When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Has anyone ever heard of converting the tri power set up from vacuum to mechanical?? Just heard that today...does it work?
Yes, back in the day, there were (at least) two different kits....I used them both. I was dissatisfied with the vacuum opening because at the drag strip, they would sometimes open, and then snap shut after first gear, and would not reopen.
Now the mechanical secondaries worked.....BUT, neither kit would open the end carbs ALL the way open when the center carb was wide open. The second kit worked better, but had the same problem. Also, there is a definite "step" to get the end carbs open. some people who drove my car simply refused to believe that there were secondaries to open cause they thought they were flat on the floor. When the end carbs do open, they provide fairly sudden amounts of torque, so that say, in a corner, you can get throttle oversteer. Still, I thought they were much better than the vacuum....just not perfect.
Has anyone ever heard of converting the tri power set up from vacuum to mechanical?? Just heard that today...does it work?
I'm surprised there are any vacuum set ups left for the older tri power Pontiacs, Oldsmobiles and Chevys. Many of them went in the garbage. I don't think Ford used the vacuum linkage on their 3 X 2's. Think it was all mechanical.
Pontiac did use a vacuum operated Tripower for manual trans '64 GTO's but it wasn't a good design because instead of a separate vacuum cannister on each of the secondary carbs, there was a single cannister and that operated the front and rear carbs via linkage. My '64 came with that setup but most people converted their '64's to the same progressive linkage the factory went to for '65 and '66 and that's what I did as well.
A progressive/mechanical tripower setup isn't as forgiving as a vacuum style tripower. Have it incorrectly adjusted or hit it when your rpm is too low and it can be bog city.
A progressive/mechanical tripower setup isn't as forgiving as a vacuum style tripower. Have it incorrectly adjusted or hit it when your rpm is too low and it can be bog city.
Mike T.
Yer 'sposed to know what yer doin' if you have one of those things.
Yer 'sposed to know what yer doin' if you have one of those things.
Got to say there is a learning curve alright. I only have about 750 miles on my '64 3x2 GTO with 3:23 gears since I put it together in '02 and the car is quite responsive. But, I have the secondaries set so that I'm into the primaries for over half the throttle movement, with the secondaries not coming in till around 65% thottle which is higher than the factory had it in 65/66, but if I'm in a higher gear coming on the freeway and just around 2K rpm, stomping the go-pedal doesn't do a whole bunch of anything and downshifting becomes a necessity.
For most people used to the smoother introduction of secondaries with 4 barrels or tripowers, a mechanical setup takes some getting used to.
Mike T.
2025 c3 ('68-'73) of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2025 C4 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2025 C8 Stingray of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
Back in the day my DD was a 68 L89 with mechanical secondaries. PO installed them, I readjusted them. Never had any bog issues and the car ran like a wild beast on steroids.
Your waisting your time trying to make a 435 into mechanical linkage.
....there are no pumps in the outboard carbs....Besides a good setup {not fuked with} works quite well.....same as a FI car that's left alone.......You cant re-engineer what GM proved works......
I did it to my 1967 427/400hp vette when it was 2 years old in 1969. Progressive mechanical linkage and I had no problem to get full throttle on all 3 carbs. Mine worked just fine, no bogging, even at lower rpm, but that was with the mild cam 400 hp. Very nice to feel the hard surge when the end carbs slam open, feels like down shifting.