C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

61 Charging system

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 15, 2008 | 03:47 PM
  #21  
kverges's Avatar
kverges
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 812
Likes: 42
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Thanks for all the help from all of you - amazingly prompt! Looks like the generator is the culprit. First thing I noticed was Field and Armature were reversed beween regulator and generator - hopefully that was not fatal to either component. The generator produces no voltage or current in any of the tests I have tried and I am informed the the prior owner that the regulatro was overhauled, but the generator has unknown history, so I figure it cannot hurt to throw brushes, etc at it. Hopefully that resolves the issue
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2008 | 05:33 PM
  #22  
L78racer's Avatar
L78racer
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 953
Likes: 27
Default

...and you didn't get an extra one for me...
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2008 | 05:57 PM
  #23  
1snake's Avatar
1snake
Le Mans Master
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,000
Likes: 659
From: Puget Sound
Default

Originally Posted by DZAUTO
The 3 5/8in pulley was std and the 4in was on some "hi-perf" engines.
AND, the 4in pulley also came on some truck generators. It is, or at least was ALMOST identical to the Vette 4in pulley.
[/IMG]

I'm not sure about about 1956 but the 58-62 Corvette 4" pulleys are different than the one shown in your pics. The pulley is spaced out from the fan 3/16". Is that the ALMOST you are referring to? The correct repo. 4" pulley is readily available.

Jim
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2008 | 06:05 PM
  #24  
L78racer's Avatar
L78racer
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 953
Likes: 27
Default

Originally Posted by kverges
Thanks for all the help from all of you - amazingly prompt! Looks like the generator is the culprit. First thing I noticed was Field and Armature were reversed beween regulator and generator - hopefully that was not fatal to either component. The generator produces no voltage or current in any of the tests I have tried and I am informed the the prior owner that the regulatro was overhauled, but the generator has unknown history, so I figure it cannot hurt to throw brushes, etc at it. Hopefully that resolves the issue
with the generator off the car you can test it.

you'll need a good battery, a set of jumper cables and another jumper wire.

jumper the field 'F' terminal to the generator case.
connect the negative battery cable to the generator case.
connect the positive cable to the armature 'A' terminal. (connect to the generator first then the battery).
the generator should run as a motor.
it should draw ~5 amps and run at ~900 rpm.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2008 | 06:54 PM
  #25  
John S 1961's Avatar
John S 1961
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,454
Likes: 315
From: Scottsdale AZ
Default generators, drum brakes and Points.....Archaic

The good guys who caveat generators as OK if "everything is working properly" Like drum brakes, are correct, but unfortunately these 50 year old cars dont often fall into that category. Alternators work REALLY well, (notice how they were installed starting in 1963 and disc brakes work REALLY Well, (notice they were installed in 1965) so my opinion is that you will have nothing but trouble when you least want it if you keep your generator, same for the drum brakes. If you want to drive and enjoy your car a few MID SIXTIES upgrades will serve you Well......Alternator....disc brakes.....electronic ignition. Then you will have reduced frequent failure points in your car! Drive....enjoy

See Madelectrical.com for electrical upgrades (check out the relays)
Engineered components for disc brakes
and get a HEI from whomever you like!

http://fototime.com/inv/DA6D990661BC04B
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2008 | 09:32 PM
  #26  
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,061
Likes: 7,146
Army
Default

Originally Posted by John S 1961
The good guys who caveat generators as OK if "everything is working properly" Like drum brakes, are correct, but unfortunately these 50 year old cars dont often fall into that category. Alternators work REALLY well, (notice how they were installed starting in 1963 and disc brakes work REALLY Well, (notice they were installed in 1965) so my opinion is that you will have nothing but trouble when you least want it if you keep your generator, same for the drum brakes. If you want to drive and enjoy your car a few MID SIXTIES upgrades will serve you Well......Alternator....disc brakes.....electronic ignition. Then you will have reduced frequent failure points in your car! Drive....enjoy

See Madelectrical.com for electrical upgrades (check out the relays)
Engineered components for disc brakes
and get a HEI from whomever you like!

http://fototime.com/inv/DA6D990661BC04B
Agree with disc brakes and electronic ignition (both items added to my '61); however my generator has had zero problems and I'm not messing with something that is working just fine and is NOT a safety issue.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 02:24 AM
  #27  
K2's Avatar
K2
Melting Slicks
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,743
Likes: 146
From: Chuckanut WA
Default

Anything mechanical can fail including alternators, disk brakes, and electronic ignition. Not knocking anyone that installs upgrades but really part of the charm of owning a piece of history is experiencing the operational characteristics and nuances these historic pieces exhibit. This "old tech" stuff was state of the art at that time and performed very well by the standards of the day. The old stuff is super reliable if maintained and is fun and rewarding to drive. 35 years without a generator, ignition, or brake failure is a far better record than I've enjoyed with many newer vehicles. Different strokes for different folks and I'll never slight someone for upgrading to newer technology but I for one find the "old stuff" experience enchanting and rewarding. It also gives you a good perspective and comparison to the the advances of engineering and modern technology.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 07:41 AM
  #28  
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,061
Likes: 7,146
Army
Default

Originally Posted by K2
This "old tech" stuff was state of the art at that time and performed very well by the standards of the day. The old stuff is super reliable if maintained and is fun and rewarding to drive.
Not to stray too far off topic but some things don't hold "charm" for me in this regard. Cutting my fingers up on ignition shielding to change points/condensor when I can have an undetectable electronic ignition in place that I basically never mess with after installation makes sense to me. And adding a vacuum advance with current fuel prices makes sense. Likewise when you have to do a 'panic stop' (and this happens sometimes I don't care how much following distance you keep) its nice to have close to the same technology as the car quickly braking in front of you or to keep your braking ability after driving through a deep puddle. These are my only concessions from the original equip on my '61.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

5 Best & 5 Most Overrated Corvette Track Packages of All Time!

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Every 2027 Corvette Engine Explained

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-7

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 01:26 PM
  #29  
Ironcross's Avatar
Ironcross
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,142
Likes: 54
From: Taylor Michigan
Default Polarizing a Regulator

Originally Posted by ls6racer
i don't think it does. i've not seen that in print anywhere.
Right here and in print!.........




Last edited by Ironcross; Aug 17, 2008 at 01:29 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 02:25 PM
  #30  
L78racer's Avatar
L78racer
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 953
Likes: 27
Default

Originally Posted by Ironcross
Right here and in print!.........



i'd have to say that it may not matter either way. i've never done it with the field disconnected and had no adverse effects.
basically what happens during polarization is you draw current thru the generator in the correct polarity (direction of current flow). the most important thing is to jump the BAT to the armature (GEN).

any idea what that regulator in the pic is from?
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 04:12 PM
  #31  
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,061
Likes: 7,146
Army
Default

Obviously a "restamped" voltage regulator with incorrect information..

Seriously, I also have never disconnected the field lead when polarizing and never a problem. I'd have to check the '61 Passenger Car Manual but I'm almost positive it doesn't mention this either. Strange.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 05:41 PM
  #32  
Ironcross's Avatar
Ironcross
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,142
Likes: 54
From: Taylor Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by ls6racer
i'd have to say that it may not matter either way. i've never done it with the field disconnected and had no adverse effects.
basically what happens during polarization is you draw current thru the generator in the correct polarity (direction of current flow). the most important thing is to jump the BAT to the armature (GEN).

any idea what that regulator in the pic is from?
My Bird and its the OE regulator. Replacement regulators will not have that writing.

Reply
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 05:54 PM
  #33  
Ironcross's Avatar
Ironcross
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,142
Likes: 54
From: Taylor Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by fdreano
Obviously a "restamped" voltage regulator with incorrect information..

Seriously, I also have never disconnected the field lead when polarizing and never a problem. I'd have to check the '61 Passenger Car Manual but I'm almost positive it doesn't mention this either. Strange.
Yep, it`s restamped. It took me all night to place that GD printing on it with my computer.........
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 06:20 PM
  #34  
L78racer's Avatar
L78racer
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 953
Likes: 27
Default

Originally Posted by Ironcross
My Bird and its the OE regulator. Replacement regulators will not have that writing.

very nice bird. a 57? how does it compare to your '62 in terms of ride and as an everyday car back in the day? i've never driven one.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 08:11 PM
  #35  
Ironcross's Avatar
Ironcross
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,142
Likes: 54
From: Taylor Michigan
Default

There a really nice car Paul. The ride is much better than any early series Vette. And unfourtinately about 1/2 as fast under the best of conditions for both cars. Except there was a Paxton equipped option Bird and also a dual quad car valued way up with some rare Vettes. Comparison to Vettes would be the 75-82 years in my opinion. With the Birds styling beating out those Vettes. Another thing they are both difficult to get into with a taller person. I like the late model Vettes now because the 638 HP..
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 08:45 PM
  #36  
L78racer's Avatar
L78racer
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 953
Likes: 27
Default

i always liked them as a kid. but, my dad brought home a '54 vette back in 1962. so it's been vettes ever since. the big 'advantage' back then over the birds was that vettes didn't rust. of course, the frame on the '54 rotted out real bad and i replaced it in 1970.

you're a detroit area guy; do you remember bill kennedy? he had a '55-7 t-bird. he always talked about the car etc. on his show...
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2008 | 11:02 PM
  #37  
kverges's Avatar
kverges
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 812
Likes: 42
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Back to topic? I did the test to run the generator from my charger and it spins I'm the correct direction but draws well over 20 amps and the pulley can easily be stopped with finger pressure. Makes me worry there is a short in the armature windings but maybe it is just brushes. Any thoughts?
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2008 | 07:17 AM
  #38  
L78racer's Avatar
L78racer
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 953
Likes: 27
Default

a battery charger is not the best way to test the motoring. but if you can stop it by hand i would say there is a possible problem. you should first try testing it with a battery. there are several checks that can be made with the generator apart. you should really get a service manual and start there.
almost any GM manual for a car with a generator would have the info you can use to check it out. there is a check for the armature which requires a "growler" that you can't do at home. you'd have to find a rebuilder with one of those to test it.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 03:11 PM
  #39  
kverges's Avatar
kverges
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 812
Likes: 42
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Turns out it was the generator and FYI Bob Reams electric in Arlington TX did a fantastic job on an complete mechanical and cosmetic restoration, including going through my regulator to be sure it works. All is well now and thanks for the troubleshooting advice.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:03 PM.

story-0
5 Best & 5 Most Overrated Corvette Track Packages of All Time!

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 most overrated Corvette track packages ever.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 12:46:45


VIEW MORE
story-1
Every 2027 Corvette Engine Explained

Slideshow: Every 2027 Corvette engine explained

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 12:16:31


VIEW MORE
story-2
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette

Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-08 19:53:43


VIEW MORE
story-3
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-6
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-8
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE