c6 ZO6 rotors
#2
Drifting
#3
Melting Slicks
It doesn't matter much...
The reason they used the same rotor on each side is that it really doesn't matter much....
One of the key reasons for "sweep" in the vane shape is to avoid distortion, warpage and high stress that would result from a purely "radial" vane shape... To put it another way, if the vanes were purely radial they would create a lot of stress, because the vane would be much cooler than the outer surfaces, and that would lead to warpage. By "sweeping" the vanes they avoid that warpage that would cause pedal pulsation...
At 100 mph the fronts are turning only turning 1360 rpm, (this is a tip speed of about 70 feet/second, or about 1/20 of the speed of good compressor) any mostly radial vane is going to perform pretty much the same at that low a speed. In fact, the "sweep" in the properly turning vane actually lowers the effective tip speed of the rotor and it will tend to pump less air than a purely radial vane. The rotor running backward has a tip incidence issue, but that not that big a deal at this low a speed.
If you want to promote airflow thru the disk (and cool the brakes) you really need to add a set of spindle ducts and ram the air thru the brakes. Relying on the air pumping action of the brakes isn't really going to do it for a car with this much power.
One of the key reasons for "sweep" in the vane shape is to avoid distortion, warpage and high stress that would result from a purely "radial" vane shape... To put it another way, if the vanes were purely radial they would create a lot of stress, because the vane would be much cooler than the outer surfaces, and that would lead to warpage. By "sweeping" the vanes they avoid that warpage that would cause pedal pulsation...
At 100 mph the fronts are turning only turning 1360 rpm, (this is a tip speed of about 70 feet/second, or about 1/20 of the speed of good compressor) any mostly radial vane is going to perform pretty much the same at that low a speed. In fact, the "sweep" in the properly turning vane actually lowers the effective tip speed of the rotor and it will tend to pump less air than a purely radial vane. The rotor running backward has a tip incidence issue, but that not that big a deal at this low a speed.
If you want to promote airflow thru the disk (and cool the brakes) you really need to add a set of spindle ducts and ram the air thru the brakes. Relying on the air pumping action of the brakes isn't really going to do it for a car with this much power.
#5
Race Director
Solofast, while I agree with you in principle, the car comes with ductwork that is just BEGGING to have spindle ducts (or at least flex hose) added. Regardless of that however, the truly huge mistake is the drilling. Our rotors cracked at Roebling last weekend, and I now happily have RB rotors on the car.
With the properly vaned rotors, I've added ducts and new pads, and anticipate these rotors lasting much longer than the OEM swiss cheesers.
RB has front and rear rotors available, and Stoptech has fronts only. I am a dealer for both. Tire Rack also has 1-pc replacement rotors available, but haven't heared how they hold up yet. Should have lots to look at at the NCM VIR event next week, and we should all compare notes.
With the properly vaned rotors, I've added ducts and new pads, and anticipate these rotors lasting much longer than the OEM swiss cheesers.
RB has front and rear rotors available, and Stoptech has fronts only. I am a dealer for both. Tire Rack also has 1-pc replacement rotors available, but haven't heared how they hold up yet. Should have lots to look at at the NCM VIR event next week, and we should all compare notes.
#8
Drifting
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
*** With the wrong direction rotor the air is pumped the other way around, from the outside to the center. That means against the airflow coming from the air duct.
*** false, corrected as per GonzalesFJ
There are cooling reasons why performance brake rotors are not straight-vanes [SRV]:
"The total heat transfer from the SRV-R and DTDP passages is up to 20% greater than that for the SRV rotor"
[ From http://www.ingentaconnect.com/conten...ag39igk7.alice ]
Also a simpler article: http://www.forparts.com/techdir.rotor.htm
GM should be ashamed!
Last edited by TeddyFreddy; 06-28-2007 at 09:20 AM. Reason: Wrong statement
#9
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is not true. I cannot calculate now how much air is pumped by a rotor, but I say that even if the RPM is low, there is some air pumped from the center of the rotor to the outside.
With the wrong direction rotor the air is pumped the other way around, from the outside to the center. That means against the airflow coming from the air duct.
There are cooling reasons why performance brake rotors are not straight-vanes [SRV]:
"The total heat transfer from the SRV-R and DTDP passages is up to 20% greater than that for the SRV rotor"
[ From http://www.ingentaconnect.com/conten...ag39igk7.alice ]
Also a simpler article: http://www.forparts.com/techdir.rotor.htm
GM should be ashamed!
With the wrong direction rotor the air is pumped the other way around, from the outside to the center. That means against the airflow coming from the air duct.
There are cooling reasons why performance brake rotors are not straight-vanes [SRV]:
"The total heat transfer from the SRV-R and DTDP passages is up to 20% greater than that for the SRV rotor"
[ From http://www.ingentaconnect.com/conten...ag39igk7.alice ]
Also a simpler article: http://www.forparts.com/techdir.rotor.htm
GM should be ashamed!
The bolded statement above is not true. Pick any good mechanical engineering handbook and you will see centrifugal fans with the vanes pointing forward. The flow of air is ALWAYS from the center to the periphery of the fan.
Forward-facing vanes produce flow vs. backpressure curves that are desirable in certain applications.
All the hullabaloo about "wrong side rotors" is a tempest in a teapot. Rotor temps don't vary that much from "right" to "wrong" side, but many here don't understand the physics involved.
What is wrong with the OEM rotors are the @#$%^& holes. They are there just for bling -- because Porsche, Ferrari et al have them.
As soon as there are decently priced undrilled rotors, I will buy them. I'm not ready to drop $700 for a couple of front rotors.
YMMV,
#10
Drifting
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The bolded statement above is not true. Pick any good mechanical engineering handbook and you will see centrifugal fans with the vanes pointing forward. The flow of air is ALWAYS from the center to the periphery of the fan.
Forward-facing vanes produce flow vs. backpressure curves that are desirable in certain applications.
All the hullabaloo about "wrong side rotors" is a tempest in a teapot. Rotor temps don't vary that much from "right" to "wrong" side, but many here don't understand the physics involved.
What is wrong with the OEM rotors are the @#$%^& holes. They are there just for bling -- because Porsche, Ferrari et al have them.
As soon as there are decently priced undrilled rotors, I will buy them. I'm not ready to drop $700 for a couple of front rotors.
YMMV,
Forward-facing vanes produce flow vs. backpressure curves that are desirable in certain applications.
All the hullabaloo about "wrong side rotors" is a tempest in a teapot. Rotor temps don't vary that much from "right" to "wrong" side, but many here don't understand the physics involved.
What is wrong with the OEM rotors are the @#$%^& holes. They are there just for bling -- because Porsche, Ferrari et al have them.
As soon as there are decently priced undrilled rotors, I will buy them. I'm not ready to drop $700 for a couple of front rotors.
YMMV,
Backward-curved airfoil impellers provide the highest efficiencies for centrifugal fans.
So you are saying that GM did well providing same direction rotors?
Everybody in the performance brakes industry is wrong and GM is right?
I guess that StopTech got their patent for the AeroRotor design for nothing... http://www.stoptech.com/proven_technology/patents.shtml
Last edited by TeddyFreddy; 06-27-2007 at 08:25 PM.
#11
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My point, Teddy, is that the vane direction isn't as big a deal as some have indicated. Now the holes... that's a real problem.
Frank Gonzalez
Frank Gonzalez
#12
Safety Car
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: GA (some days)
Posts: 3,799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If a 90 degree temperature decrease is "bling", then I'll be glad to have some of that.
#13
Race Director
Porsches holes are CAST into the rotors, not drilled. However as a recent 996 Turbo owner, I can tell you they still crack AND cause uneven pad wear.
Give me a smooth or slotted rotor ANYDAY over a rotor with holes.
Back to the GM rotors, we did have a bunch of us driving the Z06 prior to the rotors cracking, BUT all of the cracks propagate from the holes, and there are no free-standing holes like you see in C5/C6 rotors.
Give me a smooth or slotted rotor ANYDAY over a rotor with holes.
Back to the GM rotors, we did have a bunch of us driving the Z06 prior to the rotors cracking, BUT all of the cracks propagate from the holes, and there are no free-standing holes like you see in C5/C6 rotors.
#14
Melting Slicks
The efficiency that you are referring to is the amount of air pumped at a given pressure ratio, versus the work put into the shaft. That is, how much power does it take to pump the air that goes thru the rotor. More aerodynamic efficiency just means less power is required to pump the air thru the brakes...
But since we are talking about less than 1/4 of a horsepower here, wether it is 1/3 or 1/4 of a horsepower it makes no practical difference.
The key parameter for cooling brakes is cooling flow for a given shaft speed. And backward curvature design (what the normal rotation is) is indeed more efficient, but it doesn't necessarily flow more air. In fact, generally, because of lower tip speed effects, it actually flows less air. A purely radial rotor would flow more than similar backward curved rotor, and potentially a forward curved design could flow even more, but there are a bunch of other issues that go into the design effects, so I don't want to generalize too much here.
Didn't want to be picky, but simply, efficiency has nothing to do with it.
#15
Drifting
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You are assuming that aerodynamic pumping efficiency has anything to do with cooling. I does not..
The efficiency that you are referring to is the amount of air pumped at a given pressure ratio, versus the work put into the shaft. That is, how much power does it take to pump the air that goes thru the rotor. More aerodynamic efficiency just means less power is required to pump the air thru the brakes...
But since we are talking about less than 1/4 of a horsepower here, wether it is 1/3 or 1/4 of a horsepower it makes no practical difference.
The key parameter for cooling brakes is cooling flow for a given shaft speed. And backward curvature design (what the normal rotation is) is indeed more efficient, but it doesn't necessarily flow more air. In fact, generally, because of lower tip speed effects, it actually flows less air. A purely radial rotor would flow more than similar backward curved rotor, and potentially a forward curved design could flow even more, but there are a bunch of other issues that go into the design effects, so I don't want to generalize too much here.
Didn't want to be picky, but simply, efficiency has nothing to do with it.
The efficiency that you are referring to is the amount of air pumped at a given pressure ratio, versus the work put into the shaft. That is, how much power does it take to pump the air that goes thru the rotor. More aerodynamic efficiency just means less power is required to pump the air thru the brakes...
But since we are talking about less than 1/4 of a horsepower here, wether it is 1/3 or 1/4 of a horsepower it makes no practical difference.
The key parameter for cooling brakes is cooling flow for a given shaft speed. And backward curvature design (what the normal rotation is) is indeed more efficient, but it doesn't necessarily flow more air. In fact, generally, because of lower tip speed effects, it actually flows less air. A purely radial rotor would flow more than similar backward curved rotor, and potentially a forward curved design could flow even more, but there are a bunch of other issues that go into the design effects, so I don't want to generalize too much here.
Didn't want to be picky, but simply, efficiency has nothing to do with it.
I am not a specialist in centrifugal compressors or brakes, I just tried to help based on information I have found.
#16
Safety Car
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: DFW This user does not support or recommend the product or service displayed in the ad to the right
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
DBA makes a reasonably priced one piece slotted only for the Z06.
http://www.buybrakes.com/store/DBA-42992SL
http://www.dba.com.au/2006/products_4000.asp
They also make a pricier 2 piece design
http://www.buybrakes.com/store/DBA-52992SR
http://www.dba.com.au/2006/products_5000.asp
I don't have any experience with them but, seems to be nice quality pieces.
They use what they call the "kangaroo paw" design.
http://www.dba.com.au/2006/videoclip.asp
http://www.buybrakes.com/store/DBA-42992SL
http://www.dba.com.au/2006/products_4000.asp
They also make a pricier 2 piece design
http://www.buybrakes.com/store/DBA-52992SR
http://www.dba.com.au/2006/products_5000.asp
I don't have any experience with them but, seems to be nice quality pieces.
They use what they call the "kangaroo paw" design.
http://www.dba.com.au/2006/videoclip.asp
Last edited by C6400hp; 06-28-2007 at 09:06 PM.
#17
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Kennesaw Georgia
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for posting the DBA info.
Late last year... when I was looking for Z06 rotors... they only offered the two piece rotors at a much higher price. Glad to see prices are lower... and a wider selection.
I think they are a supplier to the Australian brake mfg'r who supplies GM.
Late last year... when I was looking for Z06 rotors... they only offered the two piece rotors at a much higher price. Glad to see prices are lower... and a wider selection.
I think they are a supplier to the Australian brake mfg'r who supplies GM.
#18
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: If you don't weigh in you don't wrestle Road America
Posts: 3,031
Likes: 0
Received 73 Likes
on
54 Posts
FYI
The tire rack also offers the dba rotors, chances are theres a tirerack about a day away from you.
http://www.tirerack.com/brakes/resul...ategory=Rotors
The tire rack also offers the dba rotors, chances are theres a tirerack about a day away from you.
http://www.tirerack.com/brakes/resul...ategory=Rotors
#19
Melting Slicks
Have a few small cracks around the holes after 5 events (3-4 hrs seat time each event--Thanx Chin). I can barely put a fingernail (doesn't sink in) in them and they do not connect to the other holes. But I want to have an extra set of rotors to bring to Sebring in a couple of weeks. I suppose these rotors have to be bedded to my dtc 70 pads
#20
Burning Brakes
After two hard track events I decided to change the front rotors because the cracks were connecting hole to hole. When we took them off it was visually easy to distinguish right from left. The right side had noticeably larger cracks. I realize a one rat study does not absolutely prove the vane direction does makes a difference. Has anyone else noticed larger cracks on a specific side?
Dean
BTW I am trying the two piece Stoptech rotors with stock calipers. After three hard events they have significant surface cracking (checking may be a more accurate description) but no problems to worry about yet.
Dean
BTW I am trying the two piece Stoptech rotors with stock calipers. After three hard events they have significant surface cracking (checking may be a more accurate description) but no problems to worry about yet.
Last edited by kentz06; 08-06-2007 at 10:27 PM.