When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Wow...great responses everybody...let me address a few...
.........Kensmith, it's a new electric fan, pulling 18 amps, 2500 cfm, puller mounted on correct side of rad. You can feel the air moving from front to back really well. But it took running it for 30 minutes with the engine off to cool it from 240 to 180.......
Without the motor running or at least something spinning that water pump, running the fan motor wont do much to cool the water inside the engine.... not that that little tidbit of information helps anything.
You should call me at 517-548-0600 tomorrow and we can discuss this problem. I think you have way too many cooks in the kitchen
Seriously call Tom. I went through water pumps, pressure checks, fan clutches, timing, head gasket checks, thermostats, fans, and things I have forgot about. Went over all this with Tom and bought a Spal 16" puller from him as he said all else appears good so has to be air flow. He was right. Give him a call, advice is free and you won't waste a bunch of time, money, and labor trying to figure it out. There are many things to check and test and you probably have done most of them already. Give him a call.
Need to know what your timing map looks like - it matters, A LOT.
Someone with the same year and BB has been talking with our tech support (John Dingman) and he says the car has an MSD ignition with no vacuum can. If the OP is that person, then no need to call me. You need to replace the distributor to get this to work right.
JohnZ wrote a beautiful article on this and it is now available to download from our website.
Someone with the same year and BB has been talking with our tech support (John Dingman) and he says the car has an MSD ignition with no vacuum can. If the OP is that person, then no need to call me. You need to replace the distributor to get this to work right.
JohnZ wrote a beautiful article on this and it is now available to download from our website.
I hate to bring up the unthinkable, but, who rebuilt your engine? If there is any trash in the galleries it will quickly wipe out your main bearings, especially the rearmost one, causing excess friction. A number of internal problems might have been caused by improper cylinder wall honing, ring end gap, piston to wall clearance, etc etc etc. If your engine has too much friction to start with, then all of the above mentioned (obvious fixes) will have no effect. If your motor is healthy, and with a new DeWitts radiator, then it should have plenty of cooling capacity to keep temps at a reasonable level.
Has this problem been ongoing since the engine build, or has something else happened in the interim which made the problem apparent?
Well, if it is cooling adequately when moving but overheats when stationary it seems that it has to be related to airflow through the radiator when the car is stationary. which means the fans. Have you tried a stock type fan either with a clutch or direct drive?
One thing that you can do that will work is to replace the water/coolant with 100% propylene glycol. You run it unpressurized (drill a small hole in the cap). I ran this in a 69 big block and it never overheated anywhere from Sears Point Raceway to stop and go traffic on 100F days. This being said, if it will cool when moving then you know that everything is OK with enough airflow through the radiator.
Originally Posted by SIXTSVN
Wow...great responses everybody...let me address a few...
Kensmith, it's a new electric fan, pulling 18 amps, 2500 cfm, puller mounted on correct side of rad. You can feel the air moving from front to back really well. But it took running it for 30 minutes with the engine off to cool it from 240 to 180.
Magicv8, I will try a few of those ideas.
63split63, it's a brand new high volume water pump from Summit...seems to be working as it should...water is moving fine, just gets really, really hot.
midyearvette...Hi Peter...yep, everything else is up to snuff, but I'm interested in hearing your points on no head bolt sealer or improper bolt torque...can you expand my knowledge on those? Thanks...
Donald31176...I'll double check that.
MikeM...it's a completly newly built engine...no California involved here...
Claysmoker...Dave, I like your idea and I'll try that...want to take over this build since you have so much free time on your hands? So where's the finished project?
Time to post this and go try a few of these things out...Nick
Well, if it is cooling adequately when moving but overheats when stationary it seems that it has to be related to airflow through the radiator when the car is stationary. which means the fans.
Not nececessarily the root cause. If this is indeed the car Mr. DeWitt referenced and it has no vacuum advance, then while the car is moving and the engine is above idle, the timing is advanced by the mechanical advance, but at idle the mechanical advance may be adding no timing at all (when a vacuum advance would be doing its job) and you get an overheat situation.
Not nececessarily the root cause. If this is indeed the car Mr. DeWitt referenced and it has no vacuum advance, then while the car is moving and the engine is above idle, the timing is advanced by the mechanical advance, but at idle the mechanical advance may be adding no timing at all (when a vacuum advance would be doing its job) and you get an overheat situation.
Not nececessarily the root cause. If this is indeed the car Mr. DeWitt referenced and it has no vacuum advance, then while the car is moving and the engine is above idle, the timing is advanced by the mechanical advance, but at idle the mechanical advance may be adding no timing at all (when a vacuum advance would be doing its job) and you get an overheat situation.
DT
But what about all the cars with ported V. A. or with no V.A. that never overheat? I could see V.A. I would like to see some actual tests with various engine configurations. Without testing data, it's all anecdotal.
Valid point and certainly true. However, I had a 69 with a LS6 crate motor with roller cam...no vacuum advance and no overheating. Didn't the L88 cars have no vacuum advance as well?
Originally Posted by NOM61
Not nececessarily the root cause. If this is indeed the car Mr. DeWitt referenced and it has no vacuum advance, then while the car is moving and the engine is above idle, the timing is advanced by the mechanical advance, but at idle the mechanical advance may be adding no timing at all (when a vacuum advance would be doing its job) and you get an overheat situation.
Sorry to hear you are having problems with the new build.
It has been obscenely hot in Chicago this summer. I drive my L-68 almost every day. On 90+ degree humid days, the car will reach 190-195 at the upper radiator hose while standing still. At speed it drops down to about 180. It never gets hotter than 195, no matter what. Cooling system is 100% factory configuration, with brand new fan clutch and fresh coolant. I think you have either a problem with airflow AND/OR a timing problem.
As JohnZ asked, please tell us more about your timing configuration.
Out of curiosity, why use and electric fan instead of maintaining the OE setup?
But what about all the cars with ported V. A. or with no V.A. that never overheat? I could see V.A. I would like to see some actual tests with various engine configurations. Without testing data, it's all anecdotal.
If initial timing and the mechanical advance curve are set up to compensate for the lack of vacuum advance everything can work fine.
But if you just swap out a vacuum advance distributor for pure mechanical, and still set initial timing per the factory specs for that engine, and don't curve the distrubutor to compensate...
But what about all the cars with ported V. A. or with no V.A. that never overheat? I could see V.A. I would like to see some actual tests with various engine configurations. Without testing data, it's all anecdotal.
Good point. The '66 L-72 and both of the '67 3x2's (L-68 and L-71) were originally set up with ported vacuum to the distributor for emissions compliance. In every case where I've recommended changing from ported to a full manifold vacuum source on those engines, owners reported significant idle and low-speed traffic cooling improvement, as well as improved throttle response, idle stability, and fuel economy. You could say that's anecdotal as well, but it's also a 100% success rate on dozens of cars.
As JohnZ asked, please tell us more about your timing configuration.
Out of curiosity, why use and electric fan instead of maintaining the OE setup?
I think we may have lost the OP. I too would like to hear more.
As far as Electric fan go, I happen to like them but let me explain.
The original engine driven design was fine and when everything is set up right there should be no reason to go with electric or flex fans.
Electric fans can move a lot more air than the stock system and the more air through the core, the more heat rejection. In problem cases when you need to boost the cooling system beyond the normal range, electric fans are the answer. I do not believe in multiple systems such as the OP using flex fans with electric fans.
I think we may have lost the OP. I too would like to hear more.
As far as Electric fan go, I happen to like them but let me explain.
The original engine driven design was fine and when everything is set up right there should be no reason to go with electric or flex fans.
Electric fans can move a lot more air than the stock system and the more air through the core, the more heat rejection. In problem cases when you need to boost the cooling system beyond the normal range, electric fans are the answer. I do not believe in multiple systems such as the OP using flex fans with electric fans.
Tom i have not been to your site in a long time. My question is does your company sell "Accurate Reading", and "Tested" Temp Sending Units?
I should have looked before asking, i see you sell them but are they tested for accuracy?
jack
Nick,do you have a heat riser on the exhaust system.If you do check to see it opens all the way.That will make your motor run hot,It happened to me.When i relized the problem a quick fix and problem solved .Bob W
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.