When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
hi, i am just starting body off frame rebuild (64 coupe) the car is not stock and this is not a restoration. what are the advantages, disadvantages of poly bushings vs rubber bushings for suspension?? for body mounts?? im just starting to assemble the giant pile of misc. parts i will need for a complete chassis rebuild. thanks
hi, i am just starting body off frame rebuild (64 coupe) the car is not stock and this is not a restoration. what are the advantages, disadvantages of poly bushings vs rubber bushings for suspension?? for body mounts?? im just starting to assemble the giant pile of misc. parts i will need for a complete chassis rebuild. thanks
Poly bushes will transmit a bit more road vibration, noise, thumps etc, but will tighten up suspension under hard braking or sharp direction changes. I tend to put poly bushes in joints that do alot of hard work, eg lower rear struts, sway bar etc.
As for body mounts - stick with rubber. They are not particularly stressed and the originals lasted for 40 yrs.
I hear some poly bushings end up sqeaking...Rubber lasts about 30+ years...how long will you be driving it???
Poly only squeaks if it's old (materials technology has moved on) and/or not greased properly. As an example, I had the same set of poly suspension bushings in two different Eagle Talons over the course of a decade and never heard one tiny squeak. Same goes for the front sway bar bushings on my 77.
Rubber only lasts 30 years if it's extremely coddled and you're lucky. The rubber bushings on my 2000 Cherokee are already decaying.
I had my 65 aligned and i mentioned that I was going to replace the front springs and buy a complete poly front end rebuild kit. The shop owner and the mechanic both told me that I would be better off staying with rubber. He did say if I had to use poly,use it on the sway bar bushings. Since I drive less than 2k miles a year,only in good weather,and the fact my vette is garage kept,I figured the rubber should last at least 20 years...... I went with the rubber.
I installed poly graphite bushings and have no squeaks what so ever.
I installed them in front suspension, trailing arms, etc, except the body mounts, which I replaced with rubber mounts.
I've had other C2 owners drive the car, and everyone has commented how well it handles, and how quite it is.
In addition I used a product called dum-dum, its a clay like product that is tacky. I used it throughout the entire interior. As example where the dash attaches to the body, where the cluster attached to the dash, glove box to the dash, another words any where I thought a squeak might come from I used the material. So far no squeaks.
No complaints in this area of the rebuild.
Dennis
Last edited by OCS1667; Oct 9, 2007 at 01:57 AM.
Reason: spelling
Poly bushes will transmit a bit more road vibration, noise, thumps etc, but will tighten up suspension under hard braking or sharp direction changes. I tend to put poly bushes in joints that do alot of hard work, eg lower rear struts, sway bar etc.
As for body mounts - stick with rubber. They are not particularly stressed and the originals lasted for 40 yrs.
Cheers
Neville
I agree!
I have poly on the sway bar bushings, link ends and the rear spring link pads.
Poly only squeaks if it's old (materials technology has moved on) and/or not greased properly. As an example, I had the same set of poly suspension bushings in two different Eagle Talons over the course of a decade and never heard one tiny squeak. Same goes for the front sway bar bushings on my 77.
Rubber only lasts 30 years if it's extremely coddled and you're lucky. The rubber bushings on my 2000 Cherokee are already decaying.
I agree the rubber bushings on my 92 K5 Blazer are going, but it has sat outside its entire life, and has 260K miles on it.
I think most of our cars live in heated garages, no rain or "drive through" car washes and we diligently wipe extra grease and oil away.
Mark
Last edited by ghostrider20; Oct 11, 2007 at 02:51 PM.
And I have no idea why. Switching to poly, in my experience, is a night-and-day improvement in handling.
Are you comparing old, worn out rubber to new poly? Given that the defection of the poly parts may be less than rubber, deflection of the frame would be orders of magnitude larger. The stiffer joints may transmit road feel better but as for improved handling.I don't know the answer, are there any A B tests on the track or skid pad?
Are you comparing old, worn out rubber to new poly? Given that the defection of the poly parts may be less than rubber, deflection of the frame would be orders of magnitude larger. The stiffer joints may transmit road feel better but as for improved handling.I don't know the answer, are there any A B tests on the track or skid pad?
Nope. On the Talon, the rubber bushings were still OK when I swapped them out. Big difference.
Sometime back (try a search) someone mentioned advantages of both, primarily, he was recommending one for cruising and the other for touring?? It was an informative post that made a great deal of sense.
I use poly eng and tranny mounts. Rubber everywhere else. I've found some poly parts were not the correct dimension and were either under or over size. Diff mounts and tranny mounts were some of them.
I use poly eng and tranny mounts. Rubber everywhere else. I've found some poly parts were not the correct dimension and were either under or over size. Diff mounts and tranny mounts were some of them.
When I did my body-off project last winter, I did the same. I am pleased with the handling and ride, plus there are no squeaks.
Roy
I use poly eng and tranny mounts. Rubber everywhere else. I've found some poly parts were not the correct dimension and were either under or over size. Diff mounts and tranny mounts were some of them.
I think I figured out the issue with ES's transmission mount - it seems to fit fine without the exhaust support plate. Was Corvette unique in using that bracket?
Originally Posted by 67-427ci
When I did my body-off project last winter, I did the same. I am pleased with the handling and ride, plus there are no squeaks.
Roy
[QUOTE=I'm Batman;1562262522]I think I figured out the issue with ES's transmission mount - it seems to fit fine without the exhaust support plate. Was Corvette unique in using that bracket?
That particular tranny mount was 1/4" off. I contacted their engineering dept 3 years ago about it. I was told the mount would not fit corvette yet they never changed any of the catalog references to reflect that, - at least the last time I checked. Even purchased a eng and tranny kit from Summit about 2 years ago and still had the wrong tranny mount in it.
I found Prothane makes/made a poly tranny mount that was very close to the rubber size. It works.
I only switched to them on the engine mounts to eliminate the common rubber mount shearing. The poly Diff mounts were off enough to cause the banging associated with worn out rubber mounts. Not sure if all suppliers on these have the same problem?
That particular tranny mount was 1/4" off. I contacted their engineering dept 3 years ago about it. I was told the mount would not fit corvette yet they never changed any of the catalog references to reflect that, - at least the last time I checked. Even purchased a eng and tranny kit from Summit about 2 years ago and still had the wrong tranny mount in it.
I picked up an E/S C3 kit from eBay - the mount in it was only a small bit taller than the original rubber piece - the difference was about the same thickness as the exhaust bracket, which is a pretty danged thick piece of metal. I'll check it again if it gives me any trouble.