When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
was thinking of doing some longer drives this summer. if i go to states with higher altitudes, like 6,000 , 7,000 ft.above sea level, will i have problems with the 64 not running right? will i have to ajust carbs, etc.? or will the old girl be fine?
was thinking of doing some longer drives this summer. if i go to states with higher altitudes, like 6,000 , 7,000 ft.above sea level, will i have problems with the 64 not running right? will i have to ajust carbs, etc.? or will the old girl be fine?
Just drive it. At high altitude it'll run a little rich, but will come back to normal as you descend back near sea level.
The only times you may have problems is crossing some the passes over the continental divide in Colorado, or say climbing the hill out of Reno, down over into Mono lake, where you be at 10,000 feet +/-.
Just drop down a gear and keep the revs higher if your car starts to buck,and remember if you punch it, it may stumble and bog from the added accelerator pump richness, and it will take you a LOT longer to pass someone. Remember the newer cars are altitude compensated, they just lose power proportionally to altitude, you lose 2 times as much due to combo of altitude and overly rich.
thanks, guys!! thats about what i expected but wasn't sure. i can remember yearssssss ago, in higher altitude, the car running like crap. just wasn't sure if i should do anything about it!!!!
The only times you may have problems is crossing some the passes over the continental divide in Colorado, or say climbing the hill out of Reno, down over into Mono lake, where you be at 10,000 feet +/-.
Not to be nit-picking, Doug, but,... well,... OK I'm picking nits. Reno is around 6000' and Mono Lake is around 5500', as I recall. Between the two areas I believe you tickle 7500' at the highest point on 395. To come even close to 10000' you have to go to the Tioga Pass Yosemite entrance on hiway 120. And even this is only about 9980'.
And for the OP..... if your travels can take you to 395 in the Eastern Sierra, the views and places you can see and visit are well worth it.
Jim
Last edited by jim lockwood; Mar 7, 2010 at 09:11 PM.
was thinking of doing some longer drives this summer. if i go to states with higher altitudes, like 6,000 , 7,000 ft.above sea level, will i have problems with the 64 not running right? will i have to ajust carbs, etc.? or will the old girl be fine?
Not to be nit-picking, Doug, but,... well,... OK I'm picking nits. Reno is around 6000' and Mono Lake is around 5500', as I recall. Between the two areas I believe you tickle 7500' at the highest point on 395. To come even close to 10000' you have to go to the Tioga Pass Yosemite entrance on hiway 120. And even this is only about 9980'.
OK, it was 30 years ago, it was one of those sierra area passes....
Ever been on that one pass off 395, right at the Marine winter training base that has the 30+% grade and connects to highway 49?
Ever been on that one pass off 395, right at the Marine winter training base that has the 30+% grade and connects to highway 49?
Most mountain highways have 6% grade max.
Once. That's hiway 108 to Sonora. Not my favorite mountain pass.
Another road in the Sierra that has an astonishingly steep grade is hiway 4, just south of the little town of Markleeville..... around 25%, if I remember the warning signs correctly. No thanks. Not in my '60.
Not to be nit-picking, Doug, but,... well,... OK I'm picking nits. Reno is around 6000' and Mono Lake is around 5500', as I recall. Between the two areas I believe you tickle 7500' at the highest point on 395. To come even close to 10000' you have to go to the Tioga Pass Yosemite entrance on hiway 120. And even this is only about 9980'.
And for the OP..... if your travels can take you to 395 in the Eastern Sierra, the views and places you can see and visit are well worth it.
64 with drum brakes? I think brakes are the biggest risk for your trip, not the mixture. Just watch for signs of fade (increased pedal pressure required), and be prepared to downshift to slow the car.
My '66 lived at 5500' in Colorado for years and made numerous trips above 12,000' with the same tune. Yeah...it certainly wasn't the same beast up there, but it ran ok....just rich...and came back home to the same tune; running the same. Now, I am down at 1500', and it is an entirely different animal indeed.....!!!
64 with drum brakes? I think brakes are the biggest risk for your trip, not the mixture. Just watch for signs of fade (increased pedal pressure required), and be prepared to downshift to slow the car.
Harry
i think your right about that Harry! i was worried about going up the mountain. but with drum brakes , coming down could be more exciting!!!
i think your right about that Harry! i was worried about going up the mountain. but with drum brakes , coming down could be more exciting!!!
Ray
Absolutely! Having driven my '67 Camaro to my future wife's West Virginia (no jokes please -- we were NOT related before the marraige!) mountain home back in the day...I can tell you that proper use of engine braking (via downshifting) and prudent use of the decades old brake system is crucial. I remember negotiating severe 'switchbacks' and 'hollers' (that's "hollows" for you Northerners) and bridges across gorges made out of rope and railroad ties!
The car will be anemic above a certain altitude as far as acceleration but that takes a back seat to being able to slow down/stop as needed. Anybody that's come down Pike's Peak knows the only thing they check is the temperature of your brakes with an IR gun on the way down....if it exceeds their safety threshold...they tell you to pull over until they cool down...
Last edited by Frankie the Fink; Mar 10, 2010 at 11:18 AM.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.