C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

Using French Locks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 10:34 AM
  #1  
rubbinisracing's Avatar
rubbinisracing
Thread Starter
Intermediate
15 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Southlake Texas
Default Using French Locks

I need some advice from the experts.....I'm installing the half shafts to the rear diff. and trailing arms. There are 2 frenck locks on each half shaft flange with a pair of bolts running thru each to attach the flange to the trailing arm. According to the shop manual the bolts are to be torqued to 70-90 ftlbs, when I torgue them in this range it just rips the frenck lock apart. There are no washers underneath the bolts to provide a slip/bearing surface and there is not enough clearance for an SAE flat washer. I think I can keep the lock from tearing apart by lubing the side of the lock where the bolt head bears against it and using less torque on the bolt but I'm not sure this is advisable. The car is a 63 and uses the locks pictured below.



Any suggestions would be appreciated!
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 10:40 AM
  #2  
Hitch's Avatar
Hitch
Race Director
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 11,593
Likes: 173
From: Clayton NC
Default

I've done just as you are planning to, put a little bit of antiseize on the bolt head and it should help. I say help because it will still want to rotate the french lock and destroy it. Dave
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 11:49 AM
  #3  
67vetteal's Avatar
67vetteal
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 101
From: Riverhead New York
Default

Any bolt that requires a Torque to Specification should have the Threads cleaned by Wire Brush or Wheel and then be well Lubricated with an appropriate material. By this I mean sometimes an light Oil, other times a Lubricant Sealer such as Teflon. Other times a grease is a better choice. As to your French Locks, try a drop or two of engine assembly Lubricant. And remember, only one Tab needs to be engaged completely. Al W.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 04:29 PM
  #4  
rubbinisracing's Avatar
rubbinisracing
Thread Starter
Intermediate
15 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Southlake Texas
Default

Originally Posted by 67vetteal
Any bolt that requires a Torque to Specification should have the Threads cleaned by Wire Brush or Wheel and then be well Lubricated with an appropriate material. By this I mean sometimes an light Oil, other times a Lubricant Sealer such as Teflon. Other times a grease is a better choice. As to your French Locks, try a drop or two of engine assembly Lubricant. And remember, only one Tab needs to be engaged completely. Al W.
Thanks for thr reply Al W. But lubricating the threads before assembly is not proper. Most torque specs are given for "dry" installation, the only time it's acceptable is when the torque spec specifically mentions a specific lubricant and the corresponding torque. Each lubricant reduces friction differently and would change the corresponding spec. For a simple test you can tighten a new nut on a new bolt till failure and record the torque required and then lube another new bolt and nut and try the same. Big difference, as 95% of the torque is used to overcome friction and the remaining 5% is used to preload the fastener.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 04:42 PM
  #5  
66since71's Avatar
66since71
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 7
From: DFW
Default

If the photo is of the actual locks you are using, the problem may be the locks.

They should be relatively flat to start with, with only a raised boss on the section that spans the two holes. The one in your photo has that section (the one that spans the two holes) turned 90* to the mounting surface, and would account for the tendency to turn as you turn the bolts.

Adding a flat washer, by the way, may limit thread engagement. A risky modification...

Last year I bought some correct locks from Paragon. Try their web site for a photo.

http://www.corvette-paragon.com/cata...4-A77725953DBA

I understand 63-64 was different, but these should work in any case as the GM parts book lists them as fitting 63 to 67.

Last edited by 66since71; Sep 4, 2007 at 04:54 PM. Reason: link to photo
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 04:50 PM
  #6  
Scott Marzahl's Avatar
Scott Marzahl
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,359
Likes: 428
From: Seattle Area WA
Default

I suggest only using the Stainless version of these locks or they will definately tear apart at around 60 pounds. I've found that anti sieze does help, but there is a night and day difference when you use the stainless ones from Paragon.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 05:27 PM
  #7  
Chuck Gongloff's Avatar
Chuck Gongloff
Race Director
Supporting Lifetime Gold
25 Year Member
Active Streak: 90 Days
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 5
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 10,866
Likes: 717
From: Beverly Hills/Pine Ridge Florida
Default

Originally Posted by 66since71
If the photo is of the actual locks you are using, the problem may be the locks.

They should be relatively flat to start with, with only a raised boss on the section that spans the two holes. The one in your photo has that section (the one that spans the two holes) turned 90* to the mounting surface, and would account for the tendency to turn as you turn the bolts.

Adding a flat washer, by the way, may limit thread engagement. A risky modification...

Last year I bought some correct locks from Paragon. Try their web site for a photo.

http://www.corvette-paragon.com/cata...4-A77725953DBA

I understand 63-64 was different, but these should work in any case as the GM parts book lists them as fitting 63 to 67.
That's the "correct" lock for mid to late 63's and 64's.

The style you describe is later.....65 and up.

Chuck
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 05:49 PM
  #8  
66since71's Avatar
66since71
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 7
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck Gongloff
That's the "correct" lock for mid to late 63's and 64's.

The style you describe is later.....65 and up.

Chuck
Thanks, that's what I suspected, Chuck. It is interesting though that GM serviced 63's and 64's with the later lock (P&A 30B). Either just out of convenience, or the newer lock actually fixed a problem (like this one?).
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 05:54 PM
  #9  
Chuck Gongloff's Avatar
Chuck Gongloff
Race Director
Supporting Lifetime Gold
25 Year Member
Active Streak: 90 Days
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 5
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 10,866
Likes: 717
From: Beverly Hills/Pine Ridge Florida
Default

Originally Posted by 66since71
Thanks, that's what I suspected, Chuck. It is interesting though that GM serviced 63's and 64's with the later lock (P&A 30B). Either just out of convenience, or the newer lock actually fixed a problem (like this one?).
Dunno for sure.

The "late" style was sold as a service replacement for 63 and 64.

BTW, EARLY 63's didn't use the locks at all.

I suppose the change was to prevent "twisting", although I've crunched and twised a few of the later style too.

Chuck
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 06:01 PM
  #10  
67vetteal's Avatar
67vetteal
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 101
From: Riverhead New York
Default

Originally Posted by rubbinisracing
Thanks for thr reply Al W. But lubricating the threads before assembly is not proper. Most torque specs are given for "dry" installation, the only time it's acceptable is when the torque spec specifically mentions a specific lubricant and the corresponding torque. Each lubricant reduces friction differently and would change the corresponding spec. For a simple test you can tighten a new nut on a new bolt till failure and record the torque required and then lube another new bolt and nut and try the same. Big difference, as 95% of the torque is used to overcome friction and the remaining 5% is used to preload the fastener.
Not to chase our Tails on this but, light oil is most times better than no oil. My reasoning is that Threads do Gaul and this will cause an incorrect Torque result. In this day of "Calibrated" wrenches I'd like to here more on our thoughts. JMHO Al W.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 06:52 PM
  #11  
67-427ci's Avatar
67-427ci
Melting Slicks
Supporting Lifetime
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,302
Likes: 26
From: Cave Creek AZ
Default

Check out this Bolt Torque Calculator. Select your bolt grade & size, coarse, fine or extra fine thread, click on "calculate" and it gives you the correct torque for dry, plated and lubricated threads. There is quite a difference between dry/clean threads & lubricated threads.
Roy
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 08:44 PM
  #12  
67vetteal's Avatar
67vetteal
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 101
From: Riverhead New York
Default

Interesting Thread! So, I stand corrected as to Dry VS Lubricated. But for all my assemblies I will continue to practice Due Diligence. I still feel more confident in a good tightening with a lubricated thread VS a dry one. Just me. Al W.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 10:03 PM
  #13  
geo65's Avatar
geo65
Racer
Supporting Lifetime
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 470
Likes: 2
From: Hunterdon County NJ
Default

sure wish i would have read this two nights ago..I used the Stainless and they twisted up at the torque limit. Some lubricant under the head may have saved them I believe...
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 10:03 PM
  #14  
ghostrider20's Avatar
ghostrider20
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,913
Likes: 283
Default

Originally Posted by 67vetteal
Interesting Thread! So, I stand corrected as to Dry VS Lubricated. But for all my assemblies I will continue to practice Due Diligence. I still feel more confident in a good tightening with a lubricated thread VS a dry one. Just me. Al W.
I agree. Unless the bolts and the holes are new, or in new condition, there is contamination from rust or corrosion. I try and chase all the threads and or use my round wire brush on the drill to clean threads. But they are still not new. I spray WD-40 on the threads or use the silver anti seize. The anti seize is used sparingly, as it seems to stain everything it touches, almost like paint.

Mark
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 11:12 PM
  #15  
rubbinisracing's Avatar
rubbinisracing
Thread Starter
Intermediate
15 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Southlake Texas
Default

Thanks for the advice.....I'm going to lube the washer face of the cap screw with "Tri-flow", in my past experiences with torque/tension relationships this lubricant is the slickest and should ease the friction significantly. I'll then torque the cap screw till the lock starts to twist and quit.

I'll report back in a week with results as I'm waiting on new locks from Paragon as I have already destroyed 2 I previously got from them.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Using French Locks





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:47 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE