Clone vs Orginal





Ever since I was in the 8th grade in 1957, I have always wanted a FI 57 Vette. NEVER could afford one! Finally in 73, the best opportunity that came along was a 56 that was mostly there, but needed lots of work. In 73, there was no such thing as NCRS and I didn't hear about NCRS until 78. By then I had built the 56 the way I wanted it. As time went by, I added FI, big brakes, 4sp, posi, etc, etc, so that it was what I wanted. Yes, it would be nice to have a genuine 57 FI car, but today it would cost more money than I could ever come up with. And now, my 56 has all the "good" stuff that would be on a genuine 57 Airbox car--------------------at only a fraction of the price!
So, again, it's really a personal preference as to what you want---------------and can afford.
Tom Parsons
then they could drive and be proud of owning a fancy make believe Corvette DA! RIGHT 
Clones and resto-mods done right can make a beautiful cars.
It's a nice night and now I think I'll go out and embarrass myself and drive my "fancy make believe corvette"! I'll try not to bring down the neighborhood.
The L79 in my 65 is a chevy over-the-counter motor from years ago, and the car is a whole lot more fun to me to drive because the original 300 horse motor is long gone, and I don't care (so much) if the 350 horse engine in it now, goes T.U.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Ever since I was in the 8th grade in 1957, I have always wanted a FI 57 Vette. NEVER could afford one! Finally in 73, the best opportunity that came along was a 56 that was mostly there, but needed lots of work. In 73, there was no such thing as NCRS and I didn't hear about NCRS until 78. By then I had built the 56 the way I wanted it. As time went by, I added FI, big brakes, 4sp, posi, etc, etc, so that it was what I wanted. Yes, it would be nice to have a genuine 57 FI car, but today it would cost more money than I could ever come up with. And now, my 56 has all the "good" stuff that would be on a genuine 57 Airbox car--------------------at only a fraction of the price!
So, again, it's really a personal preference as to what you want---------------and can afford.
Tom Parsons
kinda/sorta the same story with my 62... except i was 34yo
Bill
I did a 55 and it was correct and a prize winner, not much fun to drive. Then came a string of roll your own straight axle cars, my motors and all with muncie 4 speeds, way more fun. The latest is a 62, Jim Meyer front and back, 383 and a killer body. Best one yet.
Here is my take on this, when someone other than me pays the bills they can call the shots until that happens they can pound sand.
To emulate something so original and unique it invites imitation.
Rarity is valuable...you can't make more originals....I can pump out clones of something as long as I have money and parts...






I am, of course, kidding around. But, this is a good topic. Using a 1957 as an example, if you have a low horse automatic in White or Cascade Green, then converted using all of the "right" parts make it into a 283/283 Fuelie with 4-speed in "resale" red or black. THEN, is it worth more money? I say yes, even if the seller discloses the truth. JMO
Joe






I have a "clone" '63 FI I built myself at about a third or less than the cost of what some call "real" cars.
My car is more real than most as it still has original interior, paint, body panels, all the cosmetics and all the right parts under the hood, just like it would have left the factory.
No, it's not for sale at any price. I have it because I can now afford it. When these cars were new or even ten years old, I couldn't (or wouldn't).
I'd rather have this plug than one of those rehashed rebuilt, fluffed/buffed $100K resto cars that's no more original than all the repop cosmetics and half the body panels replaced, aftermarket interior and some kind of thick looking base/clear paint and I have mine at a third the cost!











and a