When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I know of a 65 which is a matching# and has received a Bloomington gold certificate.The owner also has the CE replacement block in storage that was put in by a dealer under warranty.What are the ethics,since it passed the judges but is not original?Is there a great difference between a restamp and CE replacement in an ordinary mid year? [If there is such a thing]
65's weren't covered by the 5/50 warranty, and "CE" short blocks weren't manufactured until April, 1969. Bloomington Gold and NCRS Flight judging is based on whether a component "appears" to be original, not whether it IS original, so the re-stamped block in the car must have been well done to pass judging. It's "correct", not "original"; neither judging organization certifies that anything is "original", only that the car appeared to be in compliance with their judging standard on the day it was judged.
A "CE" block will get an 88-point deduction (out of the 613 allocated to the block) in NCRS Flight Judging for the pad stampings (assuming the block casting number and date are correct for the car). In Bloomington Gold judging, a "CE" block will lose all the block points, and will not be eligible for "Gold".
Functionally, no - but for someone who is a stickler for the appearance of originality or plans to have the car judged, it can be an issue. For the average buyer who isn't that concerned about component originality, probably wouldn't matter; very few 40-year-old Corvettes still have their "original" engines, and most folks understand that.
Go back a few days in the Forum. I started quite a discussion on restamping of blocks. Lots of views, even a few "attitudes". Our cars are a very unique collector car in that they are/were attainable to so many people and they truely are America's sports car. When a weathered and worn Vette is taken back to it's original newness, why shouldn't the restorer take the pride of recreating originality in every respect? Date codes were applied for various purposes. The fact remains they were there when built and should be as correctly replicated as reasonable during restoration. This thought applies to radiators, expansion tanks, Transmissions, so why not engine blocks? Good Luck with your project!
When I got my 65 396 about 17 years ago, it had a CE 396 from 1972. None of the major components block, heads, intake, were correct numbered or dated. Over the years I have aquired almost all of the parts to put the car back to "as deliverd". I decked the block both to true it and remove the original stamp. I toiled with the idea of restamping for a long time. Several factors went into my final decision. I never intend to submit my car for judging but I do want it to look original to the above average critic. My final decision was to not restamp it and leave the pad bare but I do feel that if someone else were going the other route of attaining Gold certification, I see nothing wrong with making the car appear as delivered by restamping. As to the financial issues of restamping, let the buyer beware.
I have no problem with folks doing a RESTAMP either - as long as they admit it to EVERYONE that it is a restamp and DO NOT attempt to make out like it is ORIGINAL! FRAUD IN MY MIND, if they attempt to claim a restamp is original - or, when they go to Bloomington or NCRS and they DO NOT STATE the block is not original
Personally, I believe MOST cars DO NOT have original blocks in them, and blocks should not be restamped. Just my personal opinion
But then, what about the guys with the original engine that had its pad wiped by machining ?
Should they be allowed to restamp?
That's the ORIGINAL motor, no?
In my humble opinion, there is no problem with restamping a block, ESPECIALLY if it is the original block. If the goal is to deceive, then it is unethical, plain and simple, but if it is to restore a car to "like original" it is fine by me. I am often surprised at the number of folks who believe that bringing a car back to it's original configuration (finding a correct block, heads, etc.) and then numbering them to match is a "crime" in their eyes. But then again, I wouldn't be surprised if the car they so covet (as in their own) has had exactly that performed somewhere in the past (before they owned it). Some people just need to chill out... [Flame Suit On]
I saw mdZ06vetter's car at Bloomington last year. If I am not mistaken from reports from other posts, he decided not to retamp his block, take the deduction, and forego the chance for Gold. My impression is that he is a man of conviction. Check out his retoration photos. Beautiful car!!, Rick.
I see no problem with stamping a correct casting #/dated block. This is all fun for me.. I am doing a body-off on my 67, and have spent tons of time finding parts to make it as correct, as I can get.. Alternator, regulator, heads, radiator cap, etc.. Its FUN!! My motor is correct casting and date as well as the pad having all the correct stampings. When I bought the car, I was more interested in the casting # and date than the front pad info. Changing a car from its original build to make a profit is the issue for me. I get a kick out of the posts that claim there are more BB cars out there than GM built. Thats the crime in our hobby. Restore is the key word...Kurt
I did pick a side - I said if folks are honest and state they are restamp, I have no problem - what I have a problem with is those folks who represent their restamps or ORIGINAL - that is FRAUD!
FYI - a car is original only once - when you change the spark plugs out, the plugs are no longer original! when you change tires, the tires are no longer original, etc. so, when you change the engine out, no matter if you RESTAMP, it is not the original engine/block - but folks do not state it up front, and that is what I have the problem with - I would venture to say that the MAJORITY of the so-called big blocks out there today have restamps and are FRAUDS!
Those of us with AARP cards remember the sole reason to shell out the extra bucks for th BB cars was mostly to beat the living **** out of them. Most did not survive too many trips above 6000 on a regular basis over a couple of years. So, draw your own conclusion!
I saw mdZ06vetter's car at Bloomington last year. If I am not mistaken from reports from other posts, he decided not to retamp his block, take the deduction, and forego the chance for Gold. My impression is that he is a man of conviction. Check out his retoration photos. Beautiful car!!, Rick.
Those of us with AARP cards remember the sole reason to shell out the extra bucks for th BB cars was mostly to beat the living **** out of them. Most did not survive too many trips above 6000 on a regular basis over a couple of years. So, draw your own conclusion!
yeah, we were all young once, and drove our cars hard, blew up engines, etc. - not just a 1950s thing, or a 1960s thing, or even a 1970s thing. It's also a 2005 thing at my house, try keeping up with me on my bike, or winning a stoplight war in my vette - in the blood.
and yes, your point about these cars (SHP SBs and BBs) getting driven hard and grenading the engine is pretty much one of the main reasons original engine cars command higher sales prices - rareity - which is queered by the counterfit originals.
p.s. mdz06vetter has my admiration, you can tell where I stand.
Mike and everyone else - thanks for your WAY TOO kind comments on LADY! I will admit, she is beuatiful, and can't wait for the weather to cooperate so I can get her and drive her! I know everytime I start her up and drive her, Zora and Larry are smiling!