they need to be able to extract the maximum possible power from the headunit's amp, while also having good sensitivity. Otherwise the perceived results tend to be unsatisfying.
The JBL GX Series has a 2.3 Ohms impedance, whereas the Polk Audio DB Series impedance is 4 Ohms. Since P = U² / R, that means that the JBLs can extract twice the power than the Polk Audios from the headunit's amp (the OEM headunit can handle this with no problems - plenty of installations around that have withstood the test of time). This translates to a 3db increase of available power.
On the other hand the JBLs 3½" and 5¼" speakers have a sensitivity that's 2db lower than the corresponding Polk Audios. That means that they would need 1.58 more power than the Polk Audios to play at the same level.
All this almost balances out the loudness aspect: the JBLs can extract 3db more power, but at the same time would need 2db more power to play at the same level than the Polk Audios. That leaves them with an advantage of 1db, which translates to the equivalent of having 1.26 more amp-power available.
The OEM headunit's built-in 4-channel amp is about 18 watt rms/ch (72 watts RMS total), so a 26% increase (1db) would be 22.68 watt rms/ch for a total of 90.72 watts RMS, but that is not enough to tip the scale in favor of the JBLs: it's there, but you really wouldn't notice the difference. To barely notice a difference, it would need to be at least 3db, while most listeners would need 5db.
So, in the end, unless you go and audition the JBLs and decide that that was the sound you were really looking for, I would say keep your Polk Audios and continue to enjoy them!

NOTE: Adding an external multi-channel amp has the potential to take you to a whole new level, but to really make it noticeable beyond the nuances that an audiophile installation can unveil (and let's not forget that this is a car, not a dedicated listening room), you would want to be able to perceive at least twice the loudness than before. For that to happen, it would take a 10db increase, which translates to 10 times more power than what you currently have. That would give you a target of at least 180 watts rms/ch, with a total of 720 watts RMS for a 4-channel amp, just for your 4 main channels. You would also need an interface adapter, like the PAC AOEM-VET1.
Wow , that is a very thorough comparison , I would like to thank you for taking the time to break it all down for me. Let me ask , I see you are also in Miami , are you an installer that I can go by your place? I’m thinking of going with the amp and also a sub and would like your assistance.














