engine displacement and airflow
DOKK is trying to become another victom of overcarbing (as much as i've told him not to)
let's do the math:
a 383CI stroker will consume 383 cubic inches every two RPMs at 100% volumnmetric effencity (most street engines will achieve about 80%)
SO:
a 383 engine at 6000 will consume 383 X 3000= 1149000 CI.
to convert CI to CF you need to multiply 12X12X12 =1728.
now if you divide 1149000 into 1728 you will get:
664.93055CFM at 6000, thus a 650 carb would be perfect. in reality a little larger carb works better (your 750 is fine) but 900-1000CFM of airflow is a bad idea.
remember, i went from an 800 to a 650 on my pantera.
the math:
351CI at 3000 (6000 RPM) =1053000
12x12x12=1728
1053000 devided by 1728=609.375. so the 650 carb is just right...DOKK...










1000 CFM of 2bbls is about the same as a 700 CFM 4bbl.






A 2V is rated at 3"WG, a 4V at 1.5"WG. A wide open throttle (WOT) CFM comparison has to be normalized (by the square root of 2, 1.414, factor).
Throttle response is also a function of the throttle plate diameter (in a simplified world), with the smaller plate offering a more defined off-idle response. Driver control is often defined by the off idle throttle response, so for most applications an under-sized carb provides the owner the best drive result.
Three 2V carbs have 6 throttle plates to share the WOT CFM, vs. a single 4V. Three 325 CFM 2V carbs flow about the same as one 700 CFM 4V carb, and with the six-pack each throttle plate flows ~115 CFM at WOT, vs. each of the 4V plates that flow ~175 CFM. Each 4V throttle plate flows about 50% more CFM at WOT, compared to the six-pack plates, making it (in theory) about 50% more difficult to achieve clean throttling off-idle with the similar sized 4V carb.
The same clean throttle response effect from the small throttle plates found with the six-pack and dual-four setups in the 50's was exploited by the radically different size primary and secondary throttle plates of the spread-bore carbs (the QuadraJet & ThermoQuad) in the late 60's. A well tuned Q-Jet offers the great off-idle throttle response of a smaller 100 CFM per venturi 4V carb (comparable to the throttle response of a 390 CFM Holley), with the WOT performance of a 800 CFM carb (comparable to the WOT airflow of the 780 Holley).
Multiple carbs are more than eye candy, but you have to know how to tune the set-up. We would often find the end carbs of six-pack setups disconnected, or with stiff vacuum pot springs to slow the secondary response to near decade lag times. Well tuned set-ups (the 340 AAR Cuda comes to mind) were a ball to drive.
When my friends and I were racing a 427 BBC one of the best street setups was twin 660 CFM 4V carbs on a TeamG tunnelram. The engine would idle clean at 850 cfm, and jet flames from the header flanges at WOT. We ran quicker ET's with a 1050 Dominator on a C454 manifold, but we lost some of the street-friendly throttle response of the dual-fours.
We were guessing a lot with our set-ups and I would have really enjoyed to listen & learn from some of the guys who grew up tuning the multiple carb set-ups, because when they are gone much of the practical knowledge will go with them.

People often make the mistake of comparing 4 barrel CFM to two barrel CFM by simply adding the trips up but the figures they come up with are way wrong.
Withn a 383 he should do well with the 3 2's
Doug
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts











