C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

Anyone Hunter Alignment Profiient

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 19, 2009 | 05:11 PM
  #1  
RJD42's Avatar
RJD42
Thread Starter
Racer
15 Year Member
Active Streak: 30 Days
Active Streak: 60 Days
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 251
Likes: 1
From: Long Island NY
Default Anyone Hunter Alignment Profiient

I recognize the new machines are the most accurate for alignment. But my experiences with the operators when I tried to get my FFR Cobra and the Corvette aligned was like I was speaking a different language. If the specs are not in their program they can't do it. Anybody know how to explain how to override the program and manually enter specs into their computer. Maybe their is a section in a manual somewhere?
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2009 | 06:35 PM
  #2  
Shurshot's Avatar
Shurshot
Le Mans Master
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,226
Likes: 2
From: Lake Wylie SC
Default

The alignment is what it is.

The equipment does not set the alignment the operator does

However the operator sets the alignment is what the equipment reads....... whether the alignment is good or bad makes no difference because the equipment reads his work

You cannot set Hunter equipment to make an alignment....... you set the alignment good or bad or for street or for track and the equipment reads the alignment as the operator set it.

Doug
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2009 | 06:39 PM
  #3  
Pilot Dan's Avatar
Pilot Dan
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,215
Likes: 447
From: NJ Hockey beer league
Default

Was just checking out one of the new alignment machines at a friends shop this afternoon. Amazingly, nothing touches the car, it is all done from cameras in the front. Anyway, he said the specs for my 64 Coupe for example are in his data base and he could perform an alignment if I wanted one. I am surprised the older Hunter machine does not have those specs. My original alignment was done on one of those Hunter machines. Pilot Dan
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2009 | 10:11 PM
  #4  
Dan Hampton's Avatar
Dan Hampton
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,662
Likes: 2,344
From: Lake Minnetonka, Mn
2018 C1 of Year Finalist
Default

We just picked up a John Bean system at the shop and everything is done with cameras. It is pretty slick and can be had for around $13,000. The system creates a live 3D model of the vehicle and tracks corrections as they happen. Unlike some systems, you don't need the tires on the car to get a reading which is great when having to make adjustments. A great time saver.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2009 | 09:15 AM
  #5  
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,061
Likes: 7,146
Army
Default

More likely the operator just couldn't find your car in the machine's database and didn't want to 'free hand' the settings. I used to have a fit with my Shelby-ized '66 Mustang...the front A arms were lowered an inch. I'd go to a shop and hand the tech the Shelby alignment specs and they were different than the regular '66 Mustang specs housed in the machine's database. Some guys would do the job and some wouldn't.

Took the '61 vette to the Chevy dealer down the street and the kid threw it on the machine and knocked it out in about an hour and boy was it WAY off.

Last edited by Frankie the Fink; Sep 20, 2009 at 09:17 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2009 | 01:01 PM
  #6  
Pilot Dan's Avatar
Pilot Dan
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,215
Likes: 447
From: NJ Hockey beer league
Default

Originally Posted by Dan Hampton
We just picked up a John Bean system at the shop and everything is done with cameras. It is pretty slick and can be had for around $13,000. The system creates a live 3D model of the vehicle and tracks corrections as they happen. Unlike some systems, you don't need the tires on the car to get a reading which is great when having to make adjustments. A great time saver.
Dan, what specs do you use with the new John Bean when aligning a 63-67 Vette with late model radial tires such as the 215 70 15's that many of us use with that machine??? I was having a debate with a friend (who just got that machine) and was trying to convince him the original specs were for bias ply tires not radials and he needed to take that into consideration. He did not think so. Thoughts???? Pilot Dan
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 06:15 AM
  #7  
Dan Hampton's Avatar
Dan Hampton
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,662
Likes: 2,344
From: Lake Minnetonka, Mn
2018 C1 of Year Finalist
Default

Originally Posted by Pilot Dan
Dan, what specs do you use with the new John Bean when aligning a 63-67 Vette with late model radial tires such as the 215 70 15's that many of us use with that machine??? I was having a debate with a friend (who just got that machine) and was trying to convince him the original specs were for bias ply tires not radials and he needed to take that into consideration. He did not think so. Thoughts???? Pilot Dan
We just put the unit together last week and, as a result, we have only done one alignment. I will check on that and get back with you. I need to get my '64 aligned, so that will be on the agenda this week.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 10:23 AM
  #8  
wombvette's Avatar
wombvette
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 8,918
Likes: 27
From: New Hill NC
Default

Originally Posted by Pilot Dan
Dan, what specs do you use with the new John Bean when aligning a 63-67 Vette with late model radial tires such as the 215 70 15's that many of us use with that machine??? I was having a debate with a friend (who just got that machine) and was trying to convince him the original specs were for bias ply tires not radials and he needed to take that into consideration. He did not think so. Thoughts???? Pilot Dan
The originals specs are for bias tires, but in this case that makes little real difference. For radials we set the camber at or near zero, the toe at about 1/16 inch, and as much caster as you can get with the that individual car. It is usually limited to about 3 deg. The original caster specs. were different from PS vs Manual. Manual had less to keep the steering effort down, but that also increases wander.

Last edited by wombvette; Sep 22, 2009 at 06:34 PM.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

5 Best & 5 Most Overrated Corvette Track Packages of All Time!

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Every 2027 Corvette Engine Explained

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-7

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Sep 21, 2009 | 05:13 PM
  #9  
Jimbo64's Avatar
Jimbo64
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: Texas
St. Jude Donor '09
Default

Originally Posted by fdreano
More likely the operator just couldn't find your car in the machine's database and didn't want to 'free hand' the settings. I used to have a fit with my Shelby-ized '66 Mustang...the front A arms were lowered an inch. I'd go to a shop and hand the tech the Shelby alignment specs and they were different than the regular '66 Mustang specs housed in the machine's database. Some guys would do the job and some wouldn't.

Took the '61 vette to the Chevy dealer down the street and the kid threw it on the machine and knocked it out in about an hour and boy was it WAY off.
way off--before or after
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 02:14 PM
  #10  
Dan Hampton's Avatar
Dan Hampton
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,662
Likes: 2,344
From: Lake Minnetonka, Mn
2018 C1 of Year Finalist
Default

Originally Posted by Pilot Dan
Dan, what specs do you use with the new John Bean when aligning a 63-67 Vette with late model radial tires such as the 215 70 15's that many of us use with that machine??? I was having a debate with a friend (who just got that machine) and was trying to convince him the original specs were for bias ply tires not radials and he needed to take that into consideration. He did not think so. Thoughts???? Pilot Dan
PD:

I checked today re: your question on the alignment procedure relative to bias and radial tires for a mid-year Corvette. I was told that there is no adjustment differences between the two types of tires. Hope this helps.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 02:34 PM
  #11  
Pilot Dan's Avatar
Pilot Dan
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,215
Likes: 447
From: NJ Hockey beer league
Default

Originally Posted by Dan Hampton
We just put the unit together last week and, as a result, we have only done one alignment. I will check on that and get back with you. I need to get my '64 aligned, so that will be on the agenda this week.
Thanks Dan, that would make for a great post.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 02:39 PM
  #12  
Pilot Dan's Avatar
Pilot Dan
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,215
Likes: 447
From: NJ Hockey beer league
Default

Originally Posted by wombvette
The originals specs are for bias tires, but in this case that makes little real difference. For radials we set the camber at or near zero, the toe at about 1/16 inch, and as much caster as you can get with the that individual car. It is usually limited to about 3 deg. The original caster specs. were different from non PS vs Manual. Manual had less to keep the steering effort down, but that also increases wander.
Thanks for that info, gonna have to give that new machine a try.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2009 | 07:24 AM
  #13  
Dan Hampton's Avatar
Dan Hampton
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,662
Likes: 2,344
From: Lake Minnetonka, Mn
2018 C1 of Year Finalist
Default

Originally Posted by Pilot Dan
Thanks for that info, gonna have to give that new machine a try.
Pilot Dan:

What specs are you using for the rear?
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2009 | 10:17 AM
  #14  
Mike Geary's Avatar
Mike Geary
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 223
From: Temecula CA
Default Rear Alignment Specs

Originally Posted by Dan Hampton
Pilot Dan:

What specs are you using for the rear?

After a ridiculous amount of research I did for my '65, the consensus specs for the rear seem to be:

Camber: zero to 0.5* neg

Toe In: 1/32" each side, i.e. 0.1* each side, not total
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2009 | 11:27 AM
  #15  
JohnZ's Avatar
JohnZ
Team Owner
Supporting Lifetime Gold
20 Year Member
Veteran: Army
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 38,897
Likes: 1,926
From: Washington Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Dan Hampton
PD:

I checked today re: your question on the alignment procedure relative to bias and radial tires for a mid-year Corvette. I was told that there is no adjustment differences between the two types of tires. Hope this helps.
Not good info. The original bias-ply tire spec for front toe-in was 1/8"-1/4" (total) in the Assembly Manual, or 3/16"-5/16" (total) in the Chassis Service Manual.

Front toe-in for radial tires should be zero-to-1/16" (total); radials have more self-aligning torque and don't require as much toe-in.

Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Anyone Hunter Alignment Profiient





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:44 AM.

story-0
5 Best & 5 Most Overrated Corvette Track Packages of All Time!

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 most overrated Corvette track packages ever.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 12:46:45


VIEW MORE
story-1
Every 2027 Corvette Engine Explained

Slideshow: Every 2027 Corvette engine explained

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 12:16:31


VIEW MORE
story-2
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette

Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-08 19:53:43


VIEW MORE
story-3
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-6
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-8
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE