When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Having trouble posting pictures but I'll work on it.
The 1965 Engine I asked about a week ago -- Thinking of trading it for a pair of ET III wheels. Trying to find out how original it is and I've come to the conclusion it's untouched & low mileage. No ridge at the top of the cylinders & they seem to have not been cut.
However the purchaser asked about the markings on the top of the pistons , there are none. He asked about .030 etc.. and a TRW or other part number.
I used a dial caliper & got exactly 4.00 and the pistons are cast on the underside of the top with the number (as best I can tell) 3795337 GM. This is the engine with the windage tray & filter canister & cast date of July 1965. It does have a hydraulic cam (I previously thought no cam was in the block)
The casting # ends in 714. Do these seem to be the original pistons? I've had the block since approx 1978-80.
Was there a 350 HP engine in 1965? I'll e-mail pictures so someone can post My E-mail is RPAdomitis@NWtec.com
I used a dial caliper & got exactly 4.00 and the pistons are cast on the underside of the top with the number (as best I can tell) 3795337 GM. This is the engine with the windage tray & filter canister & cast date of July 1965. It does have a hydraulic cam (I previously thought no cam was in the block)
The casting # ends in 714. Do these seem to be the original pistons? I've had the block since approx 1978-80.
Was there a 350 HP engine in 1965? I'll e-mail pictures so someone can post My E-mail is RPAdomitis@NWtec.com
Thanks
Yes there was a 350 horse engine in 1965. I've sent you an e-mail regarding your photos.
This is one of the pistons out of my 65 350 horse car
Looks like that block has frozen and cracked. Hard to tell from the photos though.
Pull a bearing insert and look for the date stamped on the back side of the shell.
Looks like a factory built SHP with the blue paint on the main caps and outside the block, yellow paint swipe on the crank. Whether it's original or not is of no consequence as everything there will have to be redone/replaced.
Since I'm a new member here, is the cracked block kind of an initiation process/inside joke?
Thanks
No, I'm not joking. Look at the crooked line, parrallel to the block deck. halfway between the lifters and block deck. Both sides.
It hard to tell from the picture but that's what it looks like. Sometimes, when the block freezes and busts the block, that's right where you see a crack. Look on the outside of the block, same height.
#2 the rod caps are ground with a slight concave radius. & each is numbered rod & cap by hand with one of those electronic etching tools. Looks like someone put some time into this engine. Does the concave cap possibly indicate a balance job?
I also have concerns about the possible cracked block that may be just be oil lines. Didgital camera's can make things look good and bad! Can someone smarter than I circle the lines in question and repost pic so 60 gasser can check and make sure we are looking at the same thing? Thanks
I also have concerns about the possible cracked block that may be just be oil lines. Didgital camera's can make things look good and bad! Can someone smarter than I circle the lines in question and repost pic so 60 gasser can check and make sure we are looking at the same thing? Thanks
If this is what is being discussed...I agree....looks suspicious and not like a typical oil stain...
The other side is the same way plus what looks like a veritcal crack on each side between the center cylinders.
If that engine was run with a crack in it like what it looks like, steam could have cleaned the oil off above the crack, explaining the difference in the color of the surface????????
The other side is the same way plus what looks like a veritcal crack on each side between the center cylinders.
If that engine was run with a crack in it like what it looks like, steam could have cleaned the oil off above the crack, explaining the difference in the color of the surface????????
If it's cracked, shouldn't be hard to feel/see.
The vertical "crack" (running from lifter valley to deck surface) looks like a shadow from the protrusion in the casting....
Spend the $50 and have it magged and vatted to know for sure....
I forgot to mention, the flywheel flange on the crankshaft doesn't appear to be 327 configuration. Appears to be more like the '67 302 shape. Hard to tell for sure from the camera angle.
I forgot to mention, the flywheel flange on the crankshaft doesn't appear to be 327 configuration. Appears to be more like the '67 302 shape.
The cutout in the 302 crank flange (photo below) is wider than the one in the photos above; has almost the same thickness of material on both sides between the sides of the cutout and the two adjacent bolt holes.
The crank in question in my 327 block has 2 cutouts and a locating pin. It's exactly the same configuration as the original crank/engine from my 66 327-300HP.
The stroke in this block is also 3.25" so to me it's a 327 crank not a 302
Am I incorrect with this conclusion? I always knew 283-302 cranks having a 3.00" stroke.
I also cleaned up the block with a brass brush & WD-40 and all the marks (looking like cracks) disappeared.
Putting this one to rest --- now getting the engine cleaned up.
Thanks for all of the insight since the last time I worked on a Chevy engine was 1978. This Forum will be one I frequent and provide my findings from this corner of Oregon