62 Correct Engine Question

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jul 5, 2009 | 03:02 PM

raritan

Thread Starter

Intermediate

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 45

Likes: 0

62 Correct Engine Question

Greetings,
Would an engine with casting date D132 and pad F0417R make sense on a 62 SN 9949. Please email me as I need this info ASAP
thanks
thomas@yellville.net

Jul 5, 2009 | 05:24 PM

raritan

Thread Starter

Intermediate

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 45

Likes: 0

I really would appreciate help with this.
Thanks

Jul 5, 2009 | 05:41 PM

Frankie the Fink

Team Owner

Joined: Aug 2007

Posts: 58,061

Likes: 7,147

Army

Quote:

Originally Posted by raritan

Greetings,
Would an engine with casting date D132 and pad F0417R make sense on a 62 SN 9949. Please email me as I need this info ASAP
thanks
thomas@yellville.net

If you look 1/2 way down the following page:

http://corvette-world.com/corvette_1...tion_codes.php you will see the engine designation codes for '62. This two-letter suffix occurs at the end of the FXXX series and there is no engine suffix of just 'R' in '62...so...unless you missed another letter after the 'R' its looking like this isn't an original engine.

Jul 5, 2009 | 06:01 PM

mike coletta

Safety Car

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 4,469

Likes: 1,295

From: minneola fl

The 62 engine suffix codes indicate that the R was only used for passenger cars. 250 HP, manual trans.

The Corvette codes with an "R" would be RC, RD, RE, RF.

Mike Coletta

Jul 5, 2009 | 06:55 PM

raritan

Thread Starter

Intermediate

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 45

Likes: 0

Is the casting and assembly dates to close to a 9949 car. I believe there is a letter after the "R".
thanks
Tom

Jul 5, 2009 | 07:37 PM

1snake

Le Mans Master

Joined: Dec 2007

Posts: 8,000

Likes: 659

From: Puget Sound

Is the cars VIN stamped on the pad? If not, it's not the original motor.

Jim

Jul 5, 2009 | 07:47 PM

62Jeff

Tech Contributor

Joined: May 2005

Posts: 15,576

Likes: 118

From: Conroe Texas

I don't think he's asking if it's original, I think he's asking if it's date appropriate for the VIN.

Jul 5, 2009 | 08:04 PM

raritan

Thread Starter

Intermediate

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 45

Likes: 0

Yes, thats what I am trying to find out.
TH

Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

2027 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 First Look: Everything You NEED to Know!

Michael S. Palmer

5 Best & 5 Worst Corvette Daily Drivers

Joe Kucinski

The Headlights of Every Corvette Generation Explained

Joe Kucinski

5 Best & 5 Most Overrated Corvette Track Packages of All Time!

Joe Kucinski

Every 2027 Corvette Engine Explained

Joe Kucinski

Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette

Verdad Gallardo

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Joe Kucinski

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

Brett Foote

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Michael S. Palmer

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Pouria Savadkouei

Jul 5, 2009 | 08:12 PM

62Jeff

Tech Contributor

Joined: May 2005

Posts: 15,576

Likes: 118

From: Conroe Texas

Quote:

Originally Posted by raritan

Greetings,
Would an engine with casting date D132 and pad F0417R make sense on a 62 SN 9949. Please email me as I need this info ASAP
thanks
thomas@yellville.net

According to the Birthday Calculator available here http://www.c1registry.com/

Your car was likely assembled on April 18, 1962.

Given that, a casting date of April 13, and an assembly date of April 17, would just barely make it into the real of possible engines.

Jul 5, 2009 | 08:15 PM

#10

OC-1

Drifting

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 1,747

Likes: 192

From: nj

april 18th

b'day calculator estimates 9949 built on 4.18, close on the stamped date but sounds good.

Jul 5, 2009 | 09:07 PM

#11

1snake

Le Mans Master

Joined: Dec 2007

Posts: 8,000

Likes: 659

From: Puget Sound

Quote:

Originally Posted by 62Jeff

I don't think he's asking if it's original, I think he's asking if it's date appropriate for the VIN.

Oops, my mistake. Assembled in Flint, Michigan on 4-17 and installed in St. Louis Mo. on 4-18. Possible but unlikely. The NCRS judging guide states that 10 days to 8 weeks is normal .

Last edited by 1snake; Jul 5, 2009 at 09:11 PM.

Jul 5, 2009 | 09:17 PM

#12

Frankie the Fink

Team Owner

Joined: Aug 2007

Posts: 58,061

Likes: 7,147

Army

OP first asked if the engine numbers "made sense"...an initial reaction is to think he was interested in originality.. Like 99% of the other posters that ask such questions...

Jul 6, 2009 | 06:50 AM

#13

mike coletta

Safety Car

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 4,469

Likes: 1,295

From: minneola fl

Quote:

Possible but unlikely. The NCRS judging guide states that 10 days to 8 weeks is normal

I don't even think it's possible. If you're looking for a block that "could" have been it the car.....That ain't it!!!

Mike Coletta

Jul 6, 2009 | 11:19 AM

#14

JohnZ

Team Owner

Joined: Oct 2000

Posts: 38,897

Likes: 1,927

From: Washington Michigan

Engines were shipped by rail, and took 2-3 days dock-to-dock to get to St. Louis from Flint; overnight expedited truck shipment would get it there in one day, but that was rare. Highly unlikely that a 4-17 engine would end up in a 4-18 car.

Jul 7, 2009 | 01:12 PM

#15

John E. DeGregory

Advanced

Joined: Apr 2006

Posts: 51

Likes: 1

Quote:

Originally Posted by raritan

Greetings,
Would an engine with casting date D132 and pad F0417R make sense on a 62 SN 9949. Please email me as I need this info ASAP
thanks
thomas@yellville.net

Nice thing about an R engine is that sometimes there is room enough to stamp a suffix after the R. The engine is a Flint Engine I believe. But it appears it s a tad late for your car anyhow. Hit it with an F(RF) and order nice restored 62 fuel injection from old JD or Jerry. JD