When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Could someone explain the differences between self-aligning and non self-aligning rocker arms. Why do some people not recommend self-aligning rocker arms for use with solid lifters? Understand that GM has long ago discontinued service use of the non self-aligning type, and these were superseded by self-aligning for ALL applications.
Could someone explain the differences between self-aligning and non self-aligning rocker arms. Why do some people not recommend self-aligning rocker arms for use with solid lifters? Understand that GM has long ago discontinued service use of the non self-aligning type, and these were superseded by self-aligning for ALL applications.
Thanks in advance.
Joe
The later self-aligning rockers had a "rib" on each side of the valve stem contact surface to keep the rocker aligned with the tip of the valve. Not used with solid lifters, as excessive clearance could result in the valve contacting the rib instead of the flat area. Also, solid lifter engines after 1969 had pushrod guide plates, and you can't guide a rocker in two places. Photo below shows a standard rocker on the left and the later self-aligning rocker on the right.
The later self-aligning rockers had a "rib" on each side of the valve stem contact surface to keep the rocker aligned with the tip of the valve. Not used with solid lifters, as excessive clearance could result in the valve contacting the rib instead of the flat area. Also, solid lifter engines after 1969 had pushrod guide plates, and you can't guide a rocker in two places. Photo below shows a standard rocker on the left and the later self-aligning rocker on the right.
Thanks a million, John.
The picture tells me that mine are non self-aligning, as they should be.