When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Mike - welcome to the forum. Seems like we have several rear spring questions a week come up here so hopefully it will generate a little business for Eaton Springs and some technical help for the rest of us.
How about the 7 leaf? What is your opinion on it VS the 330# spring? Same question as I emailed you before.
Thanks,
Ken
Ken,
the 7 leaf has a rate of 305lbs so the ride would be a bit softer than the 330lb spring. However, the rates of both increase when the spring is shortened. - Mike
The softer the rate, the greater the unloaded arch should be to achieve the same loaded arch. I wonder if the unloaded arches for the 9-leaf springs may be reversed? 63 is 7-1/2 and 2-rate is 8-11/16?
Bill
Bill, the 6/3 and the 2 stage spring are the same thing. In spring talk we say 6 and 3, which means it is a 2 stage spring. The spring rate of this spring starts at 140 lbs, so it needs a higher free arch. - Mike
Mike - welcome to the forum. Seems like we have several rear spring questions a week come up here so hopefully it will generate a little business for Eaton Springs and some technical help for the rest of us.
Dan
Dan,
Our main concern is helping to keep the information correct. - Mike
Dan Martin, the corvette guru down here, took out my 7 leaf for me in my car, and put in the composite monoleaf fiberglass spring with KYB shocks. I had wanted to go with the Eaton 7 leaf , but Dan was right..
I love the ride now and it was a definite upgrade....
Dan installed new front springs for me too, and got the ride height level and correct...
The whole car was sagged to the ground when Ifirst got it 3.5 years ago..
Bill, the 6/3 and the 2 stage spring are the same thing. In spring talk we say 6 and 3, which means it is a 2 stage spring. The spring rate of this spring starts at 140 lbs, so it needs a higher free arch. - Mike
Mike:
You wrote 6/3
I read 63 (single stage)
I need to get me a 6/3 for my 65
I'm geting too old and creaky for my 7/0.
Thanks for the clarification. I learn something every day.
Mike of Eatonsprings, Welcome to the Forum. Your expert information is quite welcome.
I do all of my driving on "weekends", so my questions might not be representative of the C2 forum member so I might contact you off line for spring info.
Thanks,
Garrett
the 7 leaf has a rate of 305lbs so the ride would be a bit softer than the 330lb spring. However, the rates of both increase when the spring is shortened. - Mike
Ok, so then if you make me a 9 leaf that is 1/2" shorter on each end for wheel clearance, what would the new spring rate be? Also, my biggest complaint about the 330# composite is not so much stiffness but it seems to react too fast. In other words, after compression it feels like it decompresses too fast giving me the sensation of shooting me upward. This is not so much a characteristic of the multi-leaf spring?
Also, my biggest complaint about the 330# composite is not so much stiffness but it seems to react too fast. In other words, after compression it feels like it decompresses too fast giving me the sensation of shooting me upward. This is not so much a characteristic of the multi-leaf spring?
That's because the monoleaf composite spring has no interleaf friction (like a multi-leaf steel spring does); that's why composite springs require shocks with a much higher level of rebound damping to minimize the "bouncy-bouncy" syndrome.
That's because the monoleaf composite spring has no interleaf friction (like a multi-leaf steel spring does); that's why composite springs require shocks with a much higher level of rebound damping to minimize the "bouncy-bouncy" syndrome.
The stock types shocks (even brand new) are completely inadequate in dealing with the characteristics of a composite spring, both in compression and rebound. Most vendors now sell the shocks and spring as a package.
The stock types shocks (even brand new) are completely inadequate in dealing with the characteristics of a composite spring, both in compression and rebound. Most vendors now sell the shocks and spring as a package.
I tried that. VB&P special KYB shocks didn't help, Bilstein Sports didn't help, Bilstein HDs didn't help, QA-1 12 way adjustable didn't help. So shocks are not the answer. At least not for my driving experience. On smooth roads they are fine but for dips, rough roads, they aren't so good.
I tried that. VB&P special KYB shocks didn't help, Bilstein Sports didn't help, Bilstein HDs didn't help, QA-1 12 way adjustable didn't help. So shocks are not the answer. At least not for my driving experience. On smooth roads they are fine but for dips, rough roads, they aren't so good.
Don't the new vette's have a composite spring? I wonder how they deal with the bounce problem?
I tried that. VB&P special KYB shocks didn't help, Bilstein Sports didn't help, Bilstein HDs didn't help, QA-1 12 way adjustable didn't help. So shocks are not the answer. At least not for my driving experience. On smooth roads they are fine but for dips, rough roads, they aren't so good.
Ken:
Shocks prevent multiple bounces, but I think what you're complaining about is just the first bounce. You have a 330 lb/in spring. The F41 spring is 305 lb/in. They are both just too stiff unless you're in your 20s. The standard spring is 140 lb/in. That is a huge difference in stiffness. I think you're gonna need a new (softer) rear spring.
My sensation after going to stiff springs and low-profile tires was that my seat belt was gonna cut me in two on big bumps...but the car cornered on rails. A taller tire will help the ride, but that rear spring is just too stiff.
Shocks prevent multiple bounces, but I think what you're complaining about is just the first bounce. You have a 330 lb/in spring. The F41 spring is 305 lb/in. They are both just too stiff unless you're in your 20s. The standard spring is 140 lb/in. That is a huge difference in stiffness. I think you're gonna need a new (softer) rear spring.
My sensation after going to stiff springs and low-profile tires was that my seat belt was gonna cut me in two on big bumps...but the car cornered on rails. A taller tire will help the ride, but that rear spring is just too stiff.
Bill
And I went from a 360# down to the 330#. Now I should be half that rate?
And I went from a 360# down to the 330#. Now I should be half that rate?
My strategy with the stiff springs (550 front/305 rear) was to pick the roads I drove on. I would actually do a pre-run with a daily driver if I was going somewhere new! (I used my car strictly for high-g back-road-blasting.) I did find that going from 60 series tires to 70 series tires helped the ride, and the handling is still great.
I tried that. VB&P special KYB shocks didn't help, Bilstein Sports didn't help, Bilstein HDs didn't help, QA-1 12 way adjustable didn't help. So shocks are not the answer. At least not for my driving experience. On smooth roads they are fine but for dips, rough roads, they aren't so good.
I have a 360# composite spring on my C3. With worn, stock Delco shocks the ride was unacceptable and handling was dangerous. The car would hop sideways in an uneven corner if taken quickly. With NEW Delcos the handling was at least controllable but the ride was still too bouncy. I have a video a friend took from behind while going through some twisties and the pogo stick oscillations are very noticeable. I tried the KYBs recommended by Corvette Central and the problem was solved. The car does not have the ride or handling quality of a newer Corvette, but I doubt that there's any spring and shock combo that will achieve that.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.