When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I know there are a number of factors involved, but in general, what would you consider to be the maximum static compression ratio to run each of these -- 87 octane, 89 octane, and 91/93 octane?
I know there are a number of factors involved, but in general, what would you consider to be the maximum static compression ratio to run each of these -- 87 octane, 89 octane, and 91/93 octane?
I don't think you can be that general and come up with a meaningful answer.
If you narrowed the "factors" down to OEM stock, aftermarket or whatever, then you could "generalize" a little better.
From: fighter pilots make movies, bomber pilots make history
Mike is right as usual, many variables.
Just for reference, the DART 400 with 200 cc heads and ALL my 50 year old 270/283 2 x 4 WCFB set-up makes 500hp dyno. Mar and Apr Auto Enthusiast articles is great primer by Jim Moore on this engine.
It has 11 : 1 ratio @36 degree full mechanical advance at 2800 rpm. I run 93 with no problems. I run fairly lean at 14-14.2 AF ratio.
If I get lazy and do not down shift and lug it a little, I hear some slight detonation. So, I am fairly close to edge.
I want to do a little blend test of 91/93 and determine my tolerance (so if 93 is unavailable how much 91 can I blend).
Thats one engine, but fairly well know parameters.
Joe
In general, maybe 427Hotrod (Jim Moorehorsepower) will chime in but I think he would agree iron heads...10-10.5 OK, Aluminum 10.6-10.9 Ok on 93 oct.
Static compression is only part of it, you also need to know what your dynamic compression as a result of your valve timing. You could be fine at 11:1 with one cam and ping like crazy with a shorter duration cam.
11.1 is about as far as you would want to go with the fuels on the public market.
My muzzy has 11.1 with a set of AFR alums, square roller 240 @ 50 and a stroker crank 302 - 347 and no pinging @ 36 degrees all out.
I guess there are lots of variables but you should get away with around 11.'s of comp with a higher oct fuel. Stewy
There are some head chamber designs that lend themselves better to cutting detonation down...and as said....cam plays a big part.
My 555" is at 11.56 to one and runs 9's@140+ in the 1/4 on pure 93octane. I have very tight quench, but the chambers are pretty *old school* open chamber big block stuff.
It took three or four posts to get the concept down completely, but the factors in getting the maximum static CR right for any selected octane are ignition timing curve, quench volume, cylinder head material, combustion chamber configuration, operating water temperature, intake air temperature and cam overlap (duration of intake and exhaust valves being open at the same time).
It took three or four posts to get the concept down completely, but the factors in getting the maximum static CR right for any selected octane are ignition timing curve, quench volume, cylinder head material, combustion chamber configuration, operating water temperature, intake air temperature and cam overlap (duration of intake and exhaust valves being open at the same time).
Arrrrrroooooooooooooga! You're fired! Get the hook! Not! Wrongo! Incorrectamundo! Scott had the kernel of the main determining factor when he mentioned "valve timing" above. That is only partly correct. What, specifically about valve timing is the single most critical factor relating to detonation potential? There are other valve timing issues that are important, but overlap, in and of itself, has absolutely no bearing. Who knows what engine characteristic is directly affected by valve overlap?
Apart from "valve timing", there are at least 7 other design parameters that I can think of, which have not already been mentioned, as affecting detonation potential in an engine. Can you name some of these?
Detonation parameters: chamber design-plug location-shape( 60's slow burn design vs fast burn and how the chamber shape relates to Location of Peak Pressure 'LPP'), compression ratio, fuel temp, fuel octane, engine timing, cylinder pressure, what did I miss?
Detonation parameters: chamber design-plug location-shape( 60's slow burn design vs fast burn and how the chamber shape relates to Location of Peak Pressure 'LPP'), compression ratio, fuel temp, fuel octane, engine timing, cylinder pressure, what did I miss?
So, you gonna' answer the OP's question or keep him guessing?
This is a good thread, what are the seven other design parameters?
It's better if you do some homework, reading, and practical application. You don't learn as well if somebody tells you the answer (unless you question/debate it).
I'll give you an easy one, since you probably already knew it, but may not recall just now:
Intake Valve Closing(IVC) position(primarily at low rpms)
Shape of piston surface. i.e. dome, flat, dish, (speed/efficiency of flame travel)
Plug gap
Strength, position, timing and frequency of ignition
Rod length
Piston/head metallurgy
combustion chamber/piston surface. i.e. edges that form hot spots or lack thereof
air charge temp as affected by cooling efficiency,coatings, head design, exhaust efficiency, velocity
air charge pressure
engine load
I believe a "rule of thumb" for aluminum heads is that they are generally good for an extra half point in C/R over identical iron heads.
Thats all ll I can think of off hand.
DT
Plug gap has no real effect on whether or not a cylinder detonates. If your reasoning is that a shorter gapped plug will have the spark jump sooner than a wider gapped plug, I'll question that as having a negligible effect.
I'm not sure about rod length having an effect. Explain why this should be?
Mixture was kinda mentioned in post #4, so I'll officially add it here as another very important factor. Richer mixtures cool the chambers and lessen detonation.
I can still think of at least three more factors.
Last edited by 65tripleblack; Mar 26, 2011 at 07:18 AM.