When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I haven't had mine that long so I can not really comment on its' durability. I do remember the Chevy BB's were notorious for sucking in valves, but I am sure that today's technology solved that problem. The other problem that I seem to recall was the cam lobes going flat, and that some of the cams would "walk", again I think this problem was fixed years ago.
As for its' capability, mine revs like there is no tomorrow. I can easily pull it to the 6500 red line, and I am sure some internal mods were done, but I wouldn't know until I pull it apart, and that's not going to happen at the start of driving season.....
As delivered they can have oiling issues if you really buzz them. Removing the windage tray and making sure the oil pressure isn't too high usually resolves this. However autocrossing them can still be dodgy. And the rod bolts ain't the best. But if you're not abusing the thing it will be OK anyway.
The original valve springs failed very quickly, which gave them a bad reputation for dropping valves; proper replacement springs will eliminate that problem.
I've owned two 396's over the years, they are the best big blocks in a corvette. Unlike the 427's *( I've owned 6 ) they do not overheat, and they rev alot higher than the 427's.
I've owned two 396's over the years, they are the best big blocks in a corvette. Unlike the 427's *( I've owned 6 ) they do not overheat, and they rev alot higher than the 427's.
I've never heard this before. I can understand why a 396 (with its smaller bore) might be less prone to overheating, but why would it rev higher than a 427? Both engines shared the same stroke and valvetrain. Are you saying it's due to lighter piston weight?
I owned both 396/375's and 427/550's and both were great motors. The 396's were close to stock, so I didn't rev much past 6,000 the 427's were L88 cloans + and were reved to 7,500. They were the most fun I ever had coming out of the hole and smoking anything that was next to me. Then contining to pull away with all that HP at the top end.
By the way I broke a lot a of drive trains in Nova's and mid "A Bodies" before getting it right.
I do not remember which year, but when GM went with the higher spring rate double spring all spring problems went away. If I remember correctly it was very early in the 396 life and the problem was very apparent on the low HP versions not used in the Vette. I do not remember the high HP 427 ever having the problem, only problem was the 2 bolt bottom end letting go if the revs got high.
I've owned two 396's over the years... Unlike the 427's *( I've owned 6 ) they do not overheat, and they rev alot higher than the 427's.
Don't forget that the 396's were the only BB's to come from the factory with aluminum radiators (other than the L-88s). From what I understand, you gain something like 30% more cooling capacity with aluminum. That'll make a big difference in keeping 'er cool.
Is there a way to verify if things such as the valve springs upgrade have been done? Without, or if verification can't be made, what things would a person want to do from the git go?
The 1965 396/425 L78 is the same identical engine as used in the 396/375 Camaros starting in 1967 through 1969. With the proper OEM cooling systems there have never been overheating issues in any of the BB`s in all configurations from mild OEM to wild OEM including {ZL1, L88, and the LS7`s}