C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

1963 tail light question

Old 06-26-2011, 10:50 AM
  #1  
stevens03
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
stevens03's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2011
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 1963 tail light question

My 63 corvette tailights have 1 clear light and one red on each side. Is this correct or were they all red in 1963.

They dont work any so its hard to say what they do, more curious on what would be correct.

Trim code - std

Thank you
stevens03 is offline  
Old 06-26-2011, 11:02 AM
  #2  
gwalker
Racer
 
gwalker's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

All four should be red.

I am wrong about all red. Back up lights were an option, a very rare one.

Greg

Last edited by gwalker; 06-27-2011 at 09:38 AM. Reason: wrong information.
gwalker is offline  
Old 06-26-2011, 11:11 AM
  #3  
62Jeff
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
62Jeff's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Houston-ish Texas
Posts: 15,499
Received 47 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

Normally the configuration you've described means the car has backup lights.

Do they come on when the car is put in reverse? Backup lights were an option starting in 1963.

Jeff
62Jeff is offline  
Old 06-26-2011, 11:15 AM
  #4  
5thvet
Le Mans Master
 
5thvet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: San Clemente CA
Posts: 5,347
Received 34 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Just the clear don't work or all four?
5thvet is offline  
Old 06-26-2011, 12:44 PM
  #5  
stevens03
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
stevens03's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2011
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

just the clear
stevens03 is offline  
Old 06-26-2011, 12:51 PM
  #6  
Ron Miller
Le Mans Master

 
Ron Miller's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Southeast Missouri
Posts: 8,983
Received 315 Likes on 179 Posts

Default

If it's a manual transmission, see if it has the backup light switch and/or switch connecting rod attached to the reverse shifting arm on the transmission.
Ron Miller is offline  
Old 06-26-2011, 04:24 PM
  #7  
JohnZ
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
JohnZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,856 Likes on 1,099 Posts

Default

You should have a backup light switch on the side of the transmission, with a rod connected to the reverse lever.
Attached Images  
JohnZ is offline  
Old 12-15-2016, 12:50 PM
  #8  
Tom McMahon
Instructor
 
Tom McMahon's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2015
Posts: 197
Received 26 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevens03
My 63 corvette tailights have 1 clear light and one red on each side. Is this correct or were they all red in 1963.

They dont work any so its hard to say what they do, more curious on what would be correct.

Trim code - std

Thank you
Hi,
I know this is an old thread and just read thread for the first time.
Any documented 1963 Corvette's out in the field with this rare option (RPOT86 - Backup Lamps) This was $10.80 option and out of 21,513 cars built only 318 1963 Corvette's had this option or less then 1.5%
Tom McMahon is offline  
Old 12-15-2016, 04:05 PM
  #9  
Wakepowell
Advanced
 
Wakepowell's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2016
Posts: 75
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I have a documented 1963 Coupe with this option.
Wakepowell is offline  
Old 12-15-2016, 04:40 PM
  #10  
Tom McMahon
Instructor
 
Tom McMahon's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2015
Posts: 197
Received 26 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wakepowell
I have a documented 1963 Coupe with this option.
You have a rare 1963 Corvette.
Is your 1963 Corvette an early Corvette with depressions under the seats for tool storage.
Also the seat height was adjustable on early 1963 Corvette's and the headlamp buckets were fiberglass.
According to GM Heritage, the 1963 Corvette 37 style was known as the aero coupe.
Early Corvette's with depressions under the seat had different configuration for the exhaust system.
One other item, believe the glove box door had clear plastic film on outer door on early 1963's.
The 1963 Corvette was the most exciting Corvette ever.
I had a brand new 1967 BB with N11 from the factory VIN 194677S100560
Very early 1967 built 09/09/1966.

Last edited by Tom McMahon; 12-15-2016 at 04:41 PM.
Tom McMahon is offline  
Old 12-15-2016, 04:59 PM
  #11  
Wakepowell
Advanced
 
Wakepowell's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2016
Posts: 75
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

My 1963 was built in June '63 and delivered July 11, 1963. It does not have the deeper wells in the floor. It is also unrestored and I have all order forms and documents the cars came with.


How were you able to determine that only 318 Corvette's were built with the reverse lamp option in 1963?
Wakepowell is offline  
Old 12-15-2016, 05:09 PM
  #12  
corvettesander
Instructor
 
corvettesander's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 176
Received 39 Likes on 28 Posts
2017 C1 of Year Finalist

Default

Originally Posted by Tom McMahon
You have a rare 1963 Corvette.
Is your 1963 Corvette an early Corvette with depressions under the seats for tool storage.
Also the seat height was adjustable on early 1963 Corvette's and the headlamp buckets were fiberglass.
According to GM Heritage, the 1963 Corvette 37 style was known as the aero coupe.
Early Corvette's with depressions under the seat had different configuration for the exhaust system.
One other item, believe the glove box door had clear plastic film on outer door on early 1963's.
The 1963 Corvette was the most exciting Corvette ever.
I had a brand new 1967 BB with N11 from the factory VIN 194677S100560
Very early 1967 built 09/09/1966.
the Seat depressions under the seats on early 63's was not for tool storage, it was intended to accommodate Power Seats, this option was canceled before production,

thats why late 63 the depressions disappeared.
corvettesander is offline  
Old 12-15-2016, 05:18 PM
  #13  
Chuck Gongloff
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Chuck Gongloff's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Beverly Hills/Pine Ridge Florida
Posts: 10,733
Received 561 Likes on 349 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Wakepowell

How were you able to determine that only 318 Corvette's were built with the reverse lamp option in 1963?
That's the figure quoted in the Corvette Black Book.
Chuck Gongloff is offline  
Old 12-15-2016, 05:44 PM
  #14  
Tom McMahon
Instructor
 
Tom McMahon's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2015
Posts: 197
Received 26 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wakepowell
My 1963 was built in June '63 and delivered July 11, 1963. It does not have the deeper wells in the floor. It is also unrestored and I have all order forms and documents the cars came with.


How were you able to determine that only 318 Corvette's were built with the reverse lamp option in 1963?
Went into Chevrolet Corvette regular production options for the 1963 Corvette model year and looked at option conditions for both the 37&67 model styles.
Tom McMahon is offline  
Old 12-15-2016, 05:46 PM
  #15  
Tom McMahon
Instructor
 
Tom McMahon's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2015
Posts: 197
Received 26 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by corvettesander
the Seat depressions under the seats on early 63's was not for tool storage, it was intended to accommodate Power Seats, this option was canceled before production,

thats why late 63 the depressions disappeared.
Yes you are correct and I was wrong.
When you stated this correction I remembered.
Tom McMahon is offline  
Old 12-15-2016, 05:48 PM
  #16  
Tom McMahon
Instructor
 
Tom McMahon's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2015
Posts: 197
Received 26 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by corvettesander
the Seat depressions under the seats on early 63's was not for tool storage, it was intended to accommodate Power Seats, this option was canceled before production,

thats why late 63 the depressions disappeared.
You are correct.
I did know at one time the correct answer and forgot.

Last edited by Tom McMahon; 12-15-2016 at 05:48 PM.
Tom McMahon is offline  
Old 12-15-2016, 09:10 PM
  #17  
Critter1
Melting Slicks
 
Critter1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Pasco Florida
Posts: 2,842
Received 621 Likes on 441 Posts

Default

The T86 back up lamp option for 63 became available late in the model year.
Critter1 is offline  

Get notified of new replies

To 1963 tail light question

Old 01-23-2020, 11:07 AM
  #18  
OldCorvetter
Racer
Support Corvetteforum!
 
OldCorvetter's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2012
Posts: 489
Received 278 Likes on 137 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Critter1
The T86 back up lamp option for 63 became available late in the model year.
Yes I know this is an old thread. But my question is directly related.

Apparently the T86 option was only available late in the production run of 22,000 cars. Does this mean that it was not on the order form at the beginning of the year, or was it on there and you just didn’t get it when the car arrived?

See the picture below. Early window sticker for car 01379 shows the T86 option being selected for $10.80. Car was built Oct 10, 1962. An early car.

I doubt the window sticker is a fake for a few reasons. And the car does not currently even have the backup lights on it, so no money grab being done for having the rare option, so putting it on a fake window sticker would have been a waste of time.

I know that other mid year options like L78 did not show up on the early order forms, so I’m wondering how this got ordered, showed up on the window sticker, and if the car May have originally been delivered with the lights. Thanks for any insight.


OldCorvetter is offline  
Old 01-23-2020, 12:19 PM
  #19  
TC233
CF Senior Fox Bat
Support Corvetteforum!
 
TC233's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,818
Received 616 Likes on 359 Posts

Default

I have an original dealer book that pre-dates the arrival of the 63 Vette to the public. It does not list back up lights as an available option but does list knock offs which tells you it did pre-date the arrival of the car
So not sure how that piece of paper has the back up light option that was not listed, especially that early in production. Can't imagine anyone going out of their way to falsify it so perhaps the code for backup was whispered down from GM to dealers and someone tried to order it but never got it?

Last edited by TC233; 01-23-2020 at 12:20 PM.
TC233 is offline  
Old 01-23-2020, 01:34 PM
  #20  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

Originally Posted by TC233
I have an original dealer book that pre-dates the arrival of the 63 Vette to the public. It does not list back up lights as an available option but does list knock offs which tells you it did pre-date the arrival of the car
So not sure how that piece of paper has the back up light option that was not listed, especially that early in production. Can't imagine anyone going out of their way to falsify it so perhaps the code for backup was whispered down from GM to dealers and someone tried to order it but never got it?
Puzzling indeed -- and we'll prob never know how it occurred ...
Frankie the Fink is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 1963 tail light question



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:48 AM.