C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

Just saw the new Ford Mustang Shelby GT 500 ad...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-2006, 03:11 PM
  #1  
achapman
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
achapman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2001
Location: Marblehead MA
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default Just saw the new Ford Mustang Shelby GT 500 ad...

The new Ford Mustang is claimed to have 500 hp..... according to the ad...... Still it looks like that car can haul some butt.... I hope not as fast as the Z06.... but we'll see.....
Old 09-18-2006, 03:35 PM
  #2  
Dicecal
Melting Slicks
 
Dicecal's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2001
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 2,846
Received 40 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by achapman
The new Ford Mustang is claimed to have 500 hp..... according to the ad...... Still it looks like that car can haul some butt.... I hope not as fast as the Z06.... but we'll see.....
Too bad it weights 4000#'s.....in a recent car magazine it was not faster than a regular C6.
Old 09-18-2006, 04:27 PM
  #3  
Mecom Racer
Burning Brakes
 
Mecom Racer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2002
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dicecal
Too bad it weights 4000#'s.....in a recent car magazine it was not faster than a regular C6.
Yea, the thing is a brick on wheels.
Old 09-18-2006, 04:43 PM
  #4  
achapman
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
achapman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2001
Location: Marblehead MA
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Wow, the Muskrat is 4000 lbs..... I thought the 1970's Mustangs were bloated, but even they did not weigh that much..... I remember at the time, reading an article on the Boss 429, and they said the car was so front heavy that the rear could never "hook up", but if it ever did.......

I can remember when the 84 Thunderchicken was first introduced with its new styling theme and because it was overweight the Thunderbird Manager was canned..... I guess this time there gonna axe 10K......

More hard times ahead for GM and Ford......
Old 09-18-2006, 04:54 PM
  #5  
lovevettes
Racer
 
lovevettes's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Mustang

Was getting my hair cut - noticed a Road and Track magazine , read the whole article comparing the 400 H.P. Corvette[ with all the options , which the mag. didnt want in the car] the Mustang had 500
H.P. , the Corvette beat it just about every test , quarter mile , cornering ,etc. But to be fair , this wasn't comparing apples to apples
the Corvette has far better weight distribution and traction, and probably a better lower center of gravity. The only thing going for the mustang was the horsepower. When the new Camaro comes out and when they test it with the Mustang that will be comparing apples to apples. Getting back to the Corvette , I cant understand why any body would not want one, for the price , it is the best bargain.
Old 09-18-2006, 11:49 PM
  #6  
GTS34
Instructor
 
GTS34's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Howell NJ
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The best 1/4 mile time I have seen so far was 12.2 in Muscle Mustang & Fast Fords (Bone Stock).

They are heavy but with just a tune and a cold air kit (open air filter) they put down 505 rear wheel horsepower on the dyno (430-440 rwhp stock). Not bad for a $42K car with $500 worth of parts. Put on a smaller blower pulley or aftermarket twin screw supercharger (Kenne Bell or Whipple), Long Tube Headers, etc and you'll be looking at approx 600-700 rear wheel horsepower in a car that can be your daily driver with A/C and run the quarter mile in the 10's.

All the reports of the new Camaro and Challenger suggest they will both be in the 3,900 - 4,100 lb weight range too.

Last edited by GTS34; 09-18-2006 at 11:57 PM.
Old 09-18-2006, 11:55 PM
  #7  
Army Vette
Racer
 
Army Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 333
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Very good show on Motor Week on PBS last week.
Car looks very good, but the interior is pretty simple.
Great power, but the C6 still takes it even w/ 100 less HP.
Old 09-19-2006, 12:31 AM
  #8  
Johns_65Vette
Burning Brakes
 
Johns_65Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Horsetown USA (Norco) Kaleeforkneeah
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GTS34
The best 1/4 mile time I have seen so far was 12.2 in Muscle Mustang & Fast Fords (Bone Stock).

They are heavy but with just a tune and a cold air kit (open air filter) they put down 505 rear wheel horsepower on the dyno (430-440 rwhp stock). Not bad for a $42K car with $500 worth of parts. Put on a smaller blower pulley or aftermarket twin screw supercharger (Kenne Bell or Whipple), Long Tube Headers, etc and you'll be looking at approx 600-700 rear wheel horsepower in a car that can be your daily driver with A/C and run the quarter mile in the 10's.

All the reports of the new Camaro and Challenger suggest they will both be in the 3,900 - 4,100 lb weight range too.
Till the trans goes BOOM!!
Old 09-19-2006, 08:44 AM
  #9  
GTS34
Instructor
 
GTS34's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Howell NJ
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Johns_65Vette
Till the trans goes BOOM!!
Actually the weakest link in the drivetrain will probably be the connecting rods. Unfortunately they stopped using the Manley Forged H-Beam Rods that came in the 03-04 Cobra's. With the Cracked Forged Steel I-Beam rods, 600-700hp is pushing the limit of the rods.

Get notified of new replies

To Just saw the new Ford Mustang Shelby GT 500 ad...




Quick Reply: Just saw the new Ford Mustang Shelby GT 500 ad...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:29 AM.